深入咨询:大脑深层定向(DBR)作为一种潜在的工具,用于转变创伤治疗师的反移情反应

Anna Gerge
{"title":"深入咨询:大脑深层定向(DBR)作为一种潜在的工具,用于转变创伤治疗师的反移情反应","authors":"Anna Gerge","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To (<em>i</em>) explore whether or not the deep brain reorienting (DBR) method ameliorates countertransference reactions and distress in psychotherapists who provide trauma therapies and (<em>ii</em>) describe specific burdens on psychotherapists, who work with severe traumatization and dissociation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All participants in this small, naturalistic study (<em>n</em> = 16) were experienced trauma psychotherapists who were in ongoing consultations. When they raised relational difficulties and/or distress related to their clinical work, they were offered an opportunity to process their reactions with DBR during the consultation hours. The participants’ self-assessed experiences of discomfort before and after DBR processing were measured with the <em>Subjective Units of Distress Scale</em> (SUDS). They also provided verbal and written statements regarding their experiences after DBR intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SUDS ratings/values related to participants’ experiences of discomfort before and after the DBR moment were all lowered (<em>p</em> = 0.00003, binomial calculation). Also lowered after the DBR moment (<em>p</em> = 0.00024, binomial calculation) were ratings related to how disturbing it was for the participants after their clients left their last session – compared to how disturbing the participants thought that it <em>would be</em> when their clients would leave the next session. These subjective ratings were aligned with the participants’ summarized verbal and written statements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Preliminary results are promising. Potentially, DBR seems to diminish trauma-generated countertransference and related reactions. Use of DBR during consultation must be further researched; interventions for ameliorating countertransference reactions have been requested in contemporary research. New knowledge must be further acquired and implemented in clinical work and consultation/supervision – regarding ways in which traumas affect the brain's functional networks and subcortical regions in those suffering severe traumatization (and vicariously their therapists). Whether or not DBR is a helpful method during consultations (among more inexperienced colleagues) should be investigated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-depth consultation: Deep brain reorienting (DBR) as a potential tool for transforming countertransference reactions in trauma therapists\",\"authors\":\"Anna Gerge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To (<em>i</em>) explore whether or not the deep brain reorienting (DBR) method ameliorates countertransference reactions and distress in psychotherapists who provide trauma therapies and (<em>ii</em>) describe specific burdens on psychotherapists, who work with severe traumatization and dissociation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All participants in this small, naturalistic study (<em>n</em> = 16) were experienced trauma psychotherapists who were in ongoing consultations. When they raised relational difficulties and/or distress related to their clinical work, they were offered an opportunity to process their reactions with DBR during the consultation hours. The participants’ self-assessed experiences of discomfort before and after DBR processing were measured with the <em>Subjective Units of Distress Scale</em> (SUDS). They also provided verbal and written statements regarding their experiences after DBR intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SUDS ratings/values related to participants’ experiences of discomfort before and after the DBR moment were all lowered (<em>p</em> = 0.00003, binomial calculation). Also lowered after the DBR moment (<em>p</em> = 0.00024, binomial calculation) were ratings related to how disturbing it was for the participants after their clients left their last session – compared to how disturbing the participants thought that it <em>would be</em> when their clients would leave the next session. These subjective ratings were aligned with the participants’ summarized verbal and written statements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Preliminary results are promising. Potentially, DBR seems to diminish trauma-generated countertransference and related reactions. Use of DBR during consultation must be further researched; interventions for ameliorating countertransference reactions have been requested in contemporary research. New knowledge must be further acquired and implemented in clinical work and consultation/supervision – regarding ways in which traumas affect the brain's functional networks and subcortical regions in those suffering severe traumatization (and vicariously their therapists). Whether or not DBR is a helpful method during consultations (among more inexperienced colleagues) should be investigated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨(i)大脑深层定向法(DBR)是否能改善提供创伤治疗的心理治疗师的反移情反应和困扰;(ii)描述心理治疗师在处理严重创伤和解离问题时的具体负担。方法这项小型自然主义研究的所有参与者(n = 16)都是经验丰富的创伤心理治疗师,他们正在接受咨询。当他们提出与临床工作相关的关系困难和/或困扰时,他们有机会在咨询时间内用 DBR 处理自己的反应。我们使用主观苦恼单位量表(SUDS)测量了参与者在 DBR 处理前后自我评估的不适体验。他们还就 DBR 干预后的体验提供了口头和书面陈述。结果SUDS 评分/值与参与者在 DBR 处理前后的不适体验有关,均有所降低(p = 0.00003,二项式计算)。在 DBR 阶段之后,与参与者认为客户离开下一阶段时的困扰程度相关的评分也降低了(p = 0.00024,二项式计算)。这些主观评分与参与者的口头和书面总结一致。DBR似乎有可能减少创伤产生的反移情和相关反应。必须进一步研究在咨询过程中使用 DBR 的问题;当代研究已要求采取干预措施来改善反移情反应。必须进一步获取新知识,并在临床工作和咨询/督导中实施--关于创伤如何影响那些遭受严重创伤的人(以及他们的治疗师)的大脑功能网络和皮层下区域。在咨询过程中,DBR 是否是一种有用的方法(对于缺乏经验的同事而言),还需要进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In-depth consultation: Deep brain reorienting (DBR) as a potential tool for transforming countertransference reactions in trauma therapists

Objective

To (i) explore whether or not the deep brain reorienting (DBR) method ameliorates countertransference reactions and distress in psychotherapists who provide trauma therapies and (ii) describe specific burdens on psychotherapists, who work with severe traumatization and dissociation.

Methods

All participants in this small, naturalistic study (n = 16) were experienced trauma psychotherapists who were in ongoing consultations. When they raised relational difficulties and/or distress related to their clinical work, they were offered an opportunity to process their reactions with DBR during the consultation hours. The participants’ self-assessed experiences of discomfort before and after DBR processing were measured with the Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS). They also provided verbal and written statements regarding their experiences after DBR intervention.

Results

SUDS ratings/values related to participants’ experiences of discomfort before and after the DBR moment were all lowered (p = 0.00003, binomial calculation). Also lowered after the DBR moment (p = 0.00024, binomial calculation) were ratings related to how disturbing it was for the participants after their clients left their last session – compared to how disturbing the participants thought that it would be when their clients would leave the next session. These subjective ratings were aligned with the participants’ summarized verbal and written statements.

Conclusions

Preliminary results are promising. Potentially, DBR seems to diminish trauma-generated countertransference and related reactions. Use of DBR during consultation must be further researched; interventions for ameliorating countertransference reactions have been requested in contemporary research. New knowledge must be further acquired and implemented in clinical work and consultation/supervision – regarding ways in which traumas affect the brain's functional networks and subcortical regions in those suffering severe traumatization (and vicariously their therapists). Whether or not DBR is a helpful method during consultations (among more inexperienced colleagues) should be investigated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories for Complex PTSD – A pilot quasi-experimental study from a wellness centre in India Adverse childhood experiences and dissociation among Italian public psychology service users Résistance et trauma: introduire l'existence Exploring the interplay between dreams, Early Maladaptive Schemas and demanding parenting style in Malaysia: A qualitative study Parent-Child EMDR therapy for children aged 0–4 years: Protocol, pilot-data, and case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1