用于 GNSS-R 风速检索的深度残差全连接网络及其解释

IF 11.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Remote Sensing of Environment Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114375
{"title":"用于 GNSS-R 风速检索的深度残差全连接网络及其解释","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2024.114375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Global navigation satellite system reflectometry (GNSS-R) has emerged as a new technique to provide L-band bistatic measurements for ocean wind speed retrieval, in which traditional geophysical model functions (GMFs) or shallow neural networks (NNs) are normally used. However, it is still challenging to identify and consider all relevant parameters in the GMF. Meanwhile, NN models face limitations due to the degradation problem, which restricts their depth and consequently their performance. Furthermore, the interpretation of NN models for GNSS-R wind retrieval is another issue. To this end, we propose a residual fully connected network (RFCN) fusing auxiliary information such as geometry, receiver gain, significant wave height, and current speed with track-wise corrected <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>. Referred to the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) ERA5 wind product, the root mean square error (RMSE) and bias of RFCN winds are 1.031 m/s and -0.0003 m/s, respectively, with a 6% improvement in RMSE compared to debiased NOAA Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) Version 1.2 (V1.2) wind speed retrieval. Moreover, in an intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) area with large current speeds, the RMSE and bias are 1.006 m/s and -0.022 m/s: an improvement of 11.6% and 87.9% compared to debiased NOAA CYGNSS V1.2 winds. The bias ‘strips’ in these areas are nearly eliminated. Daily averaged error analyses also demonstrate that RFCN winds are more robust and consistent with ECMWF winds. For wind speeds larger than 20 m/s, referred to Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Level 3 final wind products, the RMSE and bias of fine-tuning RFCN (FT_RFCN) winds are reduced by 25.7% and 91.5% compared to NOAA winds. Finally, the RMSE and bias of retrievals in tropical cyclones, measured by Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) during 2021-2022, reveal an improvement of 3.5% and 21.2% compared to NOAA winds. Through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) models developed for RFCN and FT_RFCN, the contribution of each feature is quantitatively evaluated, while providing insights into their interactions within the ‘black-box’ NN models with clear physical meanings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":417,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing of Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425724004012/pdfft?md5=a2ed0e9eca433424ca0050057487e60b&pid=1-s2.0-S0034425724004012-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep residual fully connected network for GNSS-R wind speed retrieval and its interpretation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rse.2024.114375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Global navigation satellite system reflectometry (GNSS-R) has emerged as a new technique to provide L-band bistatic measurements for ocean wind speed retrieval, in which traditional geophysical model functions (GMFs) or shallow neural networks (NNs) are normally used. However, it is still challenging to identify and consider all relevant parameters in the GMF. Meanwhile, NN models face limitations due to the degradation problem, which restricts their depth and consequently their performance. Furthermore, the interpretation of NN models for GNSS-R wind retrieval is another issue. To this end, we propose a residual fully connected network (RFCN) fusing auxiliary information such as geometry, receiver gain, significant wave height, and current speed with track-wise corrected <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>. Referred to the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) ERA5 wind product, the root mean square error (RMSE) and bias of RFCN winds are 1.031 m/s and -0.0003 m/s, respectively, with a 6% improvement in RMSE compared to debiased NOAA Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) Version 1.2 (V1.2) wind speed retrieval. Moreover, in an intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) area with large current speeds, the RMSE and bias are 1.006 m/s and -0.022 m/s: an improvement of 11.6% and 87.9% compared to debiased NOAA CYGNSS V1.2 winds. The bias ‘strips’ in these areas are nearly eliminated. Daily averaged error analyses also demonstrate that RFCN winds are more robust and consistent with ECMWF winds. For wind speeds larger than 20 m/s, referred to Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Level 3 final wind products, the RMSE and bias of fine-tuning RFCN (FT_RFCN) winds are reduced by 25.7% and 91.5% compared to NOAA winds. Finally, the RMSE and bias of retrievals in tropical cyclones, measured by Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) during 2021-2022, reveal an improvement of 3.5% and 21.2% compared to NOAA winds. Through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) models developed for RFCN and FT_RFCN, the contribution of each feature is quantitatively evaluated, while providing insights into their interactions within the ‘black-box’ NN models with clear physical meanings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425724004012/pdfft?md5=a2ed0e9eca433424ca0050057487e60b&pid=1-s2.0-S0034425724004012-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425724004012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425724004012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球导航卫星系统反射测量(GNSS-R)已成为一种新技术,可为海洋风速检索提供 L 波段双向测量,通常使用传统的地球物理模型函数(GMF)或浅层神经网络(NN)。然而,在 GMF 中识别和考虑所有相关参数仍具有挑战性。同时,由于退化问题,神经网络模型面临着局限性,这限制了其深度,进而限制了其性能。此外,如何解释用于 GNSS-R 风检索的 NN 模型是另一个问题。为此,我们提出了一种残差全连接网络(RFCN),它融合了几何形状、接收器增益、显著波高和海流速度等辅助信息,并具有轨迹校正σ0。参考欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)ERA5 风产品,RFCN 风的均方根误差(RMSE)和偏差分别为 1.031 米/秒和-0.0003 米/秒,与有偏差的 NOAA 气旋全球导航卫星系统(CYGNSS)1.2 版(V1.2)风速检索相比,均方根误差提高了 6%。此外,在具有较大流速的热带辐合带(ITCZ)区域,均方根误差和偏差分别为 1.006 米/秒和-0.022 米/秒:与经过去噪的 NOAA CYGNSS V1.2 版风速相比,分别提高了 11.6% 和 87.9%。这些区域的偏差 "条纹 "几乎消除。日平均误差分析也表明,RFCN 风更稳定,与 ECMWF 风更一致。对于大于 20 米/秒的风速,即土壤水分主动被动(SMAP)第 3 级最终风产品,与 NOAA 风相比,微调 RFCN(FT_RFCN)风的均方根误差和偏差分别减少了 25.7% 和 91.5%。最后,2021-2022 年期间由步进频率微波辐射计(SFMR)测量的热带气旋检索的均方根误差和偏差与 NOAA 风相比分别提高了 3.5%和 21.2%。通过为 RFCN 和 FT_RFCN 开发的 SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)模型,对每个特征的贡献进行了定量评估,同时深入分析了它们在具有明确物理意义的 "黑箱 "NN 模型中的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep residual fully connected network for GNSS-R wind speed retrieval and its interpretation

Global navigation satellite system reflectometry (GNSS-R) has emerged as a new technique to provide L-band bistatic measurements for ocean wind speed retrieval, in which traditional geophysical model functions (GMFs) or shallow neural networks (NNs) are normally used. However, it is still challenging to identify and consider all relevant parameters in the GMF. Meanwhile, NN models face limitations due to the degradation problem, which restricts their depth and consequently their performance. Furthermore, the interpretation of NN models for GNSS-R wind retrieval is another issue. To this end, we propose a residual fully connected network (RFCN) fusing auxiliary information such as geometry, receiver gain, significant wave height, and current speed with track-wise corrected σ0. Referred to the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) ERA5 wind product, the root mean square error (RMSE) and bias of RFCN winds are 1.031 m/s and -0.0003 m/s, respectively, with a 6% improvement in RMSE compared to debiased NOAA Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) Version 1.2 (V1.2) wind speed retrieval. Moreover, in an intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) area with large current speeds, the RMSE and bias are 1.006 m/s and -0.022 m/s: an improvement of 11.6% and 87.9% compared to debiased NOAA CYGNSS V1.2 winds. The bias ‘strips’ in these areas are nearly eliminated. Daily averaged error analyses also demonstrate that RFCN winds are more robust and consistent with ECMWF winds. For wind speeds larger than 20 m/s, referred to Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Level 3 final wind products, the RMSE and bias of fine-tuning RFCN (FT_RFCN) winds are reduced by 25.7% and 91.5% compared to NOAA winds. Finally, the RMSE and bias of retrievals in tropical cyclones, measured by Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) during 2021-2022, reveal an improvement of 3.5% and 21.2% compared to NOAA winds. Through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) models developed for RFCN and FT_RFCN, the contribution of each feature is quantitatively evaluated, while providing insights into their interactions within the ‘black-box’ NN models with clear physical meanings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Remote Sensing of Environment
Remote Sensing of Environment 环境科学-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
8.90%
发文量
455
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Remote Sensing of Environment (RSE) serves the Earth observation community by disseminating results on the theory, science, applications, and technology that contribute to advancing the field of remote sensing. With a thoroughly interdisciplinary approach, RSE encompasses terrestrial, oceanic, and atmospheric sensing. The journal emphasizes biophysical and quantitative approaches to remote sensing at local to global scales, covering a diverse range of applications and techniques. RSE serves as a vital platform for the exchange of knowledge and advancements in the dynamic field of remote sensing.
期刊最新文献
Satellite-based estimation of monthly mean hourly 1-km urban air temperature using a diurnal temperature cycle model Towards robust validation strategies for EO flood maps Observation-based quantification of aerosol transport using optical flow: A satellite perspective to characterize interregional transport of atmospheric pollution TIRVolcH: Thermal Infrared Recognition of Volcanic Hotspots. A single band TIR-based algorithm to detect low-to-high thermal anomalies in volcanic regions. Stability of cloud detection methods for Land Surface Temperature (LST) Climate Data Records (CDRs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1