习惯和对更好的交通选择的次级探索:双系统方法

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100877
Bastian Henriquez-Jara , C. Angelo Guevara , Marcela Munizaga , Omar D. Perez
{"title":"习惯和对更好的交通选择的次级探索:双系统方法","authors":"Bastian Henriquez-Jara ,&nbsp;C. Angelo Guevara ,&nbsp;Marcela Munizaga ,&nbsp;Omar D. Perez","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In psychology, choices are influenced by either goal-directed or habitual systems, which are represented by model-based (MB) and model-free (MF) reinforcement learning algorithms. This paper introduces these concepts into the transportation literature and shows that individuals with habitual tendencies often fail to consider new, potentially superior, alternatives. Across two experiments, participants chose between two bus options, with a third, objectively superior option introduced in a later phase. In both experiments, participants engaging in habitual behavior were less likely to explore the new alternative. Furthermore, we found habitual tendencies were moderated by self-reported stress levels, which is consistent with previous results in the psychological literature. This implies that new transportation modes or routes may remain underused as travelers adhere to habitual patterns, disregarding the introduction of potentially better alternatives, and prompt for public policies that aim to promote goal-directed behavior.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100877"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001406/pdfft?md5=ab6a854b351c679a529567f25f2c2c2b&pid=1-s2.0-S2214367X24001406-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Habits and the subexploration of better transportation options: A dual-system approach\",\"authors\":\"Bastian Henriquez-Jara ,&nbsp;C. Angelo Guevara ,&nbsp;Marcela Munizaga ,&nbsp;Omar D. Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In psychology, choices are influenced by either goal-directed or habitual systems, which are represented by model-based (MB) and model-free (MF) reinforcement learning algorithms. This paper introduces these concepts into the transportation literature and shows that individuals with habitual tendencies often fail to consider new, potentially superior, alternatives. Across two experiments, participants chose between two bus options, with a third, objectively superior option introduced in a later phase. In both experiments, participants engaging in habitual behavior were less likely to explore the new alternative. Furthermore, we found habitual tendencies were moderated by self-reported stress levels, which is consistent with previous results in the psychological literature. This implies that new transportation modes or routes may remain underused as travelers adhere to habitual patterns, disregarding the introduction of potentially better alternatives, and prompt for public policies that aim to promote goal-directed behavior.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100877\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001406/pdfft?md5=ab6a854b351c679a529567f25f2c2c2b&pid=1-s2.0-S2214367X24001406-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001406\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在心理学中,选择会受到目标导向系统或习惯系统的影响,这两种系统分别由基于模型(MB)和无模型(MF)的强化学习算法表示。本文将这些概念引入到交通文献中,并表明具有习惯性倾向的个体往往不会考虑新的、潜在的更优选择。在两个实验中,参与者在两个公交车选项中做出选择,并在稍后阶段引入第三个客观上更优的选项。在这两个实验中,有习惯性行为的参与者不太可能探索新的备选方案。此外,我们还发现习惯性倾向受到自我报告的压力水平的调节,这与之前心理学文献的研究结果一致。这意味着,新的交通方式或路线可能会因为旅行者坚持习惯性模式而未被充分利用,从而忽视了潜在的更好替代方案的引入,这也为旨在促进目标导向型行为的公共政策提供了提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Habits and the subexploration of better transportation options: A dual-system approach

In psychology, choices are influenced by either goal-directed or habitual systems, which are represented by model-based (MB) and model-free (MF) reinforcement learning algorithms. This paper introduces these concepts into the transportation literature and shows that individuals with habitual tendencies often fail to consider new, potentially superior, alternatives. Across two experiments, participants chose between two bus options, with a third, objectively superior option introduced in a later phase. In both experiments, participants engaging in habitual behavior were less likely to explore the new alternative. Furthermore, we found habitual tendencies were moderated by self-reported stress levels, which is consistent with previous results in the psychological literature. This implies that new transportation modes or routes may remain underused as travelers adhere to habitual patterns, disregarding the introduction of potentially better alternatives, and prompt for public policies that aim to promote goal-directed behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the changes in residential location and commute patterns during the pandemic using smart card data Analysing driver behaviour and crash frequency at railway level crossings using connected vehicle and GIS data Sustainable urban mobility transitions through working from home (WFH) An injury severity-based methodology for assessing priority areas for shared micromobility accident risk mitigation Improving conventional transit services with modular autonomous vehicles: A bi-level programming approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1