开放数据平台:接纳非法创新者的设计原则

IF 8.7 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Strategic Information Systems Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101850
Daniel Rudmark , Rikard Lindgren , Ulrike Schultze
{"title":"开放数据平台:接纳非法创新者的设计原则","authors":"Daniel Rudmark ,&nbsp;Rikard Lindgren ,&nbsp;Ulrike Schultze","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Open data platforms freely provide citizens with access to public data, thus enabling improved governance transparency, enhanced public services, and increased civic engagement. However, unlocking the potential of this digital transformation strategy requires that public institutions manage the tension between public and private interests. Furthermore, even when public institutions break down traditional barriers for citizens’ access to data, the potential users often lack the knowledge to leverage it in meaningful ways. Open data platforms therefore tend to fall short of expectations. Leveraging a 10-year action design research study (ADR) in the Swedish Transport Administration (STA), this paper develops design principles for creating value-generating open data platforms in the public domain. The ADR project was initiated to assist STA in its efforts to deal with outlaw innovators who scraped train data from different websites to develop travel apps. Through three iterative design cycles that eventually led to the formation of a new open data platform, the outlaw innovators increasingly became valued partners in the digital transformation process. Theorizing this development process, this paper offers three design principles that provide guidance to public institutions aspiring to digitally transform by making public data accessible. We also reflect upon how these institutions might mitigate the risks associated with partnering with outlaw innovators in the pursuit of an open data strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"33 3","pages":"Article 101850"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868724000325/pdfft?md5=1de4c2389c27f0feec46449c77e8f38b&pid=1-s2.0-S0963868724000325-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open data platforms: Design principles for embracing outlaw innovators\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Rudmark ,&nbsp;Rikard Lindgren ,&nbsp;Ulrike Schultze\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Open data platforms freely provide citizens with access to public data, thus enabling improved governance transparency, enhanced public services, and increased civic engagement. However, unlocking the potential of this digital transformation strategy requires that public institutions manage the tension between public and private interests. Furthermore, even when public institutions break down traditional barriers for citizens’ access to data, the potential users often lack the knowledge to leverage it in meaningful ways. Open data platforms therefore tend to fall short of expectations. Leveraging a 10-year action design research study (ADR) in the Swedish Transport Administration (STA), this paper develops design principles for creating value-generating open data platforms in the public domain. The ADR project was initiated to assist STA in its efforts to deal with outlaw innovators who scraped train data from different websites to develop travel apps. Through three iterative design cycles that eventually led to the formation of a new open data platform, the outlaw innovators increasingly became valued partners in the digital transformation process. Theorizing this development process, this paper offers three design principles that provide guidance to public institutions aspiring to digitally transform by making public data accessible. We also reflect upon how these institutions might mitigate the risks associated with partnering with outlaw innovators in the pursuit of an open data strategy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strategic Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868724000325/pdfft?md5=1de4c2389c27f0feec46449c77e8f38b&pid=1-s2.0-S0963868724000325-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strategic Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868724000325\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868724000325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开放数据平台免费为公民提供获取公共数据的途径,从而提高治理透明度,加强公共服务,提高公民参与度。然而,要释放这一数字化转型战略的潜力,公共机构必须处理好公共利益与私人利益之间的矛盾。此外,即使公共机构打破了公民获取数据的传统障碍,潜在用户也往往缺乏以有意义的方式利用数据的知识。因此,开放数据平台往往达不到预期目标。本文利用瑞典交通管理局(STA)为期 10 年的行动设计研究(ADR),提出了在公共领域创建可产生价值的开放数据平台的设计原则。ADR 项目的启动是为了帮助瑞典交通管理局应对不法创新者,这些创新者从不同的网站获取火车数据来开发旅行应用程序。通过三个迭代设计周期,最终形成了一个新的开放数据平台,非法创新者逐渐成为数字化转型过程中的重要合作伙伴。通过对这一发展过程进行理论分析,本文提出了三条设计原则,为希望通过开放公共数据实现数字化转型的公共机构提供指导。我们还思考了这些机构在实施开放数据战略的过程中如何降低与非法创新者合作的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open data platforms: Design principles for embracing outlaw innovators

Open data platforms freely provide citizens with access to public data, thus enabling improved governance transparency, enhanced public services, and increased civic engagement. However, unlocking the potential of this digital transformation strategy requires that public institutions manage the tension between public and private interests. Furthermore, even when public institutions break down traditional barriers for citizens’ access to data, the potential users often lack the knowledge to leverage it in meaningful ways. Open data platforms therefore tend to fall short of expectations. Leveraging a 10-year action design research study (ADR) in the Swedish Transport Administration (STA), this paper develops design principles for creating value-generating open data platforms in the public domain. The ADR project was initiated to assist STA in its efforts to deal with outlaw innovators who scraped train data from different websites to develop travel apps. Through three iterative design cycles that eventually led to the formation of a new open data platform, the outlaw innovators increasingly became valued partners in the digital transformation process. Theorizing this development process, this paper offers three design principles that provide guidance to public institutions aspiring to digitally transform by making public data accessible. We also reflect upon how these institutions might mitigate the risks associated with partnering with outlaw innovators in the pursuit of an open data strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Strategic Information Systems
Journal of Strategic Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strategic Information Systems focuses on the strategic management, business and organizational issues associated with the introduction and utilization of information systems, and considers these issues in a global context. The emphasis is on the incorporation of IT into organizations'' strategic thinking, strategy alignment, organizational arrangements and management of change issues.
期刊最新文献
Do CEOs matter? Divergent impact of CEO power on digital and non-digital innovation A knowledge-centric model for government-orchestrated digital transformation among the microbusiness sector A process model for design-oriented machine learning research in information systems Is AI a strategic IS? Reflections and opportunities for research A socio-cognitive perspective of knowledge integration in digital innovation networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1