Carolyn W. Zhu PhD, Justin Choi MEd, William Hung MD, Mary Sano PhD
{"title":"痴呆症患者潜在用药不当的种族和民族差异。","authors":"Carolyn W. Zhu PhD, Justin Choi MEd, William Hung MD, Mary Sano PhD","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Racial and ethnic disparities in potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among older adults with dementia are unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were drawn from the baseline visits of participants who were ≥60 years old and diagnosed with dementia in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACCUDS) recruited from National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADCs) throughout the United States. PIM utilization was evaluated using the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria for PIM Use in Older Adults. We estimated the association between race and ethnicity and the following outcomes and estimation models: (1) any PIM use, any PIM in each drug class, and any PIM best avoided in dementia patients using logistic regression models, (2) total number of medications, total number of PIMs, and anticholinergic burden scale (ACBS) using Poisson or negative binomial regression models, and (3) proportion of total medications that were PIMs using generalized linear models (GLM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to White participants, Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants reported taking fewer total medications (incidence rate ratio [IRR] ± standard error[SE] = 0.903 ± 0.017, 0.875 ± 0.021, and 0.912 ± 0.041, respectively, all <i>p</i> < 0.01). Asian participants were less likely to be exposed to any PIM (odds ratio [OR] ± SE = 0.619 ± 0.118, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Compared to White participants, Black participants were less likely to be exposed to benzodiazepine (OR ± SE = 0.609 ± 0.094, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and antidepressant (OR ± SE = 0.416 ± 0.103, <i>p <</i> 0.001) PIMs, but greater antipsychotic (OR ± SE = 1.496 ± 0.204, <i>p</i> < 0.01), cardiovascular (OR ± SE = 2.193 ± 0.255, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and skeletal muscle relaxant (OR ± SE = 2.977 ± 0.860, <i>p <</i> 0.001) PIMs. Hispanic participants were exposed to greater skeletal muscle relaxant PIMs and had lower anticholinergic burden. Asian participants were exposed to fewer benzodiazepine PIMs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Significant racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to PIMs and PIMs by medication category in dementia research participants who have access to dementia experts found in the study suggest that disparities may be wider in the larger community.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 11","pages":"3360-3373"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and ethnic disparities in potentially inappropriate medication use in patients with dementia\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn W. Zhu PhD, Justin Choi MEd, William Hung MD, Mary Sano PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Racial and ethnic disparities in potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among older adults with dementia are unclear.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data were drawn from the baseline visits of participants who were ≥60 years old and diagnosed with dementia in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACCUDS) recruited from National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADCs) throughout the United States. PIM utilization was evaluated using the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria for PIM Use in Older Adults. We estimated the association between race and ethnicity and the following outcomes and estimation models: (1) any PIM use, any PIM in each drug class, and any PIM best avoided in dementia patients using logistic regression models, (2) total number of medications, total number of PIMs, and anticholinergic burden scale (ACBS) using Poisson or negative binomial regression models, and (3) proportion of total medications that were PIMs using generalized linear models (GLM).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Compared to White participants, Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants reported taking fewer total medications (incidence rate ratio [IRR] ± standard error[SE] = 0.903 ± 0.017, 0.875 ± 0.021, and 0.912 ± 0.041, respectively, all <i>p</i> < 0.01). Asian participants were less likely to be exposed to any PIM (odds ratio [OR] ± SE = 0.619 ± 0.118, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Compared to White participants, Black participants were less likely to be exposed to benzodiazepine (OR ± SE = 0.609 ± 0.094, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and antidepressant (OR ± SE = 0.416 ± 0.103, <i>p <</i> 0.001) PIMs, but greater antipsychotic (OR ± SE = 1.496 ± 0.204, <i>p</i> < 0.01), cardiovascular (OR ± SE = 2.193 ± 0.255, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and skeletal muscle relaxant (OR ± SE = 2.977 ± 0.860, <i>p <</i> 0.001) PIMs. Hispanic participants were exposed to greater skeletal muscle relaxant PIMs and had lower anticholinergic burden. Asian participants were exposed to fewer benzodiazepine PIMs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Significant racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to PIMs and PIMs by medication category in dementia research participants who have access to dementia experts found in the study suggest that disparities may be wider in the larger community.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"72 11\",\"pages\":\"3360-3373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19152\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Racial and ethnic disparities in potentially inappropriate medication use in patients with dementia
Introduction
Racial and ethnic disparities in potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among older adults with dementia are unclear.
Methods
Data were drawn from the baseline visits of participants who were ≥60 years old and diagnosed with dementia in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACCUDS) recruited from National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADCs) throughout the United States. PIM utilization was evaluated using the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria for PIM Use in Older Adults. We estimated the association between race and ethnicity and the following outcomes and estimation models: (1) any PIM use, any PIM in each drug class, and any PIM best avoided in dementia patients using logistic regression models, (2) total number of medications, total number of PIMs, and anticholinergic burden scale (ACBS) using Poisson or negative binomial regression models, and (3) proportion of total medications that were PIMs using generalized linear models (GLM).
Results
Compared to White participants, Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants reported taking fewer total medications (incidence rate ratio [IRR] ± standard error[SE] = 0.903 ± 0.017, 0.875 ± 0.021, and 0.912 ± 0.041, respectively, all p < 0.01). Asian participants were less likely to be exposed to any PIM (odds ratio [OR] ± SE = 0.619 ± 0.118, p < 0.05). Compared to White participants, Black participants were less likely to be exposed to benzodiazepine (OR ± SE = 0.609 ± 0.094, p < 0.01) and antidepressant (OR ± SE = 0.416 ± 0.103, p < 0.001) PIMs, but greater antipsychotic (OR ± SE = 1.496 ± 0.204, p < 0.01), cardiovascular (OR ± SE = 2.193 ± 0.255, p < 0.001), and skeletal muscle relaxant (OR ± SE = 2.977 ± 0.860, p < 0.001) PIMs. Hispanic participants were exposed to greater skeletal muscle relaxant PIMs and had lower anticholinergic burden. Asian participants were exposed to fewer benzodiazepine PIMs.
Discussion
Significant racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to PIMs and PIMs by medication category in dementia research participants who have access to dementia experts found in the study suggest that disparities may be wider in the larger community.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.