Cristina Ricco, Caroline J Stone, Victoria P Werth
{"title":"肌炎的临床终点:挑战与前进之路。","authors":"Cristina Ricco, Caroline J Stone, Victoria P Werth","doi":"10.1097/BOR.0000000000001044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review addresses the challenges and advances in clinical endpoints for myositis, with a particular focus on ensuring comprehensive assessment of both muscle and skin disease activity. The relevance of this review stems from recent developments in outcome measures and their implications for clinical trial design and patient inclusivity. While quality of life (QoL) and lung involvement are also important aspects of myositis, they are beyond the scope of this review and need to be addressed in future studies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Traditional outcome measures like the Total Improvement Score (TIS) have limitations, especially for patients with skin-predominant dermatomyositis (DM). Recent studies highlight the importance of incorporating skin-specific measures such as the Cutaneous Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) and the novel composite measure, Dermatomyositis Outcomes for Muscle and Skin (DMOMS). These measures provide a more balanced assessment of disease activity. Clinical trial data analyzed using these measures have demonstrated significant benefits for patients with both classic and amyopathic DM, emphasizing the need for their broader adoption.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Advancements in outcome measures are crucial for inclusive and effective myositis clinical trials. Incorporating comprehensive tools like the DMOMS can enhance the assessment of both muscle and skin disease activities, potentially leading to better therapeutic strategies and improved patient outcomes. This shift is essential for addressing the needs of all Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients, including those with skin-predominant DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":11145,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"430-437"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical endpoints in myositis: challenges and ways forward.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Ricco, Caroline J Stone, Victoria P Werth\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOR.0000000000001044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review addresses the challenges and advances in clinical endpoints for myositis, with a particular focus on ensuring comprehensive assessment of both muscle and skin disease activity. The relevance of this review stems from recent developments in outcome measures and their implications for clinical trial design and patient inclusivity. While quality of life (QoL) and lung involvement are also important aspects of myositis, they are beyond the scope of this review and need to be addressed in future studies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Traditional outcome measures like the Total Improvement Score (TIS) have limitations, especially for patients with skin-predominant dermatomyositis (DM). Recent studies highlight the importance of incorporating skin-specific measures such as the Cutaneous Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) and the novel composite measure, Dermatomyositis Outcomes for Muscle and Skin (DMOMS). These measures provide a more balanced assessment of disease activity. Clinical trial data analyzed using these measures have demonstrated significant benefits for patients with both classic and amyopathic DM, emphasizing the need for their broader adoption.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Advancements in outcome measures are crucial for inclusive and effective myositis clinical trials. Incorporating comprehensive tools like the DMOMS can enhance the assessment of both muscle and skin disease activities, potentially leading to better therapeutic strategies and improved patient outcomes. This shift is essential for addressing the needs of all Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients, including those with skin-predominant DM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"430-437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000001044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000001044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical endpoints in myositis: challenges and ways forward.
Purpose of review: This review addresses the challenges and advances in clinical endpoints for myositis, with a particular focus on ensuring comprehensive assessment of both muscle and skin disease activity. The relevance of this review stems from recent developments in outcome measures and their implications for clinical trial design and patient inclusivity. While quality of life (QoL) and lung involvement are also important aspects of myositis, they are beyond the scope of this review and need to be addressed in future studies.
Recent findings: Traditional outcome measures like the Total Improvement Score (TIS) have limitations, especially for patients with skin-predominant dermatomyositis (DM). Recent studies highlight the importance of incorporating skin-specific measures such as the Cutaneous Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) and the novel composite measure, Dermatomyositis Outcomes for Muscle and Skin (DMOMS). These measures provide a more balanced assessment of disease activity. Clinical trial data analyzed using these measures have demonstrated significant benefits for patients with both classic and amyopathic DM, emphasizing the need for their broader adoption.
Summary: Advancements in outcome measures are crucial for inclusive and effective myositis clinical trials. Incorporating comprehensive tools like the DMOMS can enhance the assessment of both muscle and skin disease activities, potentially leading to better therapeutic strategies and improved patient outcomes. This shift is essential for addressing the needs of all Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients, including those with skin-predominant DM.
期刊介绍:
A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Rheumatology offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of rheumatology. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include vasculitis syndromes, medical physiology and rheumatic diseases, crystal deposition diseases and rheumatoid arthritis. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.