利用网络交叉效率 DEA 和后悔理论对伊朗航空公司进行评估

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101266
S.S. Ganji , Abbas Mardani , Rasul Jahed
{"title":"利用网络交叉效率 DEA 和后悔理论对伊朗航空公司进行评估","authors":"S.S. Ganji ,&nbsp;Abbas Mardani ,&nbsp;Rasul Jahed","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) has been extensively applied to evaluate the air transportation sector. NDEA provides a tool for evaluating the internal processes of Decision-Making Units (DMUs). Optimistic Network Cross-Efficiency (ONCE) has recently been extended to the basic two-stage system. However, there are still two main shortcomings that need to be addressed. First, the ONCE evaluates DMUs based only on the optimistic viewpoint, neglecting the pessimistic viewpoint. The optimistic viewpoint assumes that there is only one set of reference points, which includes the best practice DMUs. The first contribution of this study is to develop a new Pessimistic Network Cross-Efficiency (PNCE) method. This method is based on a new set of reference points, which includes the worst-performing DMUs. The PNCE is developed as an extension of the ONCE. Second, both the ONCE and newly developed PNCE methods may lead to unrealistic results because they neglect the subjective preferences of Decision Makers (DMs). These NDEA models employ the Arithmetic Mean (AM) as the cross-evaluation aggregation method, which not only underestimates the importance of self-evaluation but also overestimates the importance of peer evaluations. Consequently, ONCE and PNCE may lead to biased efficiency results. To address this drawback, the second contribution of this study is to develop a new Aggregation method based on the Regret theory and Consensus (ARC). This method aims to reflect the psychological preferences of DMs when estimating cross-evaluation weights. To achieve this goal, we obtained new optimistic and pessimistic efficiencies by utilizing the newly developed ONCE-ARC and PNCE-ARC methods. Subsequently, a Double-Frontier Network Cross-Efficiency with ARC (DFNCE-ARC) is developed as a more comprehensive NDEA. Finally, a practical application is conducted to assess the performance of a set of Iranian airlines, demonstrating the usefulness and applicability of DFNCE-ARC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 101266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Iranian airlines using network cross-efficiency DEA and the regret theory\",\"authors\":\"S.S. Ganji ,&nbsp;Abbas Mardani ,&nbsp;Rasul Jahed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) has been extensively applied to evaluate the air transportation sector. NDEA provides a tool for evaluating the internal processes of Decision-Making Units (DMUs). Optimistic Network Cross-Efficiency (ONCE) has recently been extended to the basic two-stage system. However, there are still two main shortcomings that need to be addressed. First, the ONCE evaluates DMUs based only on the optimistic viewpoint, neglecting the pessimistic viewpoint. The optimistic viewpoint assumes that there is only one set of reference points, which includes the best practice DMUs. The first contribution of this study is to develop a new Pessimistic Network Cross-Efficiency (PNCE) method. This method is based on a new set of reference points, which includes the worst-performing DMUs. The PNCE is developed as an extension of the ONCE. Second, both the ONCE and newly developed PNCE methods may lead to unrealistic results because they neglect the subjective preferences of Decision Makers (DMs). These NDEA models employ the Arithmetic Mean (AM) as the cross-evaluation aggregation method, which not only underestimates the importance of self-evaluation but also overestimates the importance of peer evaluations. Consequently, ONCE and PNCE may lead to biased efficiency results. To address this drawback, the second contribution of this study is to develop a new Aggregation method based on the Regret theory and Consensus (ARC). This method aims to reflect the psychological preferences of DMs when estimating cross-evaluation weights. To achieve this goal, we obtained new optimistic and pessimistic efficiencies by utilizing the newly developed ONCE-ARC and PNCE-ARC methods. Subsequently, a Double-Frontier Network Cross-Efficiency with ARC (DFNCE-ARC) is developed as a more comprehensive NDEA. Finally, a practical application is conducted to assess the performance of a set of Iranian airlines, demonstrating the usefulness and applicability of DFNCE-ARC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络数据包络分析法(NDEA)已被广泛应用于航空运输业的评估。NDEA 为评估决策单元(DMU)的内部流程提供了一种工具。优化网络交叉效率(ONCE)最近已扩展到基本的两阶段系统。然而,仍有两个主要缺陷需要解决。首先,ONCE 仅从乐观角度评估 DMU,忽略了悲观角度。乐观观点假定只有一组参考点,其中包括最佳实践 DMU。本研究的第一个贡献是开发了一种新的悲观网络交叉效率(PNCE)方法。该方法基于一组新的参考点,其中包括表现最差的 DMU。PNCE 是作为 ONCE 的扩展而开发的。其次,ONCE 和新开发的 PNCE 方法都可能导致不切实际的结果,因为它们忽视了决策者(DMs)的主观偏好。这些 NDEA 模型采用算术平均法(AM)作为交叉评价汇总方法,这不仅低估了自我评价的重要性,也高估了同行评价的重要性。因此,ONCE 和 PNCE 可能会导致效率结果出现偏差。针对这一缺陷,本研究的第二个贡献是开发了一种基于后悔理论和共识(ARC)的新聚合方法。该方法旨在估算交叉评估权重时反映 DM 的心理偏好。为实现这一目标,我们利用新开发的 ONCE-ARC 和 PNCE-ARC 方法获得了新的乐观和悲观效率。随后,作为一种更全面的 NDEA,我们开发了一种带 ARC 的双前沿网络交叉效率(DFNCE-ARC)。最后,对一组伊朗航空公司的性能进行了实际应用评估,证明了 DFNCE-ARC 的有用性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Iranian airlines using network cross-efficiency DEA and the regret theory

Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) has been extensively applied to evaluate the air transportation sector. NDEA provides a tool for evaluating the internal processes of Decision-Making Units (DMUs). Optimistic Network Cross-Efficiency (ONCE) has recently been extended to the basic two-stage system. However, there are still two main shortcomings that need to be addressed. First, the ONCE evaluates DMUs based only on the optimistic viewpoint, neglecting the pessimistic viewpoint. The optimistic viewpoint assumes that there is only one set of reference points, which includes the best practice DMUs. The first contribution of this study is to develop a new Pessimistic Network Cross-Efficiency (PNCE) method. This method is based on a new set of reference points, which includes the worst-performing DMUs. The PNCE is developed as an extension of the ONCE. Second, both the ONCE and newly developed PNCE methods may lead to unrealistic results because they neglect the subjective preferences of Decision Makers (DMs). These NDEA models employ the Arithmetic Mean (AM) as the cross-evaluation aggregation method, which not only underestimates the importance of self-evaluation but also overestimates the importance of peer evaluations. Consequently, ONCE and PNCE may lead to biased efficiency results. To address this drawback, the second contribution of this study is to develop a new Aggregation method based on the Regret theory and Consensus (ARC). This method aims to reflect the psychological preferences of DMs when estimating cross-evaluation weights. To achieve this goal, we obtained new optimistic and pessimistic efficiencies by utilizing the newly developed ONCE-ARC and PNCE-ARC methods. Subsequently, a Double-Frontier Network Cross-Efficiency with ARC (DFNCE-ARC) is developed as a more comprehensive NDEA. Finally, a practical application is conducted to assess the performance of a set of Iranian airlines, demonstrating the usefulness and applicability of DFNCE-ARC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
Capacited range coverage location model for electric vehicle charging stations: A case of Istanbul-Ankara highway Editorial Board Forecasting national port cargo throughput movement using autoregressive models Impacts of electric vehicles and environmental policy stringency on transport CO2 emissions Comparative analysis of perceived quality of bus services in different socioeconomic and cultural urban contexts: Tangier (Morocco) and Oviedo (Spain)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1