试图参与但未能成功获得肠癌筛查:在毛利人、太平洋岛屿族裔、亚裔、男性和高贫困地区更有可能。

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.26635/6965.6351
Chey G Dearing, Louise O'Connor, Georgia C Dearing, Bernard McEntee
{"title":"试图参与但未能成功获得肠癌筛查:在毛利人、太平洋岛屿族裔、亚裔、男性和高贫困地区更有可能。","authors":"Chey G Dearing, Louise O'Connor, Georgia C Dearing, Bernard McEntee","doi":"10.26635/6965.6351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In New Zealand, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second highest cause of cancer death. We sought to characterise a unique population, the individuals who attempt to engage one or multiple times with screening yet fail to ever obtain successful screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional descriptive analysis on data from the New Zealand National Bowel Screening Programme 2012 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 7,000 individuals (1.26% of all participants) have attempted but failed to be successfully screened in the national bowel screening programme. Males compared with females (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.17), Asian (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.55-1.77), Māori (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.92-2.24) or Pacific peoples (OR 2.30, 95% CI 2.09-2.52) compared with Europeans had greater odds to attempt but fail to be screened. Māori New Zealand Index of Deprivation (NZDep) quintile five (most deprived) had 4.12 (95% CI 3.64-4.67, plt;0.0001) the odds to attempt but fail to be screened compared with European deprivation quintile one participants (least deprived).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are important variations in the failure to successfully receive CRC screening by gender, age, ethnicity, deprivation level and screening year. We suggest drop-off location checking services for all participants are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attempt to engage, yet failure to obtain successful bowel cancer screening: more likely in Māori, Pacific peoples, Asians, men and high deprivation areas.\",\"authors\":\"Chey G Dearing, Louise O'Connor, Georgia C Dearing, Bernard McEntee\",\"doi\":\"10.26635/6965.6351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In New Zealand, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second highest cause of cancer death. We sought to characterise a unique population, the individuals who attempt to engage one or multiple times with screening yet fail to ever obtain successful screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional descriptive analysis on data from the New Zealand National Bowel Screening Programme 2012 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 7,000 individuals (1.26% of all participants) have attempted but failed to be successfully screened in the national bowel screening programme. Males compared with females (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.17), Asian (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.55-1.77), Māori (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.92-2.24) or Pacific peoples (OR 2.30, 95% CI 2.09-2.52) compared with Europeans had greater odds to attempt but fail to be screened. Māori New Zealand Index of Deprivation (NZDep) quintile five (most deprived) had 4.12 (95% CI 3.64-4.67, plt;0.0001) the odds to attempt but fail to be screened compared with European deprivation quintile one participants (least deprived).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are important variations in the failure to successfully receive CRC screening by gender, age, ethnicity, deprivation level and screening year. We suggest drop-off location checking services for all participants are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在新西兰,结直肠癌(CRC)是第二大癌症死因。我们试图描述一个特殊群体的特征,即试图参与一次或多次筛查,但从未成功筛查的人:这是一项横断面描述性分析,数据来自新西兰 2012 年至 2022 年国家肠道筛查计划:超过7000人(占所有参与者的1.26%)尝试过但未能成功通过国家肠道筛查计划的筛查。与欧洲人相比,男性(OR 1.11,95% CI 1.06-1.17)、亚裔(OR 1.65,95% CI 1.55-1.77)、毛利人(OR 2.07,95% CI 1.92-2.24)或太平洋岛屿族裔(OR 2.30,95% CI 2.09-2.52)尝试筛查但未能成功的几率更大。毛利人新西兰贫困指数(NZDep)五分位数(最贫困)与欧裔贫困五分位数一参与者(最不贫困)相比,尝试筛查但未能筛查的几率为4.12(95% CI 3.64-4.67,plt;0.0001):结论:不同性别、年龄、种族、贫困程度和筛查年份的人未能成功接受 CRC 筛查的几率存在很大差异。我们建议需要为所有参与者提供下车地点检查服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attempt to engage, yet failure to obtain successful bowel cancer screening: more likely in Māori, Pacific peoples, Asians, men and high deprivation areas.

Aim: In New Zealand, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second highest cause of cancer death. We sought to characterise a unique population, the individuals who attempt to engage one or multiple times with screening yet fail to ever obtain successful screening.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive analysis on data from the New Zealand National Bowel Screening Programme 2012 to 2022.

Results: Over 7,000 individuals (1.26% of all participants) have attempted but failed to be successfully screened in the national bowel screening programme. Males compared with females (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.17), Asian (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.55-1.77), Māori (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.92-2.24) or Pacific peoples (OR 2.30, 95% CI 2.09-2.52) compared with Europeans had greater odds to attempt but fail to be screened. Māori New Zealand Index of Deprivation (NZDep) quintile five (most deprived) had 4.12 (95% CI 3.64-4.67, plt;0.0001) the odds to attempt but fail to be screened compared with European deprivation quintile one participants (least deprived).

Conclusions: There are important variations in the failure to successfully receive CRC screening by gender, age, ethnicity, deprivation level and screening year. We suggest drop-off location checking services for all participants are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
期刊最新文献
A quality improvement project: Rapid Access Hysteroscopy Clinics with nurse pre-procedural telephone support in the outpatient setting. Accuracy of ethnicity records at primary and secondary healthcare services in Waikato region, Aotearoa New Zealand. Caution ahead: the risks with regulating physician associates in Aotearoa. Commissioners or board-which is best for the role of Health New Zealand - Te Whatu Ora? Compartment syndrome resulting from carbon monoxide poisoning: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1