自信外联背景下的参与策略:混合方法系统综述。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2024.2390363
Ellen Berghmans, Nicole Vliegen, Marianne Destoop, Patrick Luyten
{"title":"自信外联背景下的参与策略:混合方法系统综述。","authors":"Ellen Berghmans, Nicole Vliegen, Marianne Destoop, Patrick Luyten","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2024.2390363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assertive outreach (AO) is a systematic approach to engage vulnerable patients with serious mental illness.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of engagement strategies in relation to principles of the AO model to clarify effective components of AO, better understand engagement in an AO context, and consider encompassing change mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic mixed-methods review was completed from 1806 to December 2022 (no pre-registration). Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were rated for methodological quality using the JBI scales and thematic synthesis using a meta-aggregative approach. Reporting was according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The literature was defined by three main themes: definition and perspectives of engagement; key principles of AO in relation to engagement; and additional principles and strategies enhancing engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the heterogeneity in defining engagement, the relationship between AO professionals and patients emerged as crucial in the process of engagement. Subsequently, the four key principles of AO emerged as central to promoting engagement. Finally, we identified a number of additional principles that are considered crucial in the engagement process in AO. The review concludes with recommendations for future research and the implementation of AO in routine clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engagement strategies in an assertive outreach context: a mixed-methods systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Berghmans, Nicole Vliegen, Marianne Destoop, Patrick Luyten\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638237.2024.2390363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assertive outreach (AO) is a systematic approach to engage vulnerable patients with serious mental illness.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of engagement strategies in relation to principles of the AO model to clarify effective components of AO, better understand engagement in an AO context, and consider encompassing change mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic mixed-methods review was completed from 1806 to December 2022 (no pre-registration). Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were rated for methodological quality using the JBI scales and thematic synthesis using a meta-aggregative approach. Reporting was according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The literature was defined by three main themes: definition and perspectives of engagement; key principles of AO in relation to engagement; and additional principles and strategies enhancing engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the heterogeneity in defining engagement, the relationship between AO professionals and patients emerged as crucial in the process of engagement. Subsequently, the four key principles of AO emerged as central to promoting engagement. Finally, we identified a number of additional principles that are considered crucial in the engagement process in AO. The review concludes with recommendations for future research and the implementation of AO in routine clinical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2390363\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2390363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:本综述旨在结合AO模式的原则,对参与策略进行全面分析,以明确AO的有效组成部分,更好地理解AO背景下的参与,并考虑包含的变革机制:从 1806 年至 2022 年 12 月(无预注册),完成了一项系统的混合方法综述。对符合纳入标准的文章采用 JBI 量表进行方法学质量评级,并采用元汇总法进行专题综合。根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)声明进行报告:18篇文章符合纳入标准。文献由三大主题组成:参与的定义和观点;与参与相关的 AO 关键原则;以及促进参与的其他原则和策略:尽管对参与的定义不尽相同,但在参与过程中,矫形专业人员与患者之间的关系至关重要。随后,定向行走的四项关键原则成为促进参与的核心。最后,我们确定了其他一些被认为在参与定向行走过程中至关重要的原则。最后,我们对未来的研究和在常规临床护理中实施 AO 提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Engagement strategies in an assertive outreach context: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Background: Assertive outreach (AO) is a systematic approach to engage vulnerable patients with serious mental illness.

Aims: This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of engagement strategies in relation to principles of the AO model to clarify effective components of AO, better understand engagement in an AO context, and consider encompassing change mechanisms.

Methods: A systematic mixed-methods review was completed from 1806 to December 2022 (no pre-registration). Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were rated for methodological quality using the JBI scales and thematic synthesis using a meta-aggregative approach. Reporting was according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.

Results: Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The literature was defined by three main themes: definition and perspectives of engagement; key principles of AO in relation to engagement; and additional principles and strategies enhancing engagement.

Conclusion: Despite the heterogeneity in defining engagement, the relationship between AO professionals and patients emerged as crucial in the process of engagement. Subsequently, the four key principles of AO emerged as central to promoting engagement. Finally, we identified a number of additional principles that are considered crucial in the engagement process in AO. The review concludes with recommendations for future research and the implementation of AO in routine clinical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
期刊最新文献
Mental health literacy in secondary school teachers and interventions to improve it - a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Changes in sex differences in mental health over time: the moderating effects of educational status and loneliness. Statement of Retraction: Evaluation of the impact of a self-stigma reduction programme on psychosocial outcomes among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. The impact of social support on university students living with mental illness: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. The effectiveness of digital health technologies for reducing substance use among young people: a systematic review & meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1