新型机器人轮椅转移系统的认知与评估。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2024.2391599
Shantanu A Satpute, Rosemarie Cooper, Jorge Candiotti, Jonathan A Duvall, Benjamin Gebrosky, Garrett Grindle, Nikitha Deepak, Sivashankar Sivakanthan, Alicia Koontz, Rory A Cooper
{"title":"新型机器人轮椅转移系统的认知与评估。","authors":"Shantanu A Satpute, Rosemarie Cooper, Jorge Candiotti, Jonathan A Duvall, Benjamin Gebrosky, Garrett Grindle, Nikitha Deepak, Sivashankar Sivakanthan, Alicia Koontz, Rory A Cooper","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2391599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Wheelchair transfers risk injury to users and caregivers. Conventional transfer devices are injury-prone and time inefficient. The Powered Personal Transfer System (PPTS), utilizing a modified Electric Powered Wheelchair (EPW) and a hospital bed, provides a no-lift solution for bed-to-wheelchair transfers. Objective 1: Assess PPTS workload compared to existing methods. Objective 2: Evaluate PPTS EPW in daily mobility tasks. Objective 3: Perform Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA) wheelchair standards testing for PPTS EPW stability and performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen professional and family caregivers, experienced in assisting EPW users, performed transfers between the bed and EPW using the PPTS. Subsequently, participants drove the PPTS EPW providing ratings on the ease of performing mobility tasks. Wheelchair testing was conducted following RESNA standards.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>: Simulated bedroom in a laboratory setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported low workload demands for employing the PPTS and indicated a preference for the PPTS over existing transfer devices/methods. Ease of performing everyday mobility tasks was not significantly different between the modified PPTS and the commercially available original manufacturer equipment EPW (<i>p</i> > 0.05). RESNA wheelchair standards testing confirmed that the PPTS EPW preserves functionality, stability and performance when compared to similar commercially available EPWs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PPTS demonstrated promise in offering a practical, low demanding, and safe solution for transfers. It has the potential to enhance user and caregiver safety by reducing the incidence of caregiver injuries associated with assisting in transfer tasks. In addition to its efficiency and ease of use, it is an advancement in assistive technology for wheelchair transfers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions and assessment of a novel robotic wheelchair transfer system.\",\"authors\":\"Shantanu A Satpute, Rosemarie Cooper, Jorge Candiotti, Jonathan A Duvall, Benjamin Gebrosky, Garrett Grindle, Nikitha Deepak, Sivashankar Sivakanthan, Alicia Koontz, Rory A Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2391599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Wheelchair transfers risk injury to users and caregivers. Conventional transfer devices are injury-prone and time inefficient. The Powered Personal Transfer System (PPTS), utilizing a modified Electric Powered Wheelchair (EPW) and a hospital bed, provides a no-lift solution for bed-to-wheelchair transfers. Objective 1: Assess PPTS workload compared to existing methods. Objective 2: Evaluate PPTS EPW in daily mobility tasks. Objective 3: Perform Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA) wheelchair standards testing for PPTS EPW stability and performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen professional and family caregivers, experienced in assisting EPW users, performed transfers between the bed and EPW using the PPTS. Subsequently, participants drove the PPTS EPW providing ratings on the ease of performing mobility tasks. Wheelchair testing was conducted following RESNA standards.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>: Simulated bedroom in a laboratory setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported low workload demands for employing the PPTS and indicated a preference for the PPTS over existing transfer devices/methods. Ease of performing everyday mobility tasks was not significantly different between the modified PPTS and the commercially available original manufacturer equipment EPW (<i>p</i> > 0.05). RESNA wheelchair standards testing confirmed that the PPTS EPW preserves functionality, stability and performance when compared to similar commercially available EPWs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PPTS demonstrated promise in offering a practical, low demanding, and safe solution for transfers. It has the potential to enhance user and caregiver safety by reducing the incidence of caregiver injuries associated with assisting in transfer tasks. In addition to its efficiency and ease of use, it is an advancement in assistive technology for wheelchair transfers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2391599\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2391599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:轮椅转移有可能对使用者和护理人员造成伤害。传统的转移设备容易造成伤害,而且时间效率低。电动个人转运系统(PPTS)利用改进型电动轮椅(EPW)和医院病床,为床到轮椅的转运提供了一种无需移位的解决方案。目标 1:与现有方法相比,评估 PPTS 的工作量。目标 2: 评估 PPTS EPW 在日常移动任务中的作用。目标 3:对 PPTS EPW 的稳定性和性能进行北美康复工程与辅助技术协会(RESNA)轮椅标准测试:方法:15 名在协助 EPW 使用者方面经验丰富的专业和家庭护理人员使用 PPTS 在床和 EPW 之间进行转移。随后,参与者驾驶 PPTS EPW,对执行移动任务的难易程度进行评分。轮椅测试按照RESNA标准进行:实验室环境中的模拟卧室:结果:参与者表示使用PPTS的工作量要求较低,并表示与现有的转运装置/方法相比,他们更喜欢PPTS。改良型PPTS与市售原厂设备EPW在完成日常移动任务的难易程度上没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。RESNA轮椅标准测试证实,PPTS EPW与类似的市售EPW相比,在功能性、稳定性和性能方面都有所保留:PPTS 是一种实用、低要求和安全的转运解决方案。它可以减少护理人员在协助转运任务时受伤的几率,从而提高使用者和护理人员的安全。除了高效、易用之外,它还是轮椅转移辅助技术的一个进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions and assessment of a novel robotic wheelchair transfer system.

Objectives: Wheelchair transfers risk injury to users and caregivers. Conventional transfer devices are injury-prone and time inefficient. The Powered Personal Transfer System (PPTS), utilizing a modified Electric Powered Wheelchair (EPW) and a hospital bed, provides a no-lift solution for bed-to-wheelchair transfers. Objective 1: Assess PPTS workload compared to existing methods. Objective 2: Evaluate PPTS EPW in daily mobility tasks. Objective 3: Perform Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA) wheelchair standards testing for PPTS EPW stability and performance.

Methods: Fifteen professional and family caregivers, experienced in assisting EPW users, performed transfers between the bed and EPW using the PPTS. Subsequently, participants drove the PPTS EPW providing ratings on the ease of performing mobility tasks. Wheelchair testing was conducted following RESNA standards.

Setting: : Simulated bedroom in a laboratory setting.

Results: Participants reported low workload demands for employing the PPTS and indicated a preference for the PPTS over existing transfer devices/methods. Ease of performing everyday mobility tasks was not significantly different between the modified PPTS and the commercially available original manufacturer equipment EPW (p > 0.05). RESNA wheelchair standards testing confirmed that the PPTS EPW preserves functionality, stability and performance when compared to similar commercially available EPWs.

Conclusion: The PPTS demonstrated promise in offering a practical, low demanding, and safe solution for transfers. It has the potential to enhance user and caregiver safety by reducing the incidence of caregiver injuries associated with assisting in transfer tasks. In addition to its efficiency and ease of use, it is an advancement in assistive technology for wheelchair transfers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Embracing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (IDEA): Cultivating understanding internally to foster external change. First report of a new exoskeleton in incomplete spinal cord injury: FreeGait®. Improving current understanding of cognitive impairment in patients with a spinal cord injury: A UK-based clinician survey. Shelter-in-place during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on secondary health conditions, anxiety, loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, and positive affect and well-being. The association between locus of control and general mental health in patients with lumbar spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1