在额外的单人任务中,工作记忆负荷不会干扰分心物抑制。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY Attention Perception & Psychophysics Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.3758/s13414-024-02940-4
Francisco Vicente-Conesa, Ignacio Castillejo, Miguel A. Vadillo
{"title":"在额外的单人任务中,工作记忆负荷不会干扰分心物抑制。","authors":"Francisco Vicente-Conesa,&nbsp;Ignacio Castillejo,&nbsp;Miguel A. Vadillo","doi":"10.3758/s13414-024-02940-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the last decade, the additional singleton task has been widely used to study visual statistical learning. In this paradigm, participants are instructed to find a target while ignoring a series of distractors. In some trials, a salient singleton distractor is added to the search display, making the task more difficult. However, if the singleton appears more frequently in one particular location of the display, participants eventually learn to suppress attention towards this location. It has been suggested that this type of learning is probably implicit and independent of working memory (WM) resources. To our knowledge, only one study has explored the impact of WM in suppression effect (Gao &amp; Theeuwes, <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review, 27,</i> 96–104, 2020). However, there are reasons to suspect that the amount and type of WM load used in that study may have been suboptimal to detect any effects on distractor suppression. The aim of the present study was to explore the impact of WM load on distractor suppression addressing these issues. Contrary to our expectations, our results confirm that this type of learning is indeed highly resilient even to strong manipulations of WM load.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"86 6","pages":"2003 - 2012"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working memory load does not interfere with distractor suppression in the additional singleton task\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Vicente-Conesa,&nbsp;Ignacio Castillejo,&nbsp;Miguel A. Vadillo\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13414-024-02940-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Over the last decade, the additional singleton task has been widely used to study visual statistical learning. In this paradigm, participants are instructed to find a target while ignoring a series of distractors. In some trials, a salient singleton distractor is added to the search display, making the task more difficult. However, if the singleton appears more frequently in one particular location of the display, participants eventually learn to suppress attention towards this location. It has been suggested that this type of learning is probably implicit and independent of working memory (WM) resources. To our knowledge, only one study has explored the impact of WM in suppression effect (Gao &amp; Theeuwes, <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review, 27,</i> 96–104, 2020). However, there are reasons to suspect that the amount and type of WM load used in that study may have been suboptimal to detect any effects on distractor suppression. The aim of the present study was to explore the impact of WM load on distractor suppression addressing these issues. Contrary to our expectations, our results confirm that this type of learning is indeed highly resilient even to strong manipulations of WM load.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"volume\":\"86 6\",\"pages\":\"2003 - 2012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-024-02940-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-024-02940-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,附加单子任务被广泛用于研究视觉统计学习。在这一范例中,参与者被要求在忽略一系列干扰物的同时找到一个目标。在某些试验中,搜索显示屏上会增加一个突出的单体分心物,从而增加了任务的难度。但是,如果单个干扰物更频繁地出现在显示屏的某一特定位置,参与者最终就会学会抑制对这一位置的注意。有人认为,这种学习可能是内隐的,与工作记忆(WM)资源无关。据我们所知,只有一项研究探讨了工作记忆对抑制效果的影响(Gao 和 Theeuwes,《心理学通报与评论》,27, 96-104, 2020 年)。然而,我们有理由怀疑,该研究中使用的 WM 负荷的数量和类型可能并不理想,无法检测出对分心抑制的影响。本研究的目的就是针对这些问题,探讨 WM 负荷对分心抑制的影响。与我们的预期相反,我们的研究结果证实,这种类型的学习确实具有很强的恢复能力,即使是对 WM 负荷的强烈操纵也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Working memory load does not interfere with distractor suppression in the additional singleton task

Over the last decade, the additional singleton task has been widely used to study visual statistical learning. In this paradigm, participants are instructed to find a target while ignoring a series of distractors. In some trials, a salient singleton distractor is added to the search display, making the task more difficult. However, if the singleton appears more frequently in one particular location of the display, participants eventually learn to suppress attention towards this location. It has been suggested that this type of learning is probably implicit and independent of working memory (WM) resources. To our knowledge, only one study has explored the impact of WM in suppression effect (Gao & Theeuwes, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 96–104, 2020). However, there are reasons to suspect that the amount and type of WM load used in that study may have been suboptimal to detect any effects on distractor suppression. The aim of the present study was to explore the impact of WM load on distractor suppression addressing these issues. Contrary to our expectations, our results confirm that this type of learning is indeed highly resilient even to strong manipulations of WM load.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
期刊最新文献
Disentangling decision errors from action execution in mouse-tracking studies: The case of effect-based action control. Parafoveal N400 effects reveal that word skipping is associated with deeper lexical processing in the presence of context-driven expectations. Correction to: On the relationship between spatial attention and semantics in the context of a Stroop paradigm. Can the left hand benefit from being right? The influence of body side on perceived grasping ability. Gaze-action coupling, gaze-gesture coupling, and exogenous attraction of gaze in dyadic interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1