Abigail Helm , Paige Shaffer , Gerardo Gonzalez , Wenjun Li , Todd Olmstead , Daniel Berlowitz , Elizabeth Epstein , David Smelson
{"title":"一项随机对照试验的方案,该试验审查了针对阿片类药物使用和精神疾病并发症的社会心理强化治疗和标准药物治疗:半分因子随机对照试验。","authors":"Abigail Helm , Paige Shaffer , Gerardo Gonzalez , Wenjun Li , Todd Olmstead , Daniel Berlowitz , Elizabeth Epstein , David Smelson","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The opioid epidemic disproportionately affects individuals with co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders (COD), who often have poor treatment engagement. Multicomponent treatment models are popular solutions to increase treatment access and engagement for those with COD. Maintaining Independence and Sobriety through Systems Integration, Outreach and Networking (MISSION) is a hybrid multicomponent linkage and treatment approach that provides assertive community outreach combined with psychosocial treatment. This protocol paper describes a randomized controlled trial comparing MISSION and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), its multicomponent parts along with MOUD, and MOUD treatment as usual (TAU) to assess improvements in health and social outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study will use a half fractional factorial design and randomize 1000 patients with COD to one of five treatment conditions: (1) the full MISSION intervention plus MOUD; (2–4) a combination of two out of three MISSION components plus MOUD; or (5) TAU. Secondary aims include examination of mechanisms of action, economic evaluation of the implementation of MISSION and/or its components plus MOUD versus TAU, and exploratory predictive modeling to match optimal MISSION parts with patient needs.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This randomized controlled trial will help determine the effectiveness of MISSION (or its parts) and MOUD compared to TAU to improve engagement in treatment, substance use, and mental health symptoms. This trial is the first to compare MISSION and its parts with MOUD versus TAU in a real-world treatment scenario to determine which components are necessary and sufficient to drive treatment outcomes according to patient needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 107668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol of a randomized controlled trial examining psychosocial enhancement and standard medication treatment for co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders: A half fractional factorial randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Abigail Helm , Paige Shaffer , Gerardo Gonzalez , Wenjun Li , Todd Olmstead , Daniel Berlowitz , Elizabeth Epstein , David Smelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The opioid epidemic disproportionately affects individuals with co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders (COD), who often have poor treatment engagement. Multicomponent treatment models are popular solutions to increase treatment access and engagement for those with COD. Maintaining Independence and Sobriety through Systems Integration, Outreach and Networking (MISSION) is a hybrid multicomponent linkage and treatment approach that provides assertive community outreach combined with psychosocial treatment. This protocol paper describes a randomized controlled trial comparing MISSION and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), its multicomponent parts along with MOUD, and MOUD treatment as usual (TAU) to assess improvements in health and social outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study will use a half fractional factorial design and randomize 1000 patients with COD to one of five treatment conditions: (1) the full MISSION intervention plus MOUD; (2–4) a combination of two out of three MISSION components plus MOUD; or (5) TAU. Secondary aims include examination of mechanisms of action, economic evaluation of the implementation of MISSION and/or its components plus MOUD versus TAU, and exploratory predictive modeling to match optimal MISSION parts with patient needs.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This randomized controlled trial will help determine the effectiveness of MISSION (or its parts) and MOUD compared to TAU to improve engagement in treatment, substance use, and mental health symptoms. This trial is the first to compare MISSION and its parts with MOUD versus TAU in a real-world treatment scenario to determine which components are necessary and sufficient to drive treatment outcomes according to patient needs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"145 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107668\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002519\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Protocol of a randomized controlled trial examining psychosocial enhancement and standard medication treatment for co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders: A half fractional factorial randomized controlled trial
Background
The opioid epidemic disproportionately affects individuals with co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders (COD), who often have poor treatment engagement. Multicomponent treatment models are popular solutions to increase treatment access and engagement for those with COD. Maintaining Independence and Sobriety through Systems Integration, Outreach and Networking (MISSION) is a hybrid multicomponent linkage and treatment approach that provides assertive community outreach combined with psychosocial treatment. This protocol paper describes a randomized controlled trial comparing MISSION and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), its multicomponent parts along with MOUD, and MOUD treatment as usual (TAU) to assess improvements in health and social outcomes.
Methods
This study will use a half fractional factorial design and randomize 1000 patients with COD to one of five treatment conditions: (1) the full MISSION intervention plus MOUD; (2–4) a combination of two out of three MISSION components plus MOUD; or (5) TAU. Secondary aims include examination of mechanisms of action, economic evaluation of the implementation of MISSION and/or its components plus MOUD versus TAU, and exploratory predictive modeling to match optimal MISSION parts with patient needs.
Discussion
This randomized controlled trial will help determine the effectiveness of MISSION (or its parts) and MOUD compared to TAU to improve engagement in treatment, substance use, and mental health symptoms. This trial is the first to compare MISSION and its parts with MOUD versus TAU in a real-world treatment scenario to determine which components are necessary and sufficient to drive treatment outcomes according to patient needs.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.