Comparison of hemodialysis urea clearance using spent dialysate and Kt/Vurea equations.

Introduction: Dialysis adequacy is traditionally calculated from pre- and post-hemodialysis session serum urea concentrations and expressed as the urea reduction ratio, or Kt/Vurea. However, with increasing hemodiafiltration usage, we wished to determine whether there were any differences between standard Kt/Vurea equations and directly measured spent dialysate urea clearance.

Methods: Urea clearance was measured from collected effluent dialysate and compared with various other methods of Kt/Vurea calculation, including change in total body urea from measuring pre- and post-total body water with bioimpedance and the Watson equation, by standard Kt/V equations, and online clearance measurements using effective ionic dialysance (OLC).

Results: We compared urea clearance in 41 patients, 56.1% male, mean age 69.3 ± 12.6 years with 87.8% treated by hemodiafiltration. Reduction in total body urea was greater when estimating changes in total body urea, compared to measured dialysate losses of 58.4% (48.5-67.6) vs 71.6% (62.1-78), p < 0.01. Sessional urea clearance (Kt/Vurea) was greater using the online Solute-Solver program compared to OLC, median 1.45(1.13-1.75) vs 1.2 (0.93-1.4), and 2nd generation Kt/V equations 1.3 (1.02-1.66), p < 0.01, but not different from estimated total body urea clearance 1.36 (1.15-1.73) and dialysate clearance 1.36 (1.07-1.76). The mean bias compared to the Solute-Solver program was greatest with OLC (-0.25), compared to second-generation equations (-0.02), estimated total body clearance (-0.02) and measured dialysate clearance (-0.01).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the result from equations estimating urea clearance indirectly from pre- and postblood samples from hemo- and hemodiafiltration treatments was highly correlated with direct measurements of dialysate urea clearance.