体外和原位侵蚀挑战是否会改变通用粘合剂的粘合性能?

IF 3.2 3区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103809
{"title":"体外和原位侵蚀挑战是否会改变通用粘合剂的粘合性能?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate microtensile bond strengths (μTBS), nanoleakage (NL), and degree of conversion (DC) of two universal adhesives, using etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etch (SE) strategies on eroded dentin submitted to in vitro and in situ erosive challenges.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dentin blocks were prepared from 120 human molars and categorized based on dentin condition (sound, in vitro eroded, and in situ eroded), adhesive system (Scotchbond Universal [SBU] and Zip bond Universal [ZIP]), and adhesive strategy (ER and SE). In the in situ erosive challenge, 20 volunteers wore acrylic resin palatal devices with dentin blocks, immersing them in cola soft drink for 90 s, six times daily for 15 days. The same erosive protocol was used in vitro, followed by rinsing and remineralization. Sound dentin blocks served as controls. Afterward, all dentin blocks were restored with composite resin and sectioned into resin-dentin bonded sticks for μTBS, NL, and DC assessments. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sound dentin exhibited the highest μTBS and DC values and the lowest NL values, while in situ eroded dentin showed the lowest μTBS and DC values and the highest NL values (p = 0.000001). While some differences in the μTBS values were observed between universal adhesives when evaluated on sound dentin (p = 0.0001), no significant differences between adhesives were observed when tested on in vitro and in situ eroded dentin. Regarding NL and DC, no significant differences were found between SBU and ZIP, as well as among adhesive strategies (p &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Erosion in dentin, especially under in situ conditions, presents significant challenges to the adhesion of restorative materials. The choice of an effective adhesive system is crucial, as dentin eroded in situ showed lower adhesion strength and greater nanoleakage. These results highlight the need for specific clinical strategies to improve the durability and effectiveness of restorations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13732,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do in vitro and in situ erosive challenges alter the bonding performance of universal adhesives?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate microtensile bond strengths (μTBS), nanoleakage (NL), and degree of conversion (DC) of two universal adhesives, using etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etch (SE) strategies on eroded dentin submitted to in vitro and in situ erosive challenges.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dentin blocks were prepared from 120 human molars and categorized based on dentin condition (sound, in vitro eroded, and in situ eroded), adhesive system (Scotchbond Universal [SBU] and Zip bond Universal [ZIP]), and adhesive strategy (ER and SE). In the in situ erosive challenge, 20 volunteers wore acrylic resin palatal devices with dentin blocks, immersing them in cola soft drink for 90 s, six times daily for 15 days. The same erosive protocol was used in vitro, followed by rinsing and remineralization. Sound dentin blocks served as controls. Afterward, all dentin blocks were restored with composite resin and sectioned into resin-dentin bonded sticks for μTBS, NL, and DC assessments. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sound dentin exhibited the highest μTBS and DC values and the lowest NL values, while in situ eroded dentin showed the lowest μTBS and DC values and the highest NL values (p = 0.000001). While some differences in the μTBS values were observed between universal adhesives when evaluated on sound dentin (p = 0.0001), no significant differences between adhesives were observed when tested on in vitro and in situ eroded dentin. Regarding NL and DC, no significant differences were found between SBU and ZIP, as well as among adhesive strategies (p &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Erosion in dentin, especially under in situ conditions, presents significant challenges to the adhesion of restorative materials. The choice of an effective adhesive system is crucial, as dentin eroded in situ showed lower adhesion strength and greater nanoleakage. These results highlight the need for specific clinical strategies to improve the durability and effectiveness of restorations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014374962400191X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014374962400191X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估两种通用粘合剂的微拉伸粘接强度(μTBS)、纳米渗漏(NL)和转换度(DC),使用蚀刻-冲洗(ER)或自蚀刻(SE)策略对受到体外和原位侵蚀挑战的侵蚀牙本质进行评估。方法 从 120 颗人类臼齿上制备牙本质块,并根据牙本质状况(完好、体外腐蚀和原位腐蚀)、粘合剂系统(思高邦通用粘合剂 [SBU] 和 Zip bond 通用粘合剂 [ZIP])和粘合剂策略(ER 和 SE)进行分类。在原位侵蚀挑战中,20 名志愿者佩戴带有牙本质块的丙烯酸树脂腭装置,将其浸入可乐软饮料中 90 秒,每天六次,持续 15 天。在体外使用相同的侵蚀方案,然后进行冲洗和再矿化。健全的牙本质块作为对照组。之后,用复合树脂修复所有牙本质块,并将其切成树脂-牙本质粘接棒,以进行μTBS、NL和DC评估。结果健全牙本质的μTBS和DC值最高,NL值最低,而原位腐蚀牙本质的μTBS和DC值最低,NL值最高(p = 0.000001)。虽然在完好牙本质上评估时,通用粘合剂之间的 μTBS 值存在一些差异(p = 0.0001),但在体外和原位腐蚀牙本质上测试时,没有观察到粘合剂之间的显著差异。结论牙本质的腐蚀,尤其是在原位条件下的腐蚀,给修复材料的粘接带来了巨大的挑战。选择有效的粘接系统至关重要,因为原位腐蚀的牙本质显示出较低的粘接强度和较大的纳米渗漏。这些结果突显出需要特定的临床策略来提高修复体的耐久性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do in vitro and in situ erosive challenges alter the bonding performance of universal adhesives?

Objective

To evaluate microtensile bond strengths (μTBS), nanoleakage (NL), and degree of conversion (DC) of two universal adhesives, using etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etch (SE) strategies on eroded dentin submitted to in vitro and in situ erosive challenges.

Methods

Dentin blocks were prepared from 120 human molars and categorized based on dentin condition (sound, in vitro eroded, and in situ eroded), adhesive system (Scotchbond Universal [SBU] and Zip bond Universal [ZIP]), and adhesive strategy (ER and SE). In the in situ erosive challenge, 20 volunteers wore acrylic resin palatal devices with dentin blocks, immersing them in cola soft drink for 90 s, six times daily for 15 days. The same erosive protocol was used in vitro, followed by rinsing and remineralization. Sound dentin blocks served as controls. Afterward, all dentin blocks were restored with composite resin and sectioned into resin-dentin bonded sticks for μTBS, NL, and DC assessments. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

Results

Sound dentin exhibited the highest μTBS and DC values and the lowest NL values, while in situ eroded dentin showed the lowest μTBS and DC values and the highest NL values (p = 0.000001). While some differences in the μTBS values were observed between universal adhesives when evaluated on sound dentin (p = 0.0001), no significant differences between adhesives were observed when tested on in vitro and in situ eroded dentin. Regarding NL and DC, no significant differences were found between SBU and ZIP, as well as among adhesive strategies (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Erosion in dentin, especially under in situ conditions, presents significant challenges to the adhesion of restorative materials. The choice of an effective adhesive system is crucial, as dentin eroded in situ showed lower adhesion strength and greater nanoleakage. These results highlight the need for specific clinical strategies to improve the durability and effectiveness of restorations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
200
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives draws together the many aspects of the science and technology of adhesive materials, from fundamental research and development work to industrial applications. Subject areas covered include: interfacial interactions, surface chemistry, methods of testing, accumulation of test data on physical and mechanical properties, environmental effects, new adhesive materials, sealants, design of bonded joints, and manufacturing technology.
期刊最新文献
The sessile drop work of adhesion revisited Study on viscoelastic properties and rheological properties of SBS modified asphalt for road use with service life The influence of filler types and content on the curing behavior and properties of a bio-based polyurethane engineered sealant Study on the fatigue properties of SPR-bonded aluminum-steel sheet joints Mechanical and failure behaviors of adhesively bonded dissimilar materials joints incorporating bio-inspired morphological irregularities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1