东欧亚地区被子植物物种的系统发育结构模式及其决定因素

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Global Ecology and Biogeography Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1111/geb.13897
Wenqi Song, Yichao Li, Ao Luo, Xiangyan Su, Yunpeng Liu, Yuan Luo, Ke Jiang, Denis Sandanov, Wei Wang, Zhiheng Wang
{"title":"东欧亚地区被子植物物种的系统发育结构模式及其决定因素","authors":"Wenqi Song,&nbsp;Yichao Li,&nbsp;Ao Luo,&nbsp;Xiangyan Su,&nbsp;Yunpeng Liu,&nbsp;Yuan Luo,&nbsp;Ke Jiang,&nbsp;Denis Sandanov,&nbsp;Wei Wang,&nbsp;Zhiheng Wang","doi":"10.1111/geb.13897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework requires that evolutionary histories of species should be considered in conservation planning. The phylogenetic structure of species assemblages quantifies species evolutionary histories and increasingly becomes an endeavour for ecologists. Understanding the geographic patterns of phylogenetic structure of species assemblages and their drivers can provide a fundamental reference for conservation planning. Although several theoretical hypotheses based on the effects of contemporary environment, historical climate change and evolutionary niche conservatism had been widely discussed in previous studies, the relative contributions of these hypotheses on phylogenetic structure of angiosperms, especially herbaceous species, remain debated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>East Eurasia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Angiosperms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We compiled distributions of 43,023 angiosperm species in east Eurasia at spatial resolution (100 × 100 km<sup>2</sup>). Using this newly compiled database and a species-level phylogeny, we estimated the phylogenetic structure patterns for species with different growth forms. We explored the relationships of these patterns with contemporary environment and historical climate change to test predictions of the tropical niche conservatism hypothesis (TCH) and to compare the contribution of different hypotheses using generalised linear models and hierarchical partitioning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that phylogenetic structure of angiosperms displayed significant latitudinal gradients. Notably, phylogenetic structure patterns and their drivers differed between woody and herbaceous species. Actual evapotranspiration was the best predictor of phylogenetic structure patterns for all and herbaceous species, while the mean temperature of the coldest quarter was the best predictor for woody species. The effect of historical climate change on phylogenetic structure patterns was weak.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results suggest that the TCH only explains the phylogenetic structure pattern of woody species, not herbaceous species. Moreover, contemporary climate influences the phylogenetic structure of angiosperms in east Eurasian by affecting herbaceous and woody species differently.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"33 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Phylogenetic Structure Patterns of Angiosperm Species and Their Determinants in East Eurasia\",\"authors\":\"Wenqi Song,&nbsp;Yichao Li,&nbsp;Ao Luo,&nbsp;Xiangyan Su,&nbsp;Yunpeng Liu,&nbsp;Yuan Luo,&nbsp;Ke Jiang,&nbsp;Denis Sandanov,&nbsp;Wei Wang,&nbsp;Zhiheng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.13897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework requires that evolutionary histories of species should be considered in conservation planning. The phylogenetic structure of species assemblages quantifies species evolutionary histories and increasingly becomes an endeavour for ecologists. Understanding the geographic patterns of phylogenetic structure of species assemblages and their drivers can provide a fundamental reference for conservation planning. Although several theoretical hypotheses based on the effects of contemporary environment, historical climate change and evolutionary niche conservatism had been widely discussed in previous studies, the relative contributions of these hypotheses on phylogenetic structure of angiosperms, especially herbaceous species, remain debated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>East Eurasia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Angiosperms.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We compiled distributions of 43,023 angiosperm species in east Eurasia at spatial resolution (100 × 100 km<sup>2</sup>). Using this newly compiled database and a species-level phylogeny, we estimated the phylogenetic structure patterns for species with different growth forms. We explored the relationships of these patterns with contemporary environment and historical climate change to test predictions of the tropical niche conservatism hypothesis (TCH) and to compare the contribution of different hypotheses using generalised linear models and hierarchical partitioning.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found that phylogenetic structure of angiosperms displayed significant latitudinal gradients. Notably, phylogenetic structure patterns and their drivers differed between woody and herbaceous species. Actual evapotranspiration was the best predictor of phylogenetic structure patterns for all and herbaceous species, while the mean temperature of the coldest quarter was the best predictor for woody species. The effect of historical climate change on phylogenetic structure patterns was weak.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our results suggest that the TCH only explains the phylogenetic structure pattern of woody species, not herbaceous species. Moreover, contemporary climate influences the phylogenetic structure of angiosperms in east Eurasian by affecting herbaceous and woody species differently.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"33 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13897\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13897","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》要求在保护规划中考虑物种的进化史。物种集合的系统发育结构可以量化物种的进化历史,日益成为生态学家的一项工作。了解物种群系统发育结构的地理模式及其驱动因素可为保护规划提供基本参考。尽管基于当代环境、历史气候变化和进化生态位保守性影响的几种理论假说在以往的研究中被广泛讨论,但这些假说对被子植物(尤其是草本物种)系统发育结构的相对贡献仍存在争议。方法我们以空间分辨率(100 × 100 km2)编制了东欧亚大陆 43023 种被子植物的分布。利用这个新编制的数据库和物种水平的系统发育,我们估计了具有不同生长形式的物种的系统发育结构模式。我们探讨了这些模式与当代环境和历史气候变化之间的关系,以检验热带生态位保守主义假说(TCH)的预测,并利用广义线性模型和层次划分法比较了不同假说的贡献。值得注意的是,木本植物和草本植物的系统发生结构模式及其驱动因素各不相同。实际蒸散量是所有植物和草本植物系统发育结构模式的最佳预测因子,而最冷季度的平均气温则是木本植物系统发育结构模式的最佳预测因子。主要结论我们的研究结果表明,TCH 只能解释木本物种的系统发生结构模式,而不能解释草本物种的系统发生结构模式。此外,当代气候对欧亚大陆东部被子植物系统发育结构的影响是通过对草本和木本物种的不同影响来实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Phylogenetic Structure Patterns of Angiosperm Species and Their Determinants in East Eurasia

Aim

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework requires that evolutionary histories of species should be considered in conservation planning. The phylogenetic structure of species assemblages quantifies species evolutionary histories and increasingly becomes an endeavour for ecologists. Understanding the geographic patterns of phylogenetic structure of species assemblages and their drivers can provide a fundamental reference for conservation planning. Although several theoretical hypotheses based on the effects of contemporary environment, historical climate change and evolutionary niche conservatism had been widely discussed in previous studies, the relative contributions of these hypotheses on phylogenetic structure of angiosperms, especially herbaceous species, remain debated.

Location

East Eurasia.

Major Taxa Studied

Angiosperms.

Methods

We compiled distributions of 43,023 angiosperm species in east Eurasia at spatial resolution (100 × 100 km2). Using this newly compiled database and a species-level phylogeny, we estimated the phylogenetic structure patterns for species with different growth forms. We explored the relationships of these patterns with contemporary environment and historical climate change to test predictions of the tropical niche conservatism hypothesis (TCH) and to compare the contribution of different hypotheses using generalised linear models and hierarchical partitioning.

Results

We found that phylogenetic structure of angiosperms displayed significant latitudinal gradients. Notably, phylogenetic structure patterns and their drivers differed between woody and herbaceous species. Actual evapotranspiration was the best predictor of phylogenetic structure patterns for all and herbaceous species, while the mean temperature of the coldest quarter was the best predictor for woody species. The effect of historical climate change on phylogenetic structure patterns was weak.

Main Conclusions

Our results suggest that the TCH only explains the phylogenetic structure pattern of woody species, not herbaceous species. Moreover, contemporary climate influences the phylogenetic structure of angiosperms in east Eurasian by affecting herbaceous and woody species differently.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
期刊最新文献
Fine-Grain Predictions Are Key to Accurately Represent Continental-Scale Biodiversity Patterns Issue Information Thermal Forcing Versus Chilling? Misspecification of Temperature Controls in Spring Phenology Models Predicting Landscape Conversion Impact on Small Mammal Occurrence and the Transmission of Parasites in the Atlantic Forest Spatial Variation in Upper Limits of Coral Cover on the Great Barrier Reef
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1