痴呆症患者潜在用药不当的种族和民族差异。

Carolyn W Zhu, Justin Choi, William Hung, Mary Sano
{"title":"痴呆症患者潜在用药不当的种族和民族差异。","authors":"Carolyn W Zhu, Justin Choi, William Hung, Mary Sano","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Racial and ethnic disparities in potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among older adults with dementia are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the baseline visits of participants who were ≥60 years old and diagnosed with dementia in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACCUDS) recruited from National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADCs) throughout the United States. PIM utilization was evaluated using the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria for PIM Use in Older Adults. We estimated the association between race and ethnicity and the following outcomes and estimation models: (1) any PIM use, any PIM in each drug class, and any PIM best avoided in dementia patients using logistic regression models, (2) total number of medications, total number of PIMs, and anticholinergic burden scale (ACBS) using Poisson or negative binomial regression models, and (3) proportion of total medications that were PIMs using generalized linear models (GLM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to White participants, Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants reported taking fewer total medications (incidence rate ratio [IRR] ± standard error[SE] = 0.903 ± 0.017, 0.875 ± 0.021, and 0.912 ± 0.041, respectively, all p < 0.01). Asian participants were less likely to be exposed to any PIM (odds ratio [OR] ± SE = 0.619 ± 0.118, p < 0.05). Compared to White participants, Black participants were less likely to be exposed to benzodiazepine (OR ± SE = 0.609 ± 0.094, p < 0.01) and antidepressant (OR ± SE = 0.416 ± 0.103, p < 0.001) PIMs, but greater antipsychotic (OR ± SE = 1.496 ± 0.204, p < 0.01), cardiovascular (OR ± SE = 2.193 ± 0.255, p < 0.001), and skeletal muscle relaxant (OR ± SE = 2.977 ± 0.860, p < 0.001) PIMs. Hispanic participants were exposed to greater skeletal muscle relaxant PIMs and had lower anticholinergic burden. Asian participants were exposed to fewer benzodiazepine PIMs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Significant racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to PIMs and PIMs by medication category in dementia research participants who have access to dementia experts found in the study suggest that disparities may be wider in the larger community.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and ethnic disparities in potentially inappropriate medication use in patients with dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn W Zhu, Justin Choi, William Hung, Mary Sano\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Racial and ethnic disparities in potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among older adults with dementia are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the baseline visits of participants who were ≥60 years old and diagnosed with dementia in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACCUDS) recruited from National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADCs) throughout the United States. PIM utilization was evaluated using the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria for PIM Use in Older Adults. We estimated the association between race and ethnicity and the following outcomes and estimation models: (1) any PIM use, any PIM in each drug class, and any PIM best avoided in dementia patients using logistic regression models, (2) total number of medications, total number of PIMs, and anticholinergic burden scale (ACBS) using Poisson or negative binomial regression models, and (3) proportion of total medications that were PIMs using generalized linear models (GLM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to White participants, Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants reported taking fewer total medications (incidence rate ratio [IRR] ± standard error[SE] = 0.903 ± 0.017, 0.875 ± 0.021, and 0.912 ± 0.041, respectively, all p < 0.01). Asian participants were less likely to be exposed to any PIM (odds ratio [OR] ± SE = 0.619 ± 0.118, p < 0.05). Compared to White participants, Black participants were less likely to be exposed to benzodiazepine (OR ± SE = 0.609 ± 0.094, p < 0.01) and antidepressant (OR ± SE = 0.416 ± 0.103, p < 0.001) PIMs, but greater antipsychotic (OR ± SE = 1.496 ± 0.204, p < 0.01), cardiovascular (OR ± SE = 2.193 ± 0.255, p < 0.001), and skeletal muscle relaxant (OR ± SE = 2.977 ± 0.860, p < 0.001) PIMs. Hispanic participants were exposed to greater skeletal muscle relaxant PIMs and had lower anticholinergic burden. Asian participants were exposed to fewer benzodiazepine PIMs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Significant racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to PIMs and PIMs by medication category in dementia research participants who have access to dementia experts found in the study suggest that disparities may be wider in the larger community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:患有痴呆症的老年人在潜在用药不当(PIM)方面的种族和民族差异尚不清楚:患有痴呆症的老年人在潜在不当用药(PIM)方面的种族和民族差异尚不清楚:数据来自全美由国家老龄化研究所(NIA)资助的阿尔茨海默病研究中心(ADCs)招募的、年龄≥60岁且在国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心统一数据集(NACCUDS)中被诊断为痴呆症的参与者的基线访问。PIM使用情况采用2019年美国老年医学会《老年人PIM使用情况比尔斯标准》进行评估。我们估算了种族和民族与以下结果和估算模型之间的关系:(1)使用任何 PIM、每类药物中的任何 PIM 以及痴呆患者最好避免使用的任何 PIM(使用逻辑回归模型);(2)药物总数、PIM 总数以及抗胆碱能药物负担量表(ACBS)(使用泊松或负二项回归模型);(3)PIM 占药物总数的比例(使用广义线性模型 (GLM)):结果:与白人参与者相比,黑人、西班牙裔和亚裔参与者报告服用的药物总数较少(发病率比[IRR] ± 标准误差[SE] 分别为 0.903 ± 0.017、0.875 ± 0.021 和 0.912 ± 0.041,均为 p 讨论:本研究发现,在可接触痴呆症专家的痴呆症研究参与者中,按药物类别划分的PIMs和PIMs接触率存在显著的种族和民族差异,这表明在更大的社区中,差异可能更为广泛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Racial and ethnic disparities in potentially inappropriate medication use in patients with dementia.

Introduction: Racial and ethnic disparities in potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among older adults with dementia are unclear.

Methods: Data were drawn from the baseline visits of participants who were ≥60 years old and diagnosed with dementia in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACCUDS) recruited from National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADCs) throughout the United States. PIM utilization was evaluated using the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria for PIM Use in Older Adults. We estimated the association between race and ethnicity and the following outcomes and estimation models: (1) any PIM use, any PIM in each drug class, and any PIM best avoided in dementia patients using logistic regression models, (2) total number of medications, total number of PIMs, and anticholinergic burden scale (ACBS) using Poisson or negative binomial regression models, and (3) proportion of total medications that were PIMs using generalized linear models (GLM).

Results: Compared to White participants, Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants reported taking fewer total medications (incidence rate ratio [IRR] ± standard error[SE] = 0.903 ± 0.017, 0.875 ± 0.021, and 0.912 ± 0.041, respectively, all p < 0.01). Asian participants were less likely to be exposed to any PIM (odds ratio [OR] ± SE = 0.619 ± 0.118, p < 0.05). Compared to White participants, Black participants were less likely to be exposed to benzodiazepine (OR ± SE = 0.609 ± 0.094, p < 0.01) and antidepressant (OR ± SE = 0.416 ± 0.103, p < 0.001) PIMs, but greater antipsychotic (OR ± SE = 1.496 ± 0.204, p < 0.01), cardiovascular (OR ± SE = 2.193 ± 0.255, p < 0.001), and skeletal muscle relaxant (OR ± SE = 2.977 ± 0.860, p < 0.001) PIMs. Hispanic participants were exposed to greater skeletal muscle relaxant PIMs and had lower anticholinergic burden. Asian participants were exposed to fewer benzodiazepine PIMs.

Discussion: Significant racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to PIMs and PIMs by medication category in dementia research participants who have access to dementia experts found in the study suggest that disparities may be wider in the larger community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Caring for dementia caregivers: How well does social risk screening reflect unmet needs? End-of-life emergency department use and healthcare expenditures among older adults: A nationally representative study. Antipsychotics for nursing home residents with dementia: Chemical restraints or essential therapeutic intervention? Identifying and quantifying potentially problematic prescribing cascades in clinical practice: A mixed-methods study. Clinical momentum in the care of older adults with advanced dementia: What evidence is there in the medical record?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1