确定我们的期望:委托专业活动评估中的差异。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Surgical Education Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.07.025
{"title":"确定我们的期望:委托专业活动评估中的差异。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.07.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>To determine the ability of surgical trainees and faculty to correctly interpret entrustability of a resident learner in a modeled patient care scenario.</p></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><p>Prospective study utilizing a web-based survey including 4 previously-recorded short videos of resident learners targeted to specific levels of the American Board of Surgery's (ABS) Entrustment Scale. Respondents were asked to choose the entrustment level that best corresponded to their observations of the learner in the video. Responses were subcategorized by low and high entrustment.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>Online, utilizing the Qualtrics survey platform.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><p>Survey targeting US surgical trainees and surgical faculty via email and social media. We received 31 complete responses and 2 responses which completed &gt; 1 video assessment question without demographic information (n = 33). Respondents included 10 trainees (32%) and 21 attending surgeons (68%).</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Neither faculty nor trainees readily identified the targeted entrustment level for Question 1 (preoperative care of a patient with acute appendicitis with high entrustment, 36% correct), though evaluations of the remaining questions (2 through 4) demonstrated more accuracy (70, 84, and 75% correct, respectively). Faculty were more readily able than trainees to identify low entrustment (level Limited Participation) in intraoperative inguinal hernia repair (95% vs 60%, p = 0.03). After subcategorization to high and low entrustment, both residents and faculty were able to accurately identify entrustment 95% overall.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Both trainees and attending surgeons were able to identify high- and low-performing residents on short video demonstrations using the ABS EPA entrustment scale. This provides additional evidence in support of the need for frequent observations of EPAs to account for the variability in raters’ perceptions in addition to complexity of clinical scenarios. Frame-of-reference training via a video-based platform may also be beneficial for both residents and faculty as an ongoing EPA implementation strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framing our Expectations: Variability in Entrustable Professional Activity Assessments\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.07.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>To determine the ability of surgical trainees and faculty to correctly interpret entrustability of a resident learner in a modeled patient care scenario.</p></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><p>Prospective study utilizing a web-based survey including 4 previously-recorded short videos of resident learners targeted to specific levels of the American Board of Surgery's (ABS) Entrustment Scale. Respondents were asked to choose the entrustment level that best corresponded to their observations of the learner in the video. Responses were subcategorized by low and high entrustment.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>Online, utilizing the Qualtrics survey platform.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><p>Survey targeting US surgical trainees and surgical faculty via email and social media. We received 31 complete responses and 2 responses which completed &gt; 1 video assessment question without demographic information (n = 33). Respondents included 10 trainees (32%) and 21 attending surgeons (68%).</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Neither faculty nor trainees readily identified the targeted entrustment level for Question 1 (preoperative care of a patient with acute appendicitis with high entrustment, 36% correct), though evaluations of the remaining questions (2 through 4) demonstrated more accuracy (70, 84, and 75% correct, respectively). Faculty were more readily able than trainees to identify low entrustment (level Limited Participation) in intraoperative inguinal hernia repair (95% vs 60%, p = 0.03). After subcategorization to high and low entrustment, both residents and faculty were able to accurately identify entrustment 95% overall.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Both trainees and attending surgeons were able to identify high- and low-performing residents on short video demonstrations using the ABS EPA entrustment scale. This provides additional evidence in support of the need for frequent observations of EPAs to account for the variability in raters’ perceptions in addition to complexity of clinical scenarios. Frame-of-reference training via a video-based platform may also be beneficial for both residents and faculty as an ongoing EPA implementation strategy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424003490\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424003490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定外科学员和教师在模拟患者护理场景中正确解释住院医师学员的委托能力:设计:前瞻性研究,利用网络调查,包括 4 个先前录制的住院医师学习者短片,针对美国外科学委员会(ABS)委托程度量表的特定级别。受访者被要求选择与他们在视频中观察到的学习者最相符的委托等级。回答按低委托和高委托进行细分:在线调查,使用 Qualtrics 调查平台:通过电子邮件和社交媒体对美国外科学员和外科教员进行调查。我们收到了 31 份完整的回复和 2 份完成了 > 1 个视频评估问题但未提供人口统计学信息的回复(n = 33)。受访者包括 10 名受训人员(32%)和 21 名主治医生(68%):教职员工和受训人员均未明确问题 1 的目标委托级别(对急性阑尾炎患者的术前护理委托级别较高,正确率为 36%),但对其余问题(2 至 4)的评估显示出较高的准确率(正确率分别为 70%、84% 和 75%)。在腹股沟疝修补术中,教员比学员更容易识别低度委托(有限参与级别)(95% 对 60%,P = 0.03)。在对高委托和低委托进行细分后,住院医师和教职员工总体上都能准确识别出95%的委托:结论:学员和主治医生都能使用 ABS EPA 委托量表在短视频演示中识别出表现优异和表现不佳的住院医师。这提供了更多证据,证明除了临床场景的复杂性外,还需要经常观察EPA,以考虑评分者感知的差异性。作为一项持续的 EPA 实施策略,通过视频平台进行参照框架培训可能对住院医师和教师都有益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Framing our Expectations: Variability in Entrustable Professional Activity Assessments

OBJECTIVE

To determine the ability of surgical trainees and faculty to correctly interpret entrustability of a resident learner in a modeled patient care scenario.

DESIGN

Prospective study utilizing a web-based survey including 4 previously-recorded short videos of resident learners targeted to specific levels of the American Board of Surgery's (ABS) Entrustment Scale. Respondents were asked to choose the entrustment level that best corresponded to their observations of the learner in the video. Responses were subcategorized by low and high entrustment.

SETTING

Online, utilizing the Qualtrics survey platform.

PARTICIPANTS

Survey targeting US surgical trainees and surgical faculty via email and social media. We received 31 complete responses and 2 responses which completed > 1 video assessment question without demographic information (n = 33). Respondents included 10 trainees (32%) and 21 attending surgeons (68%).

RESULTS

Neither faculty nor trainees readily identified the targeted entrustment level for Question 1 (preoperative care of a patient with acute appendicitis with high entrustment, 36% correct), though evaluations of the remaining questions (2 through 4) demonstrated more accuracy (70, 84, and 75% correct, respectively). Faculty were more readily able than trainees to identify low entrustment (level Limited Participation) in intraoperative inguinal hernia repair (95% vs 60%, p = 0.03). After subcategorization to high and low entrustment, both residents and faculty were able to accurately identify entrustment 95% overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Both trainees and attending surgeons were able to identify high- and low-performing residents on short video demonstrations using the ABS EPA entrustment scale. This provides additional evidence in support of the need for frequent observations of EPAs to account for the variability in raters’ perceptions in addition to complexity of clinical scenarios. Frame-of-reference training via a video-based platform may also be beneficial for both residents and faculty as an ongoing EPA implementation strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
期刊最新文献
Resident-Applicant Buddy Program Increases Applicant Interest and Program Transparency Promoting Surgical Resident Well-being Through Therapist-Facilitated Discussion Groups: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Geographic Match Location Patterns: Comparison of Pre and Post Virtual Interviews General Surgery Residency Applicant Perspectives on Alternative Residency Interview Models with Implementation of an Optional Second Look Day Implementation and Evaluation of an Academic Development Rotation for Surgery Residents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1