马基雅维利主义与亲密伴侣施暴:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Trauma Violence & Abuse Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1177/15248380241270027
Lisa K White, Natasha Valos, Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia, Megan L Willis
{"title":"马基雅维利主义与亲密伴侣施暴:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Lisa K White, Natasha Valos, Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia, Megan L Willis","doi":"10.1177/15248380241270027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the size of the relationship between Machiavellianism and intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration. Further, we explored whether the strength of this relationship varied depending on IPV type (i.e., physical, psychological, sexual, and cyber), and perpetrator gender. Systematic searches of Medline Complete, PsycInfo, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were conducted on July 4, 2023. Studies were included if they were a peer-reviewed published paper or unpublished dissertation, in English, included a measure of Machiavellianism and IPV perpetration, and reported the relationship between these variables. Study quality was assessed using the AXIS tool. Nineteen studies (<i>N</i> = 9,464) were included in a random-effects meta-analysis revealing a significant, weak, positive correlation between Machiavellianism and IPV perpetration (<i>r</i> = .16, 95% CI [0.11, 0.21], <i>p</i> < .001). Machiavellianism had a significant, weak, positive relationship with cyber (<i>r</i> = .25, 95% CI [0.17, 0.32], <i>p</i> < .001), psychological (<i>r</i> = .20, 95% CI [0.15, 0.24], <i>p</i> < .001), and sexual IPV (<i>r</i> = .10, 95% CI [0.02, 0.19], <i>p</i> = .020). No significant relationship was found for physical IPV. There was no significant difference in the strength of the relationship between women and men. These findings are limited by the measures being self-report, heterogeneity across studies, and the cross-sectional nature of the included studies which limits the understanding of causal pathways. Nonetheless, this meta-analysis shows a link between Machiavellianism and IPV perpetration, and future research should examine how this knowledge may be used to reduce IPV perpetration.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machiavellianism and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa K White, Natasha Valos, Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia, Megan L Willis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248380241270027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the size of the relationship between Machiavellianism and intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration. Further, we explored whether the strength of this relationship varied depending on IPV type (i.e., physical, psychological, sexual, and cyber), and perpetrator gender. Systematic searches of Medline Complete, PsycInfo, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were conducted on July 4, 2023. Studies were included if they were a peer-reviewed published paper or unpublished dissertation, in English, included a measure of Machiavellianism and IPV perpetration, and reported the relationship between these variables. Study quality was assessed using the AXIS tool. Nineteen studies (<i>N</i> = 9,464) were included in a random-effects meta-analysis revealing a significant, weak, positive correlation between Machiavellianism and IPV perpetration (<i>r</i> = .16, 95% CI [0.11, 0.21], <i>p</i> < .001). Machiavellianism had a significant, weak, positive relationship with cyber (<i>r</i> = .25, 95% CI [0.17, 0.32], <i>p</i> < .001), psychological (<i>r</i> = .20, 95% CI [0.15, 0.24], <i>p</i> < .001), and sexual IPV (<i>r</i> = .10, 95% CI [0.02, 0.19], <i>p</i> = .020). No significant relationship was found for physical IPV. There was no significant difference in the strength of the relationship between women and men. These findings are limited by the measures being self-report, heterogeneity across studies, and the cross-sectional nature of the included studies which limits the understanding of causal pathways. Nonetheless, this meta-analysis shows a link between Machiavellianism and IPV perpetration, and future research should examine how this knowledge may be used to reduce IPV perpetration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241270027\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241270027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述和荟萃分析估计了马基雅维利主义与亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)实施之间的关系。此外,我们还探讨了这种关系的强度是否会因 IPV 类型(即身体、心理、性和网络)和施暴者性别的不同而有所变化。我们于 2023 年 7 月 4 日对 Medline Complete、PsycInfo、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了系统检索。纳入的研究必须是经同行评审的已发表论文或未发表的学位论文,语言为英语,包含对马基雅维利主义和 IPV 施暴行为的测量,并报告了这些变量之间的关系。研究质量采用 AXIS 工具进行评估。19项研究(N = 9,464)被纳入随机效应荟萃分析,结果显示马基雅维利主义与IPV实施之间存在显著、微弱的正相关(r = .16,95% CI [0.11,0.21],p r = .25,95% CI [0.17,0.32],p r = .20,95% CI [0.15,0.24],p r = .10,95% CI [0.02,0.19],p = .020)。在肢体 IPV 方面没有发现明显的关系。男女之间的关系强度没有明显差异。这些研究结果受到以下因素的限制:所采用的测量方法是自我报告,不同研究之间存在异质性,以及所纳入研究的横断面性质限制了对因果关系的理解。尽管如此,这项荟萃分析表明了马基雅维利主义与 IPV 施行之间的联系,未来的研究应探讨如何利用这些知识来减少 IPV 施行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machiavellianism and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the size of the relationship between Machiavellianism and intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration. Further, we explored whether the strength of this relationship varied depending on IPV type (i.e., physical, psychological, sexual, and cyber), and perpetrator gender. Systematic searches of Medline Complete, PsycInfo, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were conducted on July 4, 2023. Studies were included if they were a peer-reviewed published paper or unpublished dissertation, in English, included a measure of Machiavellianism and IPV perpetration, and reported the relationship between these variables. Study quality was assessed using the AXIS tool. Nineteen studies (N = 9,464) were included in a random-effects meta-analysis revealing a significant, weak, positive correlation between Machiavellianism and IPV perpetration (r = .16, 95% CI [0.11, 0.21], p < .001). Machiavellianism had a significant, weak, positive relationship with cyber (r = .25, 95% CI [0.17, 0.32], p < .001), psychological (r = .20, 95% CI [0.15, 0.24], p < .001), and sexual IPV (r = .10, 95% CI [0.02, 0.19], p = .020). No significant relationship was found for physical IPV. There was no significant difference in the strength of the relationship between women and men. These findings are limited by the measures being self-report, heterogeneity across studies, and the cross-sectional nature of the included studies which limits the understanding of causal pathways. Nonetheless, this meta-analysis shows a link between Machiavellianism and IPV perpetration, and future research should examine how this knowledge may be used to reduce IPV perpetration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the Landscape of Trauma-Informed Care in Social Work: A Critical Scoping Review. The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Cognitive Control Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies Protective and Promotive Factors in Migrant and Refugee Children Facing Violence: A Systematic Review Psychological Predictors of Recidivism for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: A Systematic Scoping Review Outcomes Associated with Arrest for Domestic Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1