利用钻孔破裂进行原位应力分析的多轴向破坏标准:审查现有方法并开发经验替代方法

IF 7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105864
Maciej Trzeciak, Hiroki Sone
{"title":"利用钻孔破裂进行原位应力分析的多轴向破坏标准:审查现有方法并开发经验替代方法","authors":"Maciej Trzeciak,&nbsp;Hiroki Sone","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Analysis of compressive wellbore failure, or breakouts, is one of the primary methods of constraining the maximum horizontal stress in deep boreholes. To estimate stress using the observation of breakouts, one needs to measure the breakout width from image logs and use a failure theory to predict the stress that led to the development of the measured breakout. Most commonly, Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion has been used which disregards the influence of intermediate stress on strength. Hence, various polyaxial criteria have been proposed to include this effect. Here, we first review some selected polyaxial criteria: Drucker–Prager, Mogi, Modified Wiebols–Cook, and Modified Lade, and we conclude that their application in breakout analysis may be cumbersome and often unreliable. One reason for these problems is that the criteria are defined using stress invariants, while the stress estimation is most easily performed and analyzed in the principal stress space. Therefore, an alternative is to define the polyaxial criterion as a simple relation between maximum and intermediate stresses. We propose to define such an empirical criterion as a second order polynomial which fits trends observed in polyaxial laboratory strength data. Such approach allows to limit strength overestimation, often associated with the use of previous polyaxial criteria, and to easily relate uncertainties in strength estimation to uncertainty in maximum horizontal stress prediction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54941,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 105864"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polyaxial failure criteria for in situ stress analysis using borehole breakouts: Review of existing methods and development of an empirical alternative\",\"authors\":\"Maciej Trzeciak,&nbsp;Hiroki Sone\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Analysis of compressive wellbore failure, or breakouts, is one of the primary methods of constraining the maximum horizontal stress in deep boreholes. To estimate stress using the observation of breakouts, one needs to measure the breakout width from image logs and use a failure theory to predict the stress that led to the development of the measured breakout. Most commonly, Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion has been used which disregards the influence of intermediate stress on strength. Hence, various polyaxial criteria have been proposed to include this effect. Here, we first review some selected polyaxial criteria: Drucker–Prager, Mogi, Modified Wiebols–Cook, and Modified Lade, and we conclude that their application in breakout analysis may be cumbersome and often unreliable. One reason for these problems is that the criteria are defined using stress invariants, while the stress estimation is most easily performed and analyzed in the principal stress space. Therefore, an alternative is to define the polyaxial criterion as a simple relation between maximum and intermediate stresses. We propose to define such an empirical criterion as a second order polynomial which fits trends observed in polyaxial laboratory strength data. Such approach allows to limit strength overestimation, often associated with the use of previous polyaxial criteria, and to easily relate uncertainties in strength estimation to uncertainty in maximum horizontal stress prediction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences\",\"volume\":\"182 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160924002296\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160924002296","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析压缩性井筒失效或破裂是限制深井眼最大水平应力的主要方法之一。要通过观察破裂来估算应力,需要根据图像测井仪测量破裂宽度,并使用失效理论来预测导致测量破裂的应力。最常用的是莫尔-库仑失效准则,它忽略了中间应力对强度的影响。因此,人们提出了各种多轴判据,以纳入这种影响。在此,我们首先回顾一些选定的多轴准则:我们得出的结论是,在断裂分析中应用这些准则可能很麻烦,而且往往不可靠。造成这些问题的原因之一是,这些标准是使用应力不变式定义的,而应力估计最容易在主应力空间中进行和分析。因此,另一种方法是将多轴标准定义为最大应力和中间应力之间的简单关系。我们建议将这种经验准则定义为二阶多项式,它符合多轴实验室强度数据中观察到的趋势。这种方法可以限制强度过高估计,而强度过高估计通常与使用以前的多轴标准有关,并且可以轻松地将强度估算的不确定性与最大水平应力预测的不确定性联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polyaxial failure criteria for in situ stress analysis using borehole breakouts: Review of existing methods and development of an empirical alternative

Analysis of compressive wellbore failure, or breakouts, is one of the primary methods of constraining the maximum horizontal stress in deep boreholes. To estimate stress using the observation of breakouts, one needs to measure the breakout width from image logs and use a failure theory to predict the stress that led to the development of the measured breakout. Most commonly, Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion has been used which disregards the influence of intermediate stress on strength. Hence, various polyaxial criteria have been proposed to include this effect. Here, we first review some selected polyaxial criteria: Drucker–Prager, Mogi, Modified Wiebols–Cook, and Modified Lade, and we conclude that their application in breakout analysis may be cumbersome and often unreliable. One reason for these problems is that the criteria are defined using stress invariants, while the stress estimation is most easily performed and analyzed in the principal stress space. Therefore, an alternative is to define the polyaxial criterion as a simple relation between maximum and intermediate stresses. We propose to define such an empirical criterion as a second order polynomial which fits trends observed in polyaxial laboratory strength data. Such approach allows to limit strength overestimation, often associated with the use of previous polyaxial criteria, and to easily relate uncertainties in strength estimation to uncertainty in maximum horizontal stress prediction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
196
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences focuses on original research, new developments, site measurements, and case studies within the fields of rock mechanics and rock engineering. Serving as an international platform, it showcases high-quality papers addressing rock mechanics and the application of its principles and techniques in mining and civil engineering projects situated on or within rock masses. These projects encompass a wide range, including slopes, open-pit mines, quarries, shafts, tunnels, caverns, underground mines, metro systems, dams, hydro-electric stations, geothermal energy, petroleum engineering, and radioactive waste disposal. The journal welcomes submissions on various topics, with particular interest in theoretical advancements, analytical and numerical methods, rock testing, site investigation, and case studies.
期刊最新文献
Mutual feedback and fracturing effect of hydraulic fractures in composite coal−rock reservoirs under different fracturing layer sequence conditions Experimental study on the interaction mechanism of two dynamic cracks under blasting loading Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical (THM) wellbore analysis under sub-zero CO2 injection The effect of strain rate on inelastic strain development in porous sandstones deformed under reservoir conditions Integration of automatic discontinuity identification and multi-scale hierarchical modeling for stability analysis of highly-jointed rock slopes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1