儿科创伤患者主动脉血管内球囊闭塞复苏术(REBOA)使用现状分析:来自美国外科学院-创伤质量改进计划数据库的一项回顾性观察研究。

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2024-08-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001460
Ling-Wei Kuo, Chien-Hung Liao, Chi-Tung Cheng, Chih-Yuan Fu, Chien-An Liao, Chia-Cheng Wang, Jen-Fu Huang, Chi-Po Hsu
{"title":"儿科创伤患者主动脉血管内球囊闭塞复苏术(REBOA)使用现状分析:来自美国外科学院-创伤质量改进计划数据库的一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Ling-Wei Kuo, Chien-Hung Liao, Chi-Tung Cheng, Chih-Yuan Fu, Chien-An Liao, Chia-Cheng Wang, Jen-Fu Huang, Chi-Po Hsu","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been an established life-saving procedure for adult trauma patients, but the evidence for its use in pediatric patients is still under question. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of REBOA in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed observational cohort data from the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2017 to 2019. We analyzed 183 506 trauma patients aged 7-18, and 111 patients were matched by propensity score analysis. Basic demographics, injury severity, trauma type, and clinical outcomes of the patients receiving REBOA and those not receiving REBOA were compared. In the REBOA patients, a subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the potential influence of age and body weight on the outcomes of REBOA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the pretreatment factors were balanced for the REBOA and no-REBOA groups, the patients in the REBOA group had more transfused packed red blood cells within the first 4 hours (3250 mL vs. 600 mL, p<0.001), and the mortality rate was higher in the REBOA group, but it did not reach statistical significance (56.8% vs. 36.5%, p=0.067). No significant difference was detected regarding in-hospital complications. In the subgroup analysis of the patients who received REBOA, we discovered no significant difference in mortality and complications between the subgroups when compared by age (>15 years old/≤15 years old) or weight (>58 kg or ≤58 kg).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric trauma patients who received REBOA were not significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality when compared with no-REBOA patients with matched basic demographics and pretreatment factors. Younger age and lighter body weight did not seem to influence the outcomes of REBOA regarding survival and complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the current usage of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in pediatric trauma patients: a retrospective observational study from the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program databases.\",\"authors\":\"Ling-Wei Kuo, Chien-Hung Liao, Chi-Tung Cheng, Chih-Yuan Fu, Chien-An Liao, Chia-Cheng Wang, Jen-Fu Huang, Chi-Po Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been an established life-saving procedure for adult trauma patients, but the evidence for its use in pediatric patients is still under question. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of REBOA in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed observational cohort data from the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2017 to 2019. We analyzed 183 506 trauma patients aged 7-18, and 111 patients were matched by propensity score analysis. Basic demographics, injury severity, trauma type, and clinical outcomes of the patients receiving REBOA and those not receiving REBOA were compared. In the REBOA patients, a subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the potential influence of age and body weight on the outcomes of REBOA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the pretreatment factors were balanced for the REBOA and no-REBOA groups, the patients in the REBOA group had more transfused packed red blood cells within the first 4 hours (3250 mL vs. 600 mL, p<0.001), and the mortality rate was higher in the REBOA group, but it did not reach statistical significance (56.8% vs. 36.5%, p=0.067). No significant difference was detected regarding in-hospital complications. In the subgroup analysis of the patients who received REBOA, we discovered no significant difference in mortality and complications between the subgroups when compared by age (>15 years old/≤15 years old) or weight (>58 kg or ≤58 kg).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric trauma patients who received REBOA were not significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality when compared with no-REBOA patients with matched basic demographics and pretreatment factors. Younger age and lighter body weight did not seem to influence the outcomes of REBOA regarding survival and complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e001460\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331927/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:主动脉血管内球囊闭塞复苏术(REBOA)已成为成人创伤患者的救命手术,但在儿童患者中使用该手术的证据仍存在疑问。本研究的目的是探讨REBOA在儿科患者中的应用效果:我们回顾性分析了 2017 年至 2019 年美国外科医生学会-创伤质量改进计划的观察性队列数据。我们分析了 183 506 名 7-18 岁的创伤患者,并通过倾向得分分析匹配了 111 名患者。我们比较了接受REBOA和未接受REBOA患者的基本人口统计学特征、受伤严重程度、创伤类型和临床结果。对接受REBOA治疗的患者进行了亚组分析,以评估年龄和体重对REBOA治疗结果的潜在影响:结果:在平衡了REBOA组和未接受REBOA组的预处理因素后,REBOA组患者在最初4小时内输注的包装红细胞更多(3250毫升对600毫升,P15岁/≤15岁)或体重更多(>58公斤或≤58公斤):结论:接受REBOA治疗的小儿创伤患者与未接受REBOA治疗的患者相比,其死亡风险并没有明显增加。年龄较小和体重较轻似乎不会影响REBOA在存活率和并发症方面的结果:证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of the current usage of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in pediatric trauma patients: a retrospective observational study from the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program databases.

Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been an established life-saving procedure for adult trauma patients, but the evidence for its use in pediatric patients is still under question. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of REBOA in pediatric patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed observational cohort data from the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2017 to 2019. We analyzed 183 506 trauma patients aged 7-18, and 111 patients were matched by propensity score analysis. Basic demographics, injury severity, trauma type, and clinical outcomes of the patients receiving REBOA and those not receiving REBOA were compared. In the REBOA patients, a subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the potential influence of age and body weight on the outcomes of REBOA.

Results: After the pretreatment factors were balanced for the REBOA and no-REBOA groups, the patients in the REBOA group had more transfused packed red blood cells within the first 4 hours (3250 mL vs. 600 mL, p<0.001), and the mortality rate was higher in the REBOA group, but it did not reach statistical significance (56.8% vs. 36.5%, p=0.067). No significant difference was detected regarding in-hospital complications. In the subgroup analysis of the patients who received REBOA, we discovered no significant difference in mortality and complications between the subgroups when compared by age (>15 years old/≤15 years old) or weight (>58 kg or ≤58 kg).

Conclusions: Pediatric trauma patients who received REBOA were not significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality when compared with no-REBOA patients with matched basic demographics and pretreatment factors. Younger age and lighter body weight did not seem to influence the outcomes of REBOA regarding survival and complications.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Potential new treatment for inferior vena cava injury using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation applying flow diversion effect. Endovascular control of ongoing pelvic hemorrhage after intraoperative arterial shunting and venous ligation in peripheral vascular trauma. We do it the same way every time! Eliminating disparities in trauma care. Vape grenade: a patient with maxillofacial injuries with C1-C2 fracture secondary to electronic cigarette blast injury. Early identification of respiratory decompensation among older adults with rib fractures: a sound solution for fragile ribs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1