{"title":"数字化国家等候时间信息系统--芬兰公共口腔医疗管理人员的观点","authors":"Riitta Söderlund","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The study evaluated the digital national waiting time information system from the point of view of oral healthcare managers in Finland in 2021. The information system (IS) was implemented in 2014, primarily to monitor waiting times in public healthcare. The system reported the information on realised waiting times on the Internet.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We gathered the data using a cross-sectional survey. Evaluating the system was based on a modified IS success model with the dimensions of information quality, system quality, individual impact and organisational impact. We used convenience sampling when including in the study managers working in public primary oral healthcare in the spring of 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The managers (n = 97) perceived it as easy to access the waiting time information on one website, but they evaluated the information as low quality. The information on realised waiting times supported them in the management of current waiting times to a minor degree. The managers associated the information inaccuracy in the national system with dental nurses’ poor data entry in electronic patient ISs in oral healthcare organisations. The inaccuracy meant that waiting time monitoring data was not valid.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our modified IS success model was sufficient to ascertain that poor information quality likely influenced the effectiveness of managers in information-driven waiting time management. Information must be relevant and accurate to promote the success of ISs. Further research is required to explore how to improve the design of national ISs from the point of view of different stakeholders in healthcare.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 4","pages":"Article 100900"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000637/pdfft?md5=26b3e1ce5de183cf2bdc9ec92b965b79&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883724000637-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital national waiting time information system - View of Finnish public oral healthcare managers\",\"authors\":\"Riitta Söderlund\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The study evaluated the digital national waiting time information system from the point of view of oral healthcare managers in Finland in 2021. The information system (IS) was implemented in 2014, primarily to monitor waiting times in public healthcare. The system reported the information on realised waiting times on the Internet.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We gathered the data using a cross-sectional survey. Evaluating the system was based on a modified IS success model with the dimensions of information quality, system quality, individual impact and organisational impact. We used convenience sampling when including in the study managers working in public primary oral healthcare in the spring of 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The managers (n = 97) perceived it as easy to access the waiting time information on one website, but they evaluated the information as low quality. The information on realised waiting times supported them in the management of current waiting times to a minor degree. The managers associated the information inaccuracy in the national system with dental nurses’ poor data entry in electronic patient ISs in oral healthcare organisations. The inaccuracy meant that waiting time monitoring data was not valid.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our modified IS success model was sufficient to ascertain that poor information quality likely influenced the effectiveness of managers in information-driven waiting time management. Information must be relevant and accurate to promote the success of ISs. Further research is required to explore how to improve the design of national ISs from the point of view of different stakeholders in healthcare.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100900\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000637/pdfft?md5=26b3e1ce5de183cf2bdc9ec92b965b79&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883724000637-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000637\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital national waiting time information system - View of Finnish public oral healthcare managers
Objectives
The study evaluated the digital national waiting time information system from the point of view of oral healthcare managers in Finland in 2021. The information system (IS) was implemented in 2014, primarily to monitor waiting times in public healthcare. The system reported the information on realised waiting times on the Internet.
Methods
We gathered the data using a cross-sectional survey. Evaluating the system was based on a modified IS success model with the dimensions of information quality, system quality, individual impact and organisational impact. We used convenience sampling when including in the study managers working in public primary oral healthcare in the spring of 2021.
Results
The managers (n = 97) perceived it as easy to access the waiting time information on one website, but they evaluated the information as low quality. The information on realised waiting times supported them in the management of current waiting times to a minor degree. The managers associated the information inaccuracy in the national system with dental nurses’ poor data entry in electronic patient ISs in oral healthcare organisations. The inaccuracy meant that waiting time monitoring data was not valid.
Conclusions
Our modified IS success model was sufficient to ascertain that poor information quality likely influenced the effectiveness of managers in information-driven waiting time management. Information must be relevant and accurate to promote the success of ISs. Further research is required to explore how to improve the design of national ISs from the point of view of different stakeholders in healthcare.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics