再灌注疗法对特定部位基底动脉闭塞患者的临床疗效。

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1136/jnis-2024-022065
Nina Žakelj, Igor Rigler, Alja Longo, Senta Frol, Janja Pretnar Oblak
{"title":"再灌注疗法对特定部位基底动脉闭塞患者的临床疗效。","authors":"Nina Žakelj, Igor Rigler, Alja Longo, Senta Frol, Janja Pretnar Oblak","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its low incidence, basilar artery occlusion (BAO) remains a major therapeutic challenge since severe disability and death occur in about 80% of patients. Specific site of BAO (proximal, middle, or distal) has rarely been reported as a prognostic factor in reperfusion therapy. We aimed to explore the relationship between site-specific BAO and clinical outcomes in patients treated with reperfusion therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-centre retrospective study of all consecutive patients with acute BAO admitted to the University Medical Centre Ljubljana between January 2013 and August 2022 who were treated with reperfusion therapies. Patients were grouped according to the location of BAO and compared for baseline characteristics, differences in stroke aetiology, type of reperfusion therapy, success of recanalization, and clinical outcome after 90 days evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-sided ANOVA t-tests for continuous measures, Chi-squared (χ2) tests for categorical measures and a multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 103 patients (47% females, median age 74 years; confidence interval (CI) 72 to 98). Proximal BAO was found in 13%, middle in 13%, and distal in 74% of patients. Cardioembolic etiology was more common in distal (=0.01), and atherosclerotic etiology in proximal and middle BAO occlusions (P=0.02). While distal BAO was more likely to be recanalized using intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) compared with other sites of occlusion (P=0.05), we found no difference between different occlusion sites and the success of endovascular treatment (EVT). Lower age (odds ratio (OR) 0.89; CI 0.84 to 0.95; P<0.01) and shorter time to intervention (OR 0.71; CI 0.53 to 0.95; P=0.02), regardless of it being IVT or EVT, were predictors of an excellent clinical outcome (mRS 0-2). Distal occlusion (OR 28; CI 2.7 to 300; p<0.01) was a strong predictor of a favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0-3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prompt reperfusion, regardless of it being IVT or EVT, increases the chance of excellent clinical outcomes in patients with acute BAO. Distal BAO is more often associated with a favorable clinical outcome compared with the proximal and middle segments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of reperfusion therapy in patients with site-specific basilar artery occlusion.\",\"authors\":\"Nina Žakelj, Igor Rigler, Alja Longo, Senta Frol, Janja Pretnar Oblak\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2024-022065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its low incidence, basilar artery occlusion (BAO) remains a major therapeutic challenge since severe disability and death occur in about 80% of patients. Specific site of BAO (proximal, middle, or distal) has rarely been reported as a prognostic factor in reperfusion therapy. We aimed to explore the relationship between site-specific BAO and clinical outcomes in patients treated with reperfusion therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-centre retrospective study of all consecutive patients with acute BAO admitted to the University Medical Centre Ljubljana between January 2013 and August 2022 who were treated with reperfusion therapies. Patients were grouped according to the location of BAO and compared for baseline characteristics, differences in stroke aetiology, type of reperfusion therapy, success of recanalization, and clinical outcome after 90 days evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-sided ANOVA t-tests for continuous measures, Chi-squared (χ2) tests for categorical measures and a multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 103 patients (47% females, median age 74 years; confidence interval (CI) 72 to 98). Proximal BAO was found in 13%, middle in 13%, and distal in 74% of patients. Cardioembolic etiology was more common in distal (=0.01), and atherosclerotic etiology in proximal and middle BAO occlusions (P=0.02). While distal BAO was more likely to be recanalized using intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) compared with other sites of occlusion (P=0.05), we found no difference between different occlusion sites and the success of endovascular treatment (EVT). Lower age (odds ratio (OR) 0.89; CI 0.84 to 0.95; P<0.01) and shorter time to intervention (OR 0.71; CI 0.53 to 0.95; P=0.02), regardless of it being IVT or EVT, were predictors of an excellent clinical outcome (mRS 0-2). Distal occlusion (OR 28; CI 2.7 to 300; p<0.01) was a strong predictor of a favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0-3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prompt reperfusion, regardless of it being IVT or EVT, increases the chance of excellent clinical outcomes in patients with acute BAO. Distal BAO is more often associated with a favorable clinical outcome compared with the proximal and middle segments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022065\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022065","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基底动脉闭塞(BAO)尽管发病率很低,但仍是治疗上的一大难题,因为约 80% 的患者会出现严重残疾和死亡。很少有报道称 BAO 的特定部位(近端、中段或远端)是再灌注治疗的预后因素。我们旨在探讨接受再灌注治疗的患者中特定部位 BAO 与临床预后之间的关系:我们对卢布尔雅那大学医疗中心在 2013 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月期间收治的所有接受再灌注治疗的连续急性 BAO 患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。根据 BAO 的位置对患者进行分组,并比较基线特征、中风病因的差异、再灌注疗法的类型、再通血管的成功率以及 90 天后通过改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分评估的临床结果。统计分析采用双侧方差分析 t 检验连续计量,Chi-squared (χ2)检验分类计量,以及多变量序数逻辑回归分析:研究共纳入 103 名患者(女性占 47%,中位年龄 74 岁;置信区间 (CI) 72 至 98)。13%的患者发现了近端 BAO,13%的患者发现了中端 BAO,74%的患者发现了远端 BAO。心栓塞病因在远端更常见(=0.01),而动脉粥样硬化病因在近端和中间 BAO 闭塞中更常见(P=0.02)。与其他部位的闭塞相比,远端 BAO 更有可能通过静脉溶栓(IVT)再通(P=0.05),但我们发现不同闭塞部位与血管内治疗(EVT)的成功率之间没有差异。年龄较小(几率比(OR)0.89;CI 0.84 至 0.95;PConclusion):无论是 IVT 还是 EVT,及时再灌注都能增加急性 BAO 患者获得良好临床疗效的机会。与近端和中间段相比,远端 BAO 更容易获得良好的临床预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical outcomes of reperfusion therapy in patients with site-specific basilar artery occlusion.

Background: Despite its low incidence, basilar artery occlusion (BAO) remains a major therapeutic challenge since severe disability and death occur in about 80% of patients. Specific site of BAO (proximal, middle, or distal) has rarely been reported as a prognostic factor in reperfusion therapy. We aimed to explore the relationship between site-specific BAO and clinical outcomes in patients treated with reperfusion therapies.

Methods: We performed a single-centre retrospective study of all consecutive patients with acute BAO admitted to the University Medical Centre Ljubljana between January 2013 and August 2022 who were treated with reperfusion therapies. Patients were grouped according to the location of BAO and compared for baseline characteristics, differences in stroke aetiology, type of reperfusion therapy, success of recanalization, and clinical outcome after 90 days evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-sided ANOVA t-tests for continuous measures, Chi-squared (χ2) tests for categorical measures and a multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis.

Results: The study included 103 patients (47% females, median age 74 years; confidence interval (CI) 72 to 98). Proximal BAO was found in 13%, middle in 13%, and distal in 74% of patients. Cardioembolic etiology was more common in distal (=0.01), and atherosclerotic etiology in proximal and middle BAO occlusions (P=0.02). While distal BAO was more likely to be recanalized using intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) compared with other sites of occlusion (P=0.05), we found no difference between different occlusion sites and the success of endovascular treatment (EVT). Lower age (odds ratio (OR) 0.89; CI 0.84 to 0.95; P<0.01) and shorter time to intervention (OR 0.71; CI 0.53 to 0.95; P=0.02), regardless of it being IVT or EVT, were predictors of an excellent clinical outcome (mRS 0-2). Distal occlusion (OR 28; CI 2.7 to 300; p<0.01) was a strong predictor of a favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0-3).

Conclusion: Prompt reperfusion, regardless of it being IVT or EVT, increases the chance of excellent clinical outcomes in patients with acute BAO. Distal BAO is more often associated with a favorable clinical outcome compared with the proximal and middle segments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
期刊最新文献
Management of a fractured microcatheter during middle meningeal artery embolization. Onyx embolization for salvage hemostasis after intraoperative rupture. Removal of errant coils using the Tigertriever-13. Rescue techniques for intravascular mechanical obstruction following Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device detachment. The retrograde pressure cooker technique for transvenous embolization of a residual arteriovenous malformation following stereotactic radiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1