影响土工格室加固土上条形基脚全仪器模型试验性能的参数

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geotextiles and Geomembranes Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.08.002
Sarper Demirdogen , Ayhan Gurbuz , Kaan Yunkul
{"title":"影响土工格室加固土上条形基脚全仪器模型试验性能的参数","authors":"Sarper Demirdogen ,&nbsp;Ayhan Gurbuz ,&nbsp;Kaan Yunkul","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A thorough study was conducted to assess the performance of the strip footing reinforced with geocells in sand, focusing on understanding the enhancement effects and geocell reinforcement mechanisms. Critical factors such as geocell modulus, height, soil relative density and load eccentricity were examined through fully instrumented model tests. Measurements included surface displacement profiles, strains on the geocell layer, subsurface pressure distribution and other relevant parameters. Results revealed that the strip footing on geocell-reinforced sand beds exhibited better performance compared to those on unreinforced soil, characterized by increased load-carrying capacity and reduced settlements. Notably, stiffer geocells improved performance significantly, with a 40% higher modulus enhancing the bearing pressure by up to 25%, due to better confinement and anchorage effects. Conversely, geocells with a lower modulus demonstrated more effective vertical stress distribution. Furthermore, increased geocell height moderately enhanced footing performance by improving confinement, although wall buckling under eccentric loading limited major gains. Dense soils under centric loading exhibited up to a 20% better improvement in bearing pressure than loose soils due to higher strain mobilization within the geocell layer. These findings highlight the crucial role of geocell and soil properties, as well as loading conditions, in optimizing reinforcement effects for strip footings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"52 6","pages":"Pages 1191-1206"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parameters affecting performance of fully instrumented model testing of strip footings on geocell-reinforced soils\",\"authors\":\"Sarper Demirdogen ,&nbsp;Ayhan Gurbuz ,&nbsp;Kaan Yunkul\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A thorough study was conducted to assess the performance of the strip footing reinforced with geocells in sand, focusing on understanding the enhancement effects and geocell reinforcement mechanisms. Critical factors such as geocell modulus, height, soil relative density and load eccentricity were examined through fully instrumented model tests. Measurements included surface displacement profiles, strains on the geocell layer, subsurface pressure distribution and other relevant parameters. Results revealed that the strip footing on geocell-reinforced sand beds exhibited better performance compared to those on unreinforced soil, characterized by increased load-carrying capacity and reduced settlements. Notably, stiffer geocells improved performance significantly, with a 40% higher modulus enhancing the bearing pressure by up to 25%, due to better confinement and anchorage effects. Conversely, geocells with a lower modulus demonstrated more effective vertical stress distribution. Furthermore, increased geocell height moderately enhanced footing performance by improving confinement, although wall buckling under eccentric loading limited major gains. Dense soils under centric loading exhibited up to a 20% better improvement in bearing pressure than loose soils due to higher strain mobilization within the geocell layer. These findings highlight the crucial role of geocell and soil properties, as well as loading conditions, in optimizing reinforcement effects for strip footings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"52 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1191-1206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424000906\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424000906","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为评估砂土中使用土工格室加固的条形基脚的性能,我们进行了深入研究,重点是了解增强效应和土工格室加固机制。通过全仪器模型试验,对土工格室模量、高度、土壤相对密度和荷载偏心率等关键因素进行了研究。测量包括表面位移曲线、土工格室层的应变、地下压力分布和其他相关参数。结果表明,与未加固的土壤相比,土工格室加固砂层上的条形路基具有更好的性能,其特点是承载能力提高,沉降减少。值得注意的是,较硬的土工格室能显著提高性能,由于更好的约束和锚固效果,模量高出 40% 的土工格室能将承载压力最多提高 25%。相反,模量较低的土工格室则表现出更有效的垂直应力分布。此外,增加土工格室的高度可通过改善密闭性适度提高基脚性能,但偏心荷载下的墙体屈曲限制了主要收益。由于土工格室层内的应变调动能力较强,因此在中心荷载作用下,致密土的承压力比松散土高 20%。这些发现强调了土工格室和土壤特性以及加载条件在优化条形基脚加固效果方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parameters affecting performance of fully instrumented model testing of strip footings on geocell-reinforced soils

A thorough study was conducted to assess the performance of the strip footing reinforced with geocells in sand, focusing on understanding the enhancement effects and geocell reinforcement mechanisms. Critical factors such as geocell modulus, height, soil relative density and load eccentricity were examined through fully instrumented model tests. Measurements included surface displacement profiles, strains on the geocell layer, subsurface pressure distribution and other relevant parameters. Results revealed that the strip footing on geocell-reinforced sand beds exhibited better performance compared to those on unreinforced soil, characterized by increased load-carrying capacity and reduced settlements. Notably, stiffer geocells improved performance significantly, with a 40% higher modulus enhancing the bearing pressure by up to 25%, due to better confinement and anchorage effects. Conversely, geocells with a lower modulus demonstrated more effective vertical stress distribution. Furthermore, increased geocell height moderately enhanced footing performance by improving confinement, although wall buckling under eccentric loading limited major gains. Dense soils under centric loading exhibited up to a 20% better improvement in bearing pressure than loose soils due to higher strain mobilization within the geocell layer. These findings highlight the crucial role of geocell and soil properties, as well as loading conditions, in optimizing reinforcement effects for strip footings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
21.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident. Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Experimental study on vacuum preloading combined with intermittent airbag pressurization for treating dredged sludge Corrigendum to “Seismic response and mitigation measures for T shape retaining wall in liquefiable site” [Geotext. Geomembranes. 53(1), (2025) 331–349] Seismic response and mitigation measures for T shape retaining wall in liquefiable site Stress-strain responses of EPS geofoam upon cyclic simple shearing: Experimental investigations and constitutive modeling A large-size model test study on the consolidation effect of construction waste slurry under self-weight and bottom vacuum preloading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1