校准对 Vitros XT 7600 分析仪 TSH 质量控制和患者结果偏差的影响。

Biochemia medica Pub Date : 2024-10-15 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.11613/BM.2024.030703
Jill Boreyko, Josko Ivica
{"title":"校准对 Vitros XT 7600 分析仪 TSH 质量控制和患者结果偏差的影响。","authors":"Jill Boreyko, Josko Ivica","doi":"10.11613/BM.2024.030703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is a glycoprotein secreted by the anterior pituitary gland and is regulated by negative feedback from the serum free thyroid hormones. In this study we aimed to quantitate the relative bias caused by calibration drifting as seen in our TSH Levey-Jennings quality control (QC) charts and assess the magnitude of bias on patients' samples.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the period from October 2021 to August 2022 we looked at the QC results of ten 28-days' calibration time intervals and calculated relative bias compared to the mean. For each time interval the mean from three QC points before and after calibration was calculated. The average from 10 pre- and post-calibration means was calculated and the relative bias, pre- and post-calibration, was then calculated. We used 5 patient samples with low, normal and high TSH concentrations and calculated relative bias pre- and post-calibration. The allowed relative bias for TSH is ± 6.7%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At both QC levels, with the respective means of 5.14 mIU/L (coefficient of variation, CV% = 3.1%) and 27.80 mIU/L (CV% = 3.2%) had their respective relative bias - 8.2% and - 7.9%. The patient samples with low (0.586 mIU/L), normal (2.89 mIU/L and 5.19 mIU/L) and high (20.5 mIU/L and 39.8 mIU/L) TSH had - 4.1%, - 4.0%, - 3.5%, - 5.1% and - 4.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the relative bias exceeded allowable criteria for the QC samples, this was not manifested on the patients' samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of calibration on bias in quality control and patient results for TSH on Vitros XT 7600 analyzer.\",\"authors\":\"Jill Boreyko, Josko Ivica\",\"doi\":\"10.11613/BM.2024.030703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is a glycoprotein secreted by the anterior pituitary gland and is regulated by negative feedback from the serum free thyroid hormones. In this study we aimed to quantitate the relative bias caused by calibration drifting as seen in our TSH Levey-Jennings quality control (QC) charts and assess the magnitude of bias on patients' samples.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the period from October 2021 to August 2022 we looked at the QC results of ten 28-days' calibration time intervals and calculated relative bias compared to the mean. For each time interval the mean from three QC points before and after calibration was calculated. The average from 10 pre- and post-calibration means was calculated and the relative bias, pre- and post-calibration, was then calculated. We used 5 patient samples with low, normal and high TSH concentrations and calculated relative bias pre- and post-calibration. The allowed relative bias for TSH is ± 6.7%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At both QC levels, with the respective means of 5.14 mIU/L (coefficient of variation, CV% = 3.1%) and 27.80 mIU/L (CV% = 3.2%) had their respective relative bias - 8.2% and - 7.9%. The patient samples with low (0.586 mIU/L), normal (2.89 mIU/L and 5.19 mIU/L) and high (20.5 mIU/L and 39.8 mIU/L) TSH had - 4.1%, - 4.0%, - 3.5%, - 5.1% and - 4.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the relative bias exceeded allowable criteria for the QC samples, this was not manifested on the patients' samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemia medica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334199/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemia medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2024.030703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2024.030703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介促甲状腺激素(TSH)是垂体前叶分泌的一种糖蛋白,受血清游离甲状腺激素的负反馈调节。在这项研究中,我们旨在量化 TSH Levey-Jennings 质量控制(QC)图表中校准漂移造成的相对偏差,并评估患者样本的偏差程度:在 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 8 月期间,我们查看了 10 个 28 天校准时间间隔的质控结果,并计算了与平均值相比的相对偏差。对于每个时间间隔,计算校准前后三个质控点的平均值。计算校准前后 10 个平均值,然后计算校准前后的相对偏差。我们使用了 TSH 浓度较低、正常和较高的 5 份患者样本,并计算了校准前后的相对偏差。TSH 允许的相对偏差为 ± 6.7%:在两个质控水平上,平均值分别为 5.14 mIU/L(变异系数,CV% = 3.1%)和 27.80 mIU/L(CV% = 3.2%)的相对偏差分别为 - 8.2% 和 - 7.9%。低 TSH(0.586 mIU/L)、正常 TSH(2.89 mIU/L 和 5.19 mIU/L)和高 TSH(20.5 mIU/L 和 39.8 mIU/L)患者样本的相对偏差分别为-4.1%、-4.0%、-3.5%、-5.1%和-4.1%:尽管质控样本的相对偏差超过了允许的标准,但这在患者样本中并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of calibration on bias in quality control and patient results for TSH on Vitros XT 7600 analyzer.

Introduction: Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is a glycoprotein secreted by the anterior pituitary gland and is regulated by negative feedback from the serum free thyroid hormones. In this study we aimed to quantitate the relative bias caused by calibration drifting as seen in our TSH Levey-Jennings quality control (QC) charts and assess the magnitude of bias on patients' samples.

Materials and methods: In the period from October 2021 to August 2022 we looked at the QC results of ten 28-days' calibration time intervals and calculated relative bias compared to the mean. For each time interval the mean from three QC points before and after calibration was calculated. The average from 10 pre- and post-calibration means was calculated and the relative bias, pre- and post-calibration, was then calculated. We used 5 patient samples with low, normal and high TSH concentrations and calculated relative bias pre- and post-calibration. The allowed relative bias for TSH is ± 6.7%.

Results: At both QC levels, with the respective means of 5.14 mIU/L (coefficient of variation, CV% = 3.1%) and 27.80 mIU/L (CV% = 3.2%) had their respective relative bias - 8.2% and - 7.9%. The patient samples with low (0.586 mIU/L), normal (2.89 mIU/L and 5.19 mIU/L) and high (20.5 mIU/L and 39.8 mIU/L) TSH had - 4.1%, - 4.0%, - 3.5%, - 5.1% and - 4.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: Even though the relative bias exceeded allowable criteria for the QC samples, this was not manifested on the patients' samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of the color change in blue-green inclusions within neutrophils between two patients with different clinical outcomes. D-dimer assay interference detected by the discrepancy in D-dimer concentrations at different dilutions: a case report. Introducing prediction intervals for sample means. Laboratory medicine and sports: where are we now? Serum concentration of ferroportin in women of reproductive age.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1