实现液体活检研究的分析前最佳实践:BLOODPAC 前景分析。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1002/cpt.3416
Christina M Lockwood, Jason D Merker, Elizabeth Bain, Caroline Compton, Robert L Grossman, Donald Johann, Frederick Jones, Gregory Jones, Matthew Kreifels, Suzanne LeBlang, Jerry S H Lee, John Lyle, Jean-Francois Martini, Lauren Saunders, Howard Scher, Stella Somiari, Mark Stewart, Jacob Vinson, Lauren C Leiman
{"title":"实现液体活检研究的分析前最佳实践:BLOODPAC 前景分析。","authors":"Christina M Lockwood, Jason D Merker, Elizabeth Bain, Caroline Compton, Robert L Grossman, Donald Johann, Frederick Jones, Gregory Jones, Matthew Kreifels, Suzanne LeBlang, Jerry S H Lee, John Lyle, Jean-Francois Martini, Lauren Saunders, Howard Scher, Stella Somiari, Mark Stewart, Jacob Vinson, Lauren C Leiman","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BLOODPAC is a public-private consortium that develops best practices, coordinates clinical and translational research, and manages the BLOODPAC Data Commons to broadly support the liquid biopsy community and accelerate regulatory review to aid patient accessibility. BLOODPAC previously recommended 11 preanalytical minimal technical data elements (MTDEs) for BLOODPAC-sponsored studies and data submitted to BLOODPAC Data Commons. The current landscape analysis evaluates the overlap of the BLOODPAC MTDEs with current best practices, guidelines, and standards documents related to clinical and research liquid biopsy applications. Our findings indicate an existing high degree of concordance among these documents. Where differences exist, the BLOODPAC preanalytical MTDEs can be considered a minimal practicable set for organizations to utilize. These MTDEs were developed following extensive examination of best practices and iterative conversations with the U.S. FDA. BLOODPAC recommends the use of these MTDEs in submissions to data commons and to support liquid biopsy clinical trials and research globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Preanalytical Best Practices for Liquid Biopsy Studies: A BLOODPAC Landscape Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Christina M Lockwood, Jason D Merker, Elizabeth Bain, Caroline Compton, Robert L Grossman, Donald Johann, Frederick Jones, Gregory Jones, Matthew Kreifels, Suzanne LeBlang, Jerry S H Lee, John Lyle, Jean-Francois Martini, Lauren Saunders, Howard Scher, Stella Somiari, Mark Stewart, Jacob Vinson, Lauren C Leiman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.3416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BLOODPAC is a public-private consortium that develops best practices, coordinates clinical and translational research, and manages the BLOODPAC Data Commons to broadly support the liquid biopsy community and accelerate regulatory review to aid patient accessibility. BLOODPAC previously recommended 11 preanalytical minimal technical data elements (MTDEs) for BLOODPAC-sponsored studies and data submitted to BLOODPAC Data Commons. The current landscape analysis evaluates the overlap of the BLOODPAC MTDEs with current best practices, guidelines, and standards documents related to clinical and research liquid biopsy applications. Our findings indicate an existing high degree of concordance among these documents. Where differences exist, the BLOODPAC preanalytical MTDEs can be considered a minimal practicable set for organizations to utilize. These MTDEs were developed following extensive examination of best practices and iterative conversations with the U.S. FDA. BLOODPAC recommends the use of these MTDEs in submissions to data commons and to support liquid biopsy clinical trials and research globally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3416\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

BLOODPAC 是一个公私联盟,负责开发最佳实践、协调临床和转化研究,并管理 BLOODPAC 数据共享中心,以广泛支持液体活检社区,加快监管审查,帮助患者获得治疗。BLOODPAC 之前为 BLOODPAC 赞助的研究和提交给 BLOODPAC 数据共享中心的数据推荐了 11 个分析前最小技术数据元素 (MTDE)。当前的概况分析评估了 BLOODPAC MTDE 与当前临床和研究液体活检应用相关的最佳实践、指南和标准文件的重叠情况。我们的研究结果表明,这些文件之间存在高度的一致性。在存在差异的地方,BLOODPAC 分析前 MTDE 可被视为可供各机构使用的最基本实用工具集。这些 MTDE 是在广泛研究最佳实践并与美国 FDA 反复交流后制定的。BLOODPAC 建议在向数据共享中心提交数据时使用这些 MTDE,并在全球范围内支持液体活检临床试验和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards Preanalytical Best Practices for Liquid Biopsy Studies: A BLOODPAC Landscape Analysis.

BLOODPAC is a public-private consortium that develops best practices, coordinates clinical and translational research, and manages the BLOODPAC Data Commons to broadly support the liquid biopsy community and accelerate regulatory review to aid patient accessibility. BLOODPAC previously recommended 11 preanalytical minimal technical data elements (MTDEs) for BLOODPAC-sponsored studies and data submitted to BLOODPAC Data Commons. The current landscape analysis evaluates the overlap of the BLOODPAC MTDEs with current best practices, guidelines, and standards documents related to clinical and research liquid biopsy applications. Our findings indicate an existing high degree of concordance among these documents. Where differences exist, the BLOODPAC preanalytical MTDEs can be considered a minimal practicable set for organizations to utilize. These MTDEs were developed following extensive examination of best practices and iterative conversations with the U.S. FDA. BLOODPAC recommends the use of these MTDEs in submissions to data commons and to support liquid biopsy clinical trials and research globally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
A Phase I Trial of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Cannabidiol and Tacrolimus. Oxygenation Effects of Antihypertensive Agents in Intensive Care: A Prospective Comparative Study of Nicardipine and Urapidil. Discovering Severe Adverse Reactions From Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions Through Literature Analysis and Electronic Health Record Verification. French-Speaking Network of Pharmacogenetics (RNPGx) Recommendations for Clinical Use of Mavacamten. Clinical and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Evaluations of Adagrasib Drug-Drug Interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1