独立觅食的水和氮都是决定草地物种丰度的重要因素

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Plant and Soil Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s11104-024-06897-z
Leslie Forero, Andrew Kulmatiski
{"title":"独立觅食的水和氮都是决定草地物种丰度的重要因素","authors":"Leslie Forero, Andrew Kulmatiski","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-06897-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Although root distributions are assumed to be important for plant growth and coexistence, it remains difficult to quantify how root distributions affect resource uptake and plant landscape abundance.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In a water- and nitrogen (N)-limited grassland system, Minnesota, USA, we injected water and N tracers to five depths (5–150 cm) during peak growing season. Tracer concentrations in 11 dominant species were measured to describe functional root distributions. Seasonal water and N uptake into these functional root distributions was estimated using depth-specific resource availability. Plant biomass produced from seasonal water and N uptake was estimated using water- and N-use efficiencies. Finally, biomass production was compared to plant landscape abundance.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Differences in functional root distributions resulted in seasonal water uptake between 52 and 67 cm yr<sup>−1</sup>, and N uptake between 1.0 and 3.1 g m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> among species. Biomass production caused by water or N uptake was correlated with plant landscape abundance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.37, 0.35, for water and N). When combined, biomass production from water and N uptake was better correlated with plant landscape abundance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>We show how root systems forage independently for different resources. Consistent with resource availability, water uptake patterns were shallower than N uptake patterns. Root uptake of these two limiting resources affected plant growth and landscape abundance. We provided a quantitative link between functional root distributions, resource uptake, biomass production, and plant landscape abundance. This research represents an important advance from research that describes niche differences among root systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independently foraged water and nitrogen both important in determining grassland species abundances\",\"authors\":\"Leslie Forero, Andrew Kulmatiski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-06897-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and aims</h3><p>Although root distributions are assumed to be important for plant growth and coexistence, it remains difficult to quantify how root distributions affect resource uptake and plant landscape abundance.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>In a water- and nitrogen (N)-limited grassland system, Minnesota, USA, we injected water and N tracers to five depths (5–150 cm) during peak growing season. Tracer concentrations in 11 dominant species were measured to describe functional root distributions. Seasonal water and N uptake into these functional root distributions was estimated using depth-specific resource availability. Plant biomass produced from seasonal water and N uptake was estimated using water- and N-use efficiencies. Finally, biomass production was compared to plant landscape abundance.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Differences in functional root distributions resulted in seasonal water uptake between 52 and 67 cm yr<sup>−1</sup>, and N uptake between 1.0 and 3.1 g m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> among species. Biomass production caused by water or N uptake was correlated with plant landscape abundance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.37, 0.35, for water and N). When combined, biomass production from water and N uptake was better correlated with plant landscape abundance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>We show how root systems forage independently for different resources. Consistent with resource availability, water uptake patterns were shallower than N uptake patterns. Root uptake of these two limiting resources affected plant growth and landscape abundance. We provided a quantitative link between functional root distributions, resource uptake, biomass production, and plant landscape abundance. This research represents an important advance from research that describes niche differences among root systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-06897-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-06897-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的虽然根系分布被认为对植物的生长和共存很重要,但仍难以量化根系分布如何影响资源吸收和植物景观丰度。方法在美国明尼苏达州的一个水氮(N)受限的草地系统中,我们在生长旺季向五个深度(5-150 厘米)注入了水和氮示踪剂。测量了 11 种优势物种的示踪剂浓度,以描述功能性根系分布。利用特定深度的资源可用性估算了这些功能性根系分布的季节性水和氮吸收量。利用水分和氮的利用效率估算了植物从季节性水分和氮吸收中产生的生物量。结果功能根分布的差异导致不同物种的季节性吸水量介于 52 到 67 cm yr-1 之间,吸氮量介于 1.0 到 3.1 g m-2 yr-1 之间。吸水或吸氮所产生的生物量与植物景观丰度相关(吸水和吸氮的 R2 = 0.37 和 0.35)。结论 我们展示了根系是如何独立觅食不同资源的。与资源可用性一致,水的吸收模式比氮的吸收模式更浅。根系对这两种限制性资源的吸收影响了植物的生长和景观丰度。我们提供了功能根分布、资源吸收、生物量生产和植物景观丰度之间的定量联系。这项研究是描述根系生态位差异研究的重要进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Independently foraged water and nitrogen both important in determining grassland species abundances

Background and aims

Although root distributions are assumed to be important for plant growth and coexistence, it remains difficult to quantify how root distributions affect resource uptake and plant landscape abundance.

Methods

In a water- and nitrogen (N)-limited grassland system, Minnesota, USA, we injected water and N tracers to five depths (5–150 cm) during peak growing season. Tracer concentrations in 11 dominant species were measured to describe functional root distributions. Seasonal water and N uptake into these functional root distributions was estimated using depth-specific resource availability. Plant biomass produced from seasonal water and N uptake was estimated using water- and N-use efficiencies. Finally, biomass production was compared to plant landscape abundance.

Results

Differences in functional root distributions resulted in seasonal water uptake between 52 and 67 cm yr−1, and N uptake between 1.0 and 3.1 g m−2 yr−1 among species. Biomass production caused by water or N uptake was correlated with plant landscape abundance (R2 = 0.37, 0.35, for water and N). When combined, biomass production from water and N uptake was better correlated with plant landscape abundance (R2 = 0.75).

Conclusion

We show how root systems forage independently for different resources. Consistent with resource availability, water uptake patterns were shallower than N uptake patterns. Root uptake of these two limiting resources affected plant growth and landscape abundance. We provided a quantitative link between functional root distributions, resource uptake, biomass production, and plant landscape abundance. This research represents an important advance from research that describes niche differences among root systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between nutrient accumulation in broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) and microbial community under different salinity soils Unveiling nematode responses to afforestation from distributions of body size in a subalpine ecosystem Comparative physiology of xylem nickel loading in the hyperaccumulator Odontarrhena inflata and the non-accumulator Aurinia saxatilis Plant-soil feedback responses to drought are species-specific and only marginally predicted by root traits Reintroduction of native species in an ecological restoration program from a quartzite area of campos rupestres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1