预后营养指数 (PNI):腹膜后脂肪肉瘤手术患者更有希望的营养预测指标。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Management and Research Pub Date : 2024-08-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S474801
Guo-Qiang Xue, Cheng-Peng Li, Ang Lv, Jian-Hui Wu, Xiu-Yun Tian, Hui Qiu, Chunyi Hao
{"title":"预后营养指数 (PNI):腹膜后脂肪肉瘤手术患者更有希望的营养预测指标。","authors":"Guo-Qiang Xue, Cheng-Peng Li, Ang Lv, Jian-Hui Wu, Xiu-Yun Tian, Hui Qiu, Chunyi Hao","doi":"10.2147/CMAR.S474801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extended surgery with multi-visceral resection is the standard treatment for retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS). Malnutrition tends to result in increased surgical complications and reduced survival. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic role of nutritional status in patients with RLPS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from 189 consecutive patients with RLPS who underwent surgical treatment at the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between April 2011 and August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The following nutritional parameters were calculated: nutritional risk index, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (time-ROC) curve analysis was conducted to compare the prognostic utility of nutritional indicators. The associations between nutritional indicators and major complications, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the time-ROC curve analysis, the PNI was superior to other nutritional indices at predicting OS. The optimal cut-off value of PNI was 41.2. The PNI was significantly inversely associated with tumor size, tumor grade, and histological subtype. Patients in the low PNI group (< 41.2) had significantly shorter LRFS and OS than those in the high PNI (≥ 41.2) group, with higher major morbidity and mortality rates. The PNI was found to be a unique nutritional predictor that independently predicted LRFS and OS in the multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PNI is an effective tool for nutritional assessment in patients with RLPS. A low PNI value in patients with RLPS predicts worse survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"1021-1030"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI): A More Promising Nutritional Predictor for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma.\",\"authors\":\"Guo-Qiang Xue, Cheng-Peng Li, Ang Lv, Jian-Hui Wu, Xiu-Yun Tian, Hui Qiu, Chunyi Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CMAR.S474801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extended surgery with multi-visceral resection is the standard treatment for retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS). Malnutrition tends to result in increased surgical complications and reduced survival. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic role of nutritional status in patients with RLPS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from 189 consecutive patients with RLPS who underwent surgical treatment at the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between April 2011 and August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The following nutritional parameters were calculated: nutritional risk index, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (time-ROC) curve analysis was conducted to compare the prognostic utility of nutritional indicators. The associations between nutritional indicators and major complications, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the time-ROC curve analysis, the PNI was superior to other nutritional indices at predicting OS. The optimal cut-off value of PNI was 41.2. The PNI was significantly inversely associated with tumor size, tumor grade, and histological subtype. Patients in the low PNI group (< 41.2) had significantly shorter LRFS and OS than those in the high PNI (≥ 41.2) group, with higher major morbidity and mortality rates. The PNI was found to be a unique nutritional predictor that independently predicted LRFS and OS in the multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PNI is an effective tool for nutritional assessment in patients with RLPS. A low PNI value in patients with RLPS predicts worse survival outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Management and Research\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1021-1030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330238/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Management and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S474801\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S474801","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多脏器切除的扩大手术是腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(RLPS)的标准治疗方法。营养不良往往会导致手术并发症增加和生存率降低。本研究旨在确定营养状况对RLPS患者预后的影响:回顾性分析2011年4月至2022年8月期间在北京大学肿瘤医院肉瘤中心接受手术治疗的189例连续RLPS患者的数据。计算了以下营养参数:营养风险指数、预后营养指数(PNI)和2002年营养风险筛查。为比较营养指标的预后效用,进行了时间依赖性接收者操作特征(time-ROC)曲线分析。研究了营养指标与主要并发症、无局部复发生存率(LRFS)和总生存率(OS)之间的关系:结果:根据时间-ROC曲线分析,PNI在预测OS方面优于其他营养指标。PNI的最佳临界值为41.2。PNI与肿瘤大小、肿瘤分级和组织学亚型明显成反比。低 PNI 组(< 41.2)患者的 LRFS 和 OS 明显短于高 PNI 组(≥ 41.2)患者,主要发病率和死亡率也更高。在多变量分析中发现,PNI是一个独特的营养预测因子,可独立预测LRFS和OS:结论:PNI是对RLPS患者进行营养评估的有效工具。结论:PNI 是对 RLPS 患者进行营养评估的有效工具,RLPS 患者的 PNI 值越低,预示着生存率越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI): A More Promising Nutritional Predictor for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma.

Background: Extended surgery with multi-visceral resection is the standard treatment for retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS). Malnutrition tends to result in increased surgical complications and reduced survival. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic role of nutritional status in patients with RLPS.

Patients and methods: Data from 189 consecutive patients with RLPS who underwent surgical treatment at the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between April 2011 and August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The following nutritional parameters were calculated: nutritional risk index, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (time-ROC) curve analysis was conducted to compare the prognostic utility of nutritional indicators. The associations between nutritional indicators and major complications, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated.

Results: Based on the time-ROC curve analysis, the PNI was superior to other nutritional indices at predicting OS. The optimal cut-off value of PNI was 41.2. The PNI was significantly inversely associated with tumor size, tumor grade, and histological subtype. Patients in the low PNI group (< 41.2) had significantly shorter LRFS and OS than those in the high PNI (≥ 41.2) group, with higher major morbidity and mortality rates. The PNI was found to be a unique nutritional predictor that independently predicted LRFS and OS in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: The PNI is an effective tool for nutritional assessment in patients with RLPS. A low PNI value in patients with RLPS predicts worse survival outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Management and Research
Cancer Management and Research Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
448
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include: ◦Epidemiology, detection and screening ◦Cellular research and biomarkers ◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action ◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies ◦Radiation and surgery ◦Palliative care ◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.
期刊最新文献
The Prognostic Values of Serum Liver Enzymes in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients After Liver Resection: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of 605 Patients. The High Expression of SLC7A11 and GPX4 are Significantly Correlated with β-Catenin in Colorectal Cancer. Metabolic Conditions and Organ Dysfunctions Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Cancer in Hypertensive Patients: A Case-Control Study in China. Dose and Efficacy of Bevacizumab in Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: A Retrospective Study. The Access to Oncology Medicines Coalition: Enhanced in-Country Coordination for Sustainable Access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1