用于男性不育基因诊断测试的创新型一体化外显子组测序策略:验证和 10 个月的经验。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1111/andr.13742
Manon S Oud, Nicole de Leeuw, Dominique F C M Smeets, Liliana Ramos, Godfried W van der Heijden, Raoul G J Timmermans, Maartje van de Vorst, Tom Hofste, Marlies J E Kempers, Marijn F Stokman, Kathleen W M D'Hauwers, Brigitte H W Faas, Dineke Westra
{"title":"用于男性不育基因诊断测试的创新型一体化外显子组测序策略:验证和 10 个月的经验。","authors":"Manon S Oud, Nicole de Leeuw, Dominique F C M Smeets, Liliana Ramos, Godfried W van der Heijden, Raoul G J Timmermans, Maartje van de Vorst, Tom Hofste, Marlies J E Kempers, Marijn F Stokman, Kathleen W M D'Hauwers, Brigitte H W Faas, Dineke Westra","doi":"10.1111/andr.13742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines indicate that patients with extreme oligozoospermia or azoospermia should be tested for chromosomal imbalances, azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions and/or CFTR variants. For other sperm abnormalities, no genetic diagnostics are recommended.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether exome sequencing (ES) with combined copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis is a reliable first-tier method to replace current methods (validation study), and to evaluate the diagnostic yield after 10 months of implementation (evaluation study).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the validation study, ES was performed on DNA of patients already diagnosed with AZF deletions (n = 17), (non-)mosaic sex chromosomal aneuploidies or structural chromosomal anomalies (n = 37), CFTR variants (n = 26), or variants in known infertility genes (n = 4), and 90 controls. The data were analyzed using our standard diagnostic pipeline, with a bioinformatic filter for 130 male infertility genes. In the evaluation study, results of 292 clinical exomes were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All previously reported variants in the validation cohort, including clinically relevant Y-chromosomal microdeletions, were correctly identified and reliably detected. In the evaluation study, we identified one or more clinically relevant genetic anomalies in 67 of 292 of all cases (22.9%): these included aberrations that could have been detected with current methods in 30 of 67 patients (10.2% of total), (possible) (mono)genetic causes in the male infertility gene panel in 28 of 67 patients (9.6%), and carriership of cystic fibrosis in nine of 67 patients (3.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ES is a reliable first-tier method to detect the most common genetic causes of male infertility and, as additional genetic causes can be detected, in our evaluation cohort the diagnostic yield almost doubled (10.2%-19.8%, excluding CF carriers). A genetic diagnosis provides answers on the cause of infertility and helps the professionals in the counseling for treatment, possible co-morbidities and risk for offspring and/or family members. Karyotyping will still remain necessary for detecting balanced translocations or low-grade chromosomal mosaicism.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative all-in-one exome sequencing strategy for diagnostic genetic testing in male infertility: Validation and 10-month experience.\",\"authors\":\"Manon S Oud, Nicole de Leeuw, Dominique F C M Smeets, Liliana Ramos, Godfried W van der Heijden, Raoul G J Timmermans, Maartje van de Vorst, Tom Hofste, Marlies J E Kempers, Marijn F Stokman, Kathleen W M D'Hauwers, Brigitte H W Faas, Dineke Westra\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/andr.13742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines indicate that patients with extreme oligozoospermia or azoospermia should be tested for chromosomal imbalances, azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions and/or CFTR variants. For other sperm abnormalities, no genetic diagnostics are recommended.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether exome sequencing (ES) with combined copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis is a reliable first-tier method to replace current methods (validation study), and to evaluate the diagnostic yield after 10 months of implementation (evaluation study).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the validation study, ES was performed on DNA of patients already diagnosed with AZF deletions (n = 17), (non-)mosaic sex chromosomal aneuploidies or structural chromosomal anomalies (n = 37), CFTR variants (n = 26), or variants in known infertility genes (n = 4), and 90 controls. The data were analyzed using our standard diagnostic pipeline, with a bioinformatic filter for 130 male infertility genes. In the evaluation study, results of 292 clinical exomes were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All previously reported variants in the validation cohort, including clinically relevant Y-chromosomal microdeletions, were correctly identified and reliably detected. In the evaluation study, we identified one or more clinically relevant genetic anomalies in 67 of 292 of all cases (22.9%): these included aberrations that could have been detected with current methods in 30 of 67 patients (10.2% of total), (possible) (mono)genetic causes in the male infertility gene panel in 28 of 67 patients (9.6%), and carriership of cystic fibrosis in nine of 67 patients (3.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ES is a reliable first-tier method to detect the most common genetic causes of male infertility and, as additional genetic causes can be detected, in our evaluation cohort the diagnostic yield almost doubled (10.2%-19.8%, excluding CF carriers). A genetic diagnosis provides answers on the cause of infertility and helps the professionals in the counseling for treatment, possible co-morbidities and risk for offspring and/or family members. Karyotyping will still remain necessary for detecting balanced translocations or low-grade chromosomal mosaicism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13742\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13742","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现行指南指出,极端少精子症或无精子症患者应进行染色体失衡、无精子症因子(AZF)缺失和/或 CFTR 变异检测。对于其他精子异常,不建议进行基因诊断:确定结合拷贝数变异(CNV)和单核苷酸变异(SNV)分析的外显子组测序(ES)是否是取代现有方法的可靠的一级方法(验证研究),并评估实施 10 个月后的诊断率(评估研究):在验证研究中,对已确诊为AZF缺失(17例)、(非)镶嵌性染色体非整倍体或染色体结构异常(37例)、CFTR变异(26例)或已知不孕症基因变异(4例)的患者以及90名对照者的DNA进行了ES分析。数据采用我们的标准诊断管道进行分析,并对 130 个男性不育基因进行了生物信息学筛选。在评估研究中,包括了292个临床外显子组的结果:结果:验证队列中所有之前报道过的变异,包括与临床相关的Y染色体微缺失,都得到了正确识别和可靠检测。在评估研究中,我们在所有 292 例病例中的 67 例(22.9%)中发现了一种或多种临床相关的遗传异常:其中包括 67 例患者中的 30 例(占总数的 10.2%)可以用现有方法检测到的畸变、67 例患者中的 28 例(9.6%)男性不育基因面板中的(可能)(单)遗传原因,以及 67 例患者中的 9 例(3.1%)囊性纤维化携带者:ES是检测男性不育最常见遗传原因的第一级可靠方法,由于可以检测到其他遗传原因,在我们的评估队列中,诊断率几乎翻了一番(10.2%-19.8%,不包括CF携带者)。基因诊断可提供不育原因的答案,并帮助专业人员提供治疗咨询、可能的并发症以及对后代和/或家庭成员的风险。仍有必要进行核型分析,以检测平衡易位或低度染色体嵌合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Innovative all-in-one exome sequencing strategy for diagnostic genetic testing in male infertility: Validation and 10-month experience.

Background: Current guidelines indicate that patients with extreme oligozoospermia or azoospermia should be tested for chromosomal imbalances, azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions and/or CFTR variants. For other sperm abnormalities, no genetic diagnostics are recommended.

Objectives: To determine whether exome sequencing (ES) with combined copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis is a reliable first-tier method to replace current methods (validation study), and to evaluate the diagnostic yield after 10 months of implementation (evaluation study).

Materials and methods: In the validation study, ES was performed on DNA of patients already diagnosed with AZF deletions (n = 17), (non-)mosaic sex chromosomal aneuploidies or structural chromosomal anomalies (n = 37), CFTR variants (n = 26), or variants in known infertility genes (n = 4), and 90 controls. The data were analyzed using our standard diagnostic pipeline, with a bioinformatic filter for 130 male infertility genes. In the evaluation study, results of 292 clinical exomes were included.

Results: All previously reported variants in the validation cohort, including clinically relevant Y-chromosomal microdeletions, were correctly identified and reliably detected. In the evaluation study, we identified one or more clinically relevant genetic anomalies in 67 of 292 of all cases (22.9%): these included aberrations that could have been detected with current methods in 30 of 67 patients (10.2% of total), (possible) (mono)genetic causes in the male infertility gene panel in 28 of 67 patients (9.6%), and carriership of cystic fibrosis in nine of 67 patients (3.1%).

Conclusion: ES is a reliable first-tier method to detect the most common genetic causes of male infertility and, as additional genetic causes can be detected, in our evaluation cohort the diagnostic yield almost doubled (10.2%-19.8%, excluding CF carriers). A genetic diagnosis provides answers on the cause of infertility and helps the professionals in the counseling for treatment, possible co-morbidities and risk for offspring and/or family members. Karyotyping will still remain necessary for detecting balanced translocations or low-grade chromosomal mosaicism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Current status and obstacles of narrowing yield gaps of four major crops. Cold shock treatment alleviates pitting in sweet cherry fruit by enhancing antioxidant enzymes activity and regulating membrane lipid metabolism. Removal of proteins and lipids affects structure, in vitro digestion and physicochemical properties of rice flour modified by heat-moisture treatment. Investigating the impact of climate variables on the organic honey yield in Turkey using XGBoost machine learning. Evaluation of the potential of achachairu peel (Garcinia humilis) for the fortification of cereal-based foods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1