德文版痴呆症患者参与量表:翻译和初步应用经验。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1007/s00391-024-02346-9
Kathrin Seibert, Dominik Domhoff, Jacob Fricke, Karin Wolf-Ostermann
{"title":"德文版痴呆症患者参与量表:翻译和初步应用经验。","authors":"Kathrin Seibert, Dominik Domhoff, Jacob Fricke, Karin Wolf-Ostermann","doi":"10.1007/s00391-024-02346-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment tools for engagement in people with dementia often rely on self-reported measures which restricts their use in people with severe cognitive limitations. The Engagement of a Person with Dementia Scale (EPWDS) is a valid and reliable tool to assess behavioral and emotional expressions and responses of engagement in people with dementia through observation; however, the EPWDS is not yet available in the German language.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) Translation and cross-culturally adaptation of the original English version of the EPWDS into the German language (EPWDS-GER) and 2) to gain insights into assessing data with the newly developed instrument.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>International recommendations were followed to cross-culturally adapt the English original version of the EPWDS into the German language in 5 steps: translation by three independent translators, synthesis, back translation, expert committee review (N = 10) and test of the prefinal version in nursing practice (N = 22) on a 5-point Likert scale to assess comprehensibility, practicability and suitability of the EPWDS-GER.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EPWDS-GER achieved high ratings for the five subscales on ease of understanding, ease of answering and importance of single items for assessing engagement. Average agreement for all items ranged from 3.86 to 4.43 (SD = 0.68-1.29). Overall rating of EPWDS-GER resulted in a mean agreement of 4.18 (SD = 0.73) for suitability and of 4.09 (SD = 0.81) for practicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EPWDS-GER is an easy to use tool for measuring behavioral and emotional expressions and responses of engagement of a person with dementia and can now be utilized in clinical practice and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"German version of the engagement of a person with dementia scale: translation and initial application experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Kathrin Seibert, Dominik Domhoff, Jacob Fricke, Karin Wolf-Ostermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00391-024-02346-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment tools for engagement in people with dementia often rely on self-reported measures which restricts their use in people with severe cognitive limitations. The Engagement of a Person with Dementia Scale (EPWDS) is a valid and reliable tool to assess behavioral and emotional expressions and responses of engagement in people with dementia through observation; however, the EPWDS is not yet available in the German language.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) Translation and cross-culturally adaptation of the original English version of the EPWDS into the German language (EPWDS-GER) and 2) to gain insights into assessing data with the newly developed instrument.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>International recommendations were followed to cross-culturally adapt the English original version of the EPWDS into the German language in 5 steps: translation by three independent translators, synthesis, back translation, expert committee review (N = 10) and test of the prefinal version in nursing practice (N = 22) on a 5-point Likert scale to assess comprehensibility, practicability and suitability of the EPWDS-GER.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EPWDS-GER achieved high ratings for the five subscales on ease of understanding, ease of answering and importance of single items for assessing engagement. Average agreement for all items ranged from 3.86 to 4.43 (SD = 0.68-1.29). Overall rating of EPWDS-GER resulted in a mean agreement of 4.18 (SD = 0.73) for suitability and of 4.09 (SD = 0.81) for practicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EPWDS-GER is an easy to use tool for measuring behavioral and emotional expressions and responses of engagement of a person with dementia and can now be utilized in clinical practice and research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-024-02346-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-024-02346-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:痴呆症患者参与度的评估工具通常依赖于自我报告,这限制了它们在认知能力严重受限的患者中的应用。痴呆症患者参与度量表(EPWDS)是通过观察评估痴呆症患者参与度的行为和情绪表达及反应的有效而可靠的工具;然而,EPWDS尚未有德语版本:1) 将 EPWDS 的英文原版翻译成德文并进行跨文化改编(EPWDS-GER);2) 深入了解如何使用新开发的工具评估数据:按照国际建议,将 EPWDS 的英文原版跨文化改编为德语,共分为 5 个步骤:由三名独立译者翻译、合成、回译、专家委员会审查(10 人)和在护理实践中测试最终版本(22 人),采用 5 分李克特量表评估 EPWDS-GER 的可理解性、实用性和适用性:结果:EPWDS-GER 的五个分量表在易懂性、易回答性和单个项目对评估参与度的重要性方面都获得了较高的评分。所有项目的平均同意度在 3.86 至 4.43 之间(SD = 0.68-1.29)。对 EPWDS-GER 的总体评分结果是,适用性的平均同意度为 4.18(标准差 = 0.73),实用性的平均同意度为 4.09(标准差 = 0.81):EPWDS-GER是一种易于使用的工具,可用于测量痴呆症患者的行为和情绪表达以及参与反应,现已可用于临床实践和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
German version of the engagement of a person with dementia scale: translation and initial application experiences.

Background: Assessment tools for engagement in people with dementia often rely on self-reported measures which restricts their use in people with severe cognitive limitations. The Engagement of a Person with Dementia Scale (EPWDS) is a valid and reliable tool to assess behavioral and emotional expressions and responses of engagement in people with dementia through observation; however, the EPWDS is not yet available in the German language.

Objectives: 1) Translation and cross-culturally adaptation of the original English version of the EPWDS into the German language (EPWDS-GER) and 2) to gain insights into assessing data with the newly developed instrument.

Material and methods: International recommendations were followed to cross-culturally adapt the English original version of the EPWDS into the German language in 5 steps: translation by three independent translators, synthesis, back translation, expert committee review (N = 10) and test of the prefinal version in nursing practice (N = 22) on a 5-point Likert scale to assess comprehensibility, practicability and suitability of the EPWDS-GER.

Results: The EPWDS-GER achieved high ratings for the five subscales on ease of understanding, ease of answering and importance of single items for assessing engagement. Average agreement for all items ranged from 3.86 to 4.43 (SD = 0.68-1.29). Overall rating of EPWDS-GER resulted in a mean agreement of 4.18 (SD = 0.73) for suitability and of 4.09 (SD = 0.81) for practicability.

Conclusion: The EPWDS-GER is an easy to use tool for measuring behavioral and emotional expressions and responses of engagement of a person with dementia and can now be utilized in clinical practice and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
期刊最新文献
[Risk assessment in geriatric traumatology : Crucial role of anesthesiology]. Distress of surgical nursing personnel in dealing with patients with dementia : An integrative review. [Update atrial fibrillation in older adults]. Mitteilungen der DGG. Mitteilungen der DGGG.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1