Freda Scheffler, Jonathan Ipser, Devarshi Pancholi, Alistair Murphy, Zhipeng Cao, Jonatan Ottino-González, ENIGMA Addiction Working Group, Paul M. Thompson, Steve Shoptaw, Patricia Conrod, Scott Mackey, Hugh Garavan, Dan J. Stein
{"title":"药物使用障碍中脑龄差距的大型分析:ENIGMA成瘾问题工作组的一项研究。","authors":"Freda Scheffler, Jonathan Ipser, Devarshi Pancholi, Alistair Murphy, Zhipeng Cao, Jonatan Ottino-González, ENIGMA Addiction Working Group, Paul M. Thompson, Steve Shoptaw, Patricia Conrod, Scott Mackey, Hugh Garavan, Dan J. Stein","doi":"10.1111/add.16621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The brain age gap (BAG), calculated as the difference between a machine learning model-based predicted brain age and chronological age, has been increasingly investigated in psychiatric disorders. Tobacco and alcohol use are associated with increased BAG; however, no studies have compared global and regional BAG across substances other than alcohol and tobacco. This study aimed to compare global and regional estimates of brain age in individuals with substance use disorders and healthy controls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>This was a cross-sectional study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>This is an Enhancing Neuro Imaging through Meta-Analysis Consortium (ENIGMA) Addiction Working Group study including data from 38 global sites.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>This study included 2606 participants, of whom 1725 were cases with a substance use disorder and 881 healthy controls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements</h3>\n \n <p>This study used the Kaufmann brain age prediction algorithms to generate global and regional brain age estimates using T1 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We used linear mixed effects models to compare global and regional (FreeSurfer lobestrict output) BAG (i.e. predicted minus chronological age) between individuals with one of five primary substance use disorders as well as healthy controls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Alcohol use disorder (β = −5.49, <i>t</i> = −5.51, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was associated with higher global BAG, whereas amphetamine-type stimulant use disorder (β = 3.44, <i>t</i> = 2.42, <i>p</i> = 0.02) was associated with lower global BAG in the separate substance-specific models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>People with alcohol use disorder appear to have a higher brain-age gap than people without alcohol use disorder, which is consistent with other evidence of the negative impact of alcohol on the brain.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":"119 11","pages":"1937-1946"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.16621","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mega-analysis of the brain-age gap in substance use disorder: An ENIGMA Addiction working group study\",\"authors\":\"Freda Scheffler, Jonathan Ipser, Devarshi Pancholi, Alistair Murphy, Zhipeng Cao, Jonatan Ottino-González, ENIGMA Addiction Working Group, Paul M. Thompson, Steve Shoptaw, Patricia Conrod, Scott Mackey, Hugh Garavan, Dan J. Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/add.16621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>The brain age gap (BAG), calculated as the difference between a machine learning model-based predicted brain age and chronological age, has been increasingly investigated in psychiatric disorders. Tobacco and alcohol use are associated with increased BAG; however, no studies have compared global and regional BAG across substances other than alcohol and tobacco. This study aimed to compare global and regional estimates of brain age in individuals with substance use disorders and healthy controls.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a cross-sectional study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is an Enhancing Neuro Imaging through Meta-Analysis Consortium (ENIGMA) Addiction Working Group study including data from 38 global sites.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study included 2606 participants, of whom 1725 were cases with a substance use disorder and 881 healthy controls.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Measurements</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study used the Kaufmann brain age prediction algorithms to generate global and regional brain age estimates using T1 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We used linear mixed effects models to compare global and regional (FreeSurfer lobestrict output) BAG (i.e. predicted minus chronological age) between individuals with one of five primary substance use disorders as well as healthy controls.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Alcohol use disorder (β = −5.49, <i>t</i> = −5.51, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was associated with higher global BAG, whereas amphetamine-type stimulant use disorder (β = 3.44, <i>t</i> = 2.42, <i>p</i> = 0.02) was associated with lower global BAG in the separate substance-specific models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>People with alcohol use disorder appear to have a higher brain-age gap than people without alcohol use disorder, which is consistent with other evidence of the negative impact of alcohol on the brain.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction\",\"volume\":\"119 11\",\"pages\":\"1937-1946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.16621\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16621\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16621","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mega-analysis of the brain-age gap in substance use disorder: An ENIGMA Addiction working group study
Background and Aims
The brain age gap (BAG), calculated as the difference between a machine learning model-based predicted brain age and chronological age, has been increasingly investigated in psychiatric disorders. Tobacco and alcohol use are associated with increased BAG; however, no studies have compared global and regional BAG across substances other than alcohol and tobacco. This study aimed to compare global and regional estimates of brain age in individuals with substance use disorders and healthy controls.
Design
This was a cross-sectional study.
Setting
This is an Enhancing Neuro Imaging through Meta-Analysis Consortium (ENIGMA) Addiction Working Group study including data from 38 global sites.
Participants
This study included 2606 participants, of whom 1725 were cases with a substance use disorder and 881 healthy controls.
Measurements
This study used the Kaufmann brain age prediction algorithms to generate global and regional brain age estimates using T1 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We used linear mixed effects models to compare global and regional (FreeSurfer lobestrict output) BAG (i.e. predicted minus chronological age) between individuals with one of five primary substance use disorders as well as healthy controls.
Findings
Alcohol use disorder (β = −5.49, t = −5.51, p < 0.001) was associated with higher global BAG, whereas amphetamine-type stimulant use disorder (β = 3.44, t = 2.42, p = 0.02) was associated with lower global BAG in the separate substance-specific models.
Conclusions
People with alcohol use disorder appear to have a higher brain-age gap than people without alcohol use disorder, which is consistent with other evidence of the negative impact of alcohol on the brain.
期刊介绍:
Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines.
Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries.
Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.