中国健康受试者在空腹和进食状态下服用两种不同厂家生产的利奈唑胺片剂的药代动力学和安全性

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1002/cpdd.1462
Hanjing Chen, Hongrong Xu, Fei Yuan, Hui Li, Lei Sheng, Chao Liu, Weili Chen, Xuening Li
{"title":"中国健康受试者在空腹和进食状态下服用两种不同厂家生产的利奈唑胺片剂的药代动力学和安全性","authors":"Hanjing Chen,&nbsp;Hongrong Xu,&nbsp;Fei Yuan,&nbsp;Hui Li,&nbsp;Lei Sheng,&nbsp;Chao Liu,&nbsp;Weili Chen,&nbsp;Xuening Li","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of a generic drug, linezolid, compared to those of a reference drug in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. This was a randomized, open-label, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study. The subjects received a single dose of the test or reference drug, linezolid (600 mg), in each period. The PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method and compared between the 2 drugs. Bioequivalence was analyzed using geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the 2 formulations and their corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs). The safety of the 2 formulations was assessed under both fasting and fed conditions. Forty-eight subjects completed the study, 24 each in the fasting and feeding groups. The average plasma concentration-time patterns of linezolid were similar for both medications under both conditions. The GMR and 90% CIs of the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of linezolid were ranged from 0.80 to 1.25. Both drugs were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse drug reactions. In conclusion, the PK and safety profiles of the 2 formulations were comparable. Food intake did not influence the PK profiles of linezolid. These results suggest that the test drug can be used as an alternative to reference drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"13 11","pages":"1239-1244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Linezolid Tablets of 2 Different Manufacturers in Healthy Chinese Subjects in Fasting and Fed States\",\"authors\":\"Hanjing Chen,&nbsp;Hongrong Xu,&nbsp;Fei Yuan,&nbsp;Hui Li,&nbsp;Lei Sheng,&nbsp;Chao Liu,&nbsp;Weili Chen,&nbsp;Xuening Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of a generic drug, linezolid, compared to those of a reference drug in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. This was a randomized, open-label, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study. The subjects received a single dose of the test or reference drug, linezolid (600 mg), in each period. The PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method and compared between the 2 drugs. Bioequivalence was analyzed using geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the 2 formulations and their corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs). The safety of the 2 formulations was assessed under both fasting and fed conditions. Forty-eight subjects completed the study, 24 each in the fasting and feeding groups. The average plasma concentration-time patterns of linezolid were similar for both medications under both conditions. The GMR and 90% CIs of the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of linezolid were ranged from 0.80 to 1.25. Both drugs were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse drug reactions. In conclusion, the PK and safety profiles of the 2 formulations were comparable. Food intake did not influence the PK profiles of linezolid. These results suggest that the test drug can be used as an alternative to reference drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":\"13 11\",\"pages\":\"1239-1244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1462\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估中国健康受试者在空腹和进食条件下服用仿制药利奈唑胺与参照药的药代动力学(PKs)和安全性比较。这是一项随机、开放标签、两阶段、两序列交叉研究。受试者在每个阶段均接受了单剂量的试验药物或参照药物利奈唑胺(600 毫克)。采用非室间比较法计算 PK 参数,并对两种药物进行比较。生物等效性采用两种制剂的几何平均比(GMRs)及其相应的 90% 置信区间(CIs)进行分析。在空腹和进食条件下对两种制剂的安全性进行了评估。48 名受试者完成了研究,空腹组和进食组各 24 人。在两种条件下,两种药物的利奈唑胺平均血浆浓度-时间模式相似。利奈唑胺的最大血浆浓度和血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积的 GMR 和 90% CI 为 0.80 至 1.25。两种药物的耐受性良好,药物不良反应发生率相似。总之,两种制剂的PK和安全性具有可比性。食物摄入不会影响利奈唑胺的PK曲线。这些结果表明,试验药物可作为参考药物的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Linezolid Tablets of 2 Different Manufacturers in Healthy Chinese Subjects in Fasting and Fed States

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of a generic drug, linezolid, compared to those of a reference drug in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. This was a randomized, open-label, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study. The subjects received a single dose of the test or reference drug, linezolid (600 mg), in each period. The PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method and compared between the 2 drugs. Bioequivalence was analyzed using geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the 2 formulations and their corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs). The safety of the 2 formulations was assessed under both fasting and fed conditions. Forty-eight subjects completed the study, 24 each in the fasting and feeding groups. The average plasma concentration-time patterns of linezolid were similar for both medications under both conditions. The GMR and 90% CIs of the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of linezolid were ranged from 0.80 to 1.25. Both drugs were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse drug reactions. In conclusion, the PK and safety profiles of the 2 formulations were comparable. Food intake did not influence the PK profiles of linezolid. These results suggest that the test drug can be used as an alternative to reference drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
期刊最新文献
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the Neonatal Fc Receptor Inhibitor Rozanolixizumab: An Ethnic Sensitivity Study in Healthy Japanese, Chinese, and White Participants. The Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Active Ingredients From Hydroxysafflor Yellow A in Healthy Chinese Volunteers. Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Montelukast Sodium Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions. Osimertinib Efficacy and Safety in Treating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1