新自由主义、殖民主义和拉丁美洲公民参与环境评估进程的系统性障碍:波多黎各案例

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107635
Gustavo García-López , William McCormick-Rivera
{"title":"新自由主义、殖民主义和拉丁美洲公民参与环境评估进程的系统性障碍:波多黎各案例","authors":"Gustavo García-López ,&nbsp;William McCormick-Rivera","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The need for greater citizen participation in EIA is well established, as are the numerous barriers to such participation. Yet there are still important gaps in understanding what political-economic power relations undermine participation. In particular, there are few studies linking (neo)colonialism, neoliberalism and austerity to EIA governance and citizen participation. Moreover, there are comparatively fewer studies of EIA from Latin America, and even less from the Caribbean. In this paper, we contribute to filling these two gaps by studying the connections between structural forms of power of colonial-neoliberal governance, and the experiences of EIA participation in the Caribbean island-nation of Puerto Rico. Despite having been a pioneer in EIA implementation, there are no English-language studies focused on Puerto Rico's EIA process. We find strong limitations to citizen participation in EIA, including lack of access to information, pro-forma participation for previously-made decisions, favoring of private economic interests over sustainability and justice, and a legal framework restricting participation and environmental protection. We argue that these limitations are produced through the colonial neoliberal transformations of environmental governance in Puerto Rico, in particular: policies of extreme deregulation and austerity, a permanent state of emergency and exception, and a highly corrupt corporatocracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 107635"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002221/pdfft?md5=7dcc21c570611486b4cc532f25c7342c&pid=1-s2.0-S0195925524002221-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoliberalism, colonialism, and systemic barriers to citizen participation in environmental assessment processes in Latin America: The case of Puerto Rico\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo García-López ,&nbsp;William McCormick-Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The need for greater citizen participation in EIA is well established, as are the numerous barriers to such participation. Yet there are still important gaps in understanding what political-economic power relations undermine participation. In particular, there are few studies linking (neo)colonialism, neoliberalism and austerity to EIA governance and citizen participation. Moreover, there are comparatively fewer studies of EIA from Latin America, and even less from the Caribbean. In this paper, we contribute to filling these two gaps by studying the connections between structural forms of power of colonial-neoliberal governance, and the experiences of EIA participation in the Caribbean island-nation of Puerto Rico. Despite having been a pioneer in EIA implementation, there are no English-language studies focused on Puerto Rico's EIA process. We find strong limitations to citizen participation in EIA, including lack of access to information, pro-forma participation for previously-made decisions, favoring of private economic interests over sustainability and justice, and a legal framework restricting participation and environmental protection. We argue that these limitations are produced through the colonial neoliberal transformations of environmental governance in Puerto Rico, in particular: policies of extreme deregulation and austerity, a permanent state of emergency and exception, and a highly corrupt corporatocracy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002221/pdfft?md5=7dcc21c570611486b4cc532f25c7342c&pid=1-s2.0-S0195925524002221-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002221\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002221","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公民更多地参与环境影响评估的必要性已得到公认,而这种参与所面临的众多障碍也已得到证实。然而,在了解哪些政治经济权力关系会削弱参与方面仍存在重大差距。特别是,很少有研究将(新)殖民主义、新自由主义和紧缩政策与环境影响评估治理和公民参与联系起来。此外,拉丁美洲的环境影响评估研究相对较少,加勒比地区的研究就更少了。在本文中,我们通过研究殖民主义-新自由主义治理的权力结构形式与加勒比岛国波多黎各的环境影响评估参与经验之间的联系,为填补这两个空白做出了贡献。尽管波多黎各是实施环境影响评估的先驱,但却没有以波多黎各环境影响评估过程为重点的英语研究。我们发现,公民参与环境影响评估有很大的局限性,包括缺乏获取信息的渠道、按部就班地参与先前做出的决策、偏重私人经济利益而忽视可持续性和公正性,以及限制参与和环境保护的法律框架。我们认为,这些限制是波多黎各环境治理的殖民新自由主义转型造成的,特别是:极端放松管制和紧缩政策、长期的紧急状态和例外情况以及高度腐败的公司统治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neoliberalism, colonialism, and systemic barriers to citizen participation in environmental assessment processes in Latin America: The case of Puerto Rico

The need for greater citizen participation in EIA is well established, as are the numerous barriers to such participation. Yet there are still important gaps in understanding what political-economic power relations undermine participation. In particular, there are few studies linking (neo)colonialism, neoliberalism and austerity to EIA governance and citizen participation. Moreover, there are comparatively fewer studies of EIA from Latin America, and even less from the Caribbean. In this paper, we contribute to filling these two gaps by studying the connections between structural forms of power of colonial-neoliberal governance, and the experiences of EIA participation in the Caribbean island-nation of Puerto Rico. Despite having been a pioneer in EIA implementation, there are no English-language studies focused on Puerto Rico's EIA process. We find strong limitations to citizen participation in EIA, including lack of access to information, pro-forma participation for previously-made decisions, favoring of private economic interests over sustainability and justice, and a legal framework restricting participation and environmental protection. We argue that these limitations are produced through the colonial neoliberal transformations of environmental governance in Puerto Rico, in particular: policies of extreme deregulation and austerity, a permanent state of emergency and exception, and a highly corrupt corporatocracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1