规划样本量,精确、可靠地估算全局获胜概率。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Contemporary clinical trials Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107665
Di Shu , Guangyong Zou
{"title":"规划样本量,精确、可靠地估算全局获胜概率。","authors":"Di Shu ,&nbsp;Guangyong Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Randomized controlled trials commonly employ multiple endpoints to collectively assess the intended effects of the new intervention on multiple aspects of the disease. Focusing on the estimation of the global win probability (WinP), defined as the (weighted) mean of the WinPs across the endpoints that a treated participant would have a better outcome than a control participant, we propose a closed-form sample size formula incorporating pre-specified precision and assurance, with precision denoted by the lower limit of confidence interval and assurance denoted by the probability of achieving that lower limit. We make use of the equivalence of the WinP and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and adapt a formula originally developed for the difference between two AUCs to handle the global WinP. Unequal variances between treatment groups are allowed. Simulation results suggest that the method performs very well. We illustrate the proposed formula using a Parkinson's disease clinical trial design example.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107665"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sample size planning for estimating the global win probability with precision and assurance\",\"authors\":\"Di Shu ,&nbsp;Guangyong Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Randomized controlled trials commonly employ multiple endpoints to collectively assess the intended effects of the new intervention on multiple aspects of the disease. Focusing on the estimation of the global win probability (WinP), defined as the (weighted) mean of the WinPs across the endpoints that a treated participant would have a better outcome than a control participant, we propose a closed-form sample size formula incorporating pre-specified precision and assurance, with precision denoted by the lower limit of confidence interval and assurance denoted by the probability of achieving that lower limit. We make use of the equivalence of the WinP and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and adapt a formula originally developed for the difference between two AUCs to handle the global WinP. Unequal variances between treatment groups are allowed. Simulation results suggest that the method performs very well. We illustrate the proposed formula using a Parkinson's disease clinical trial design example.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002489\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随机对照试验通常采用多个终点来综合评估新干预措施对疾病多个方面的预期效果。我们将重点放在全局获胜概率(WinP)的估算上,全局获胜概率定义为接受治疗的受试者比接受对照的受试者获得更好结果的各终点获胜概率的(加权)平均值,我们提出了一个包含预先指定的精确度和保证度的封闭式样本量计算公式,精确度用置信区间的下限表示,保证度用达到该下限的概率表示。我们利用 WinP 与接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)的等价性,并将最初为两个 AUC 之间的差值开发的公式调整用于处理全局 WinP。允许治疗组之间存在不等方差。模拟结果表明,该方法效果非常好。我们以帕金森病临床试验设计为例,对所提出的公式进行了说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sample size planning for estimating the global win probability with precision and assurance

Randomized controlled trials commonly employ multiple endpoints to collectively assess the intended effects of the new intervention on multiple aspects of the disease. Focusing on the estimation of the global win probability (WinP), defined as the (weighted) mean of the WinPs across the endpoints that a treated participant would have a better outcome than a control participant, we propose a closed-form sample size formula incorporating pre-specified precision and assurance, with precision denoted by the lower limit of confidence interval and assurance denoted by the probability of achieving that lower limit. We make use of the equivalence of the WinP and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and adapt a formula originally developed for the difference between two AUCs to handle the global WinP. Unequal variances between treatment groups are allowed. Simulation results suggest that the method performs very well. We illustrate the proposed formula using a Parkinson's disease clinical trial design example.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Integrative data analysis of clinical trials network studies to examine the impact of psychosocial treatments for Black people who use cocaine: Study protocol' [Contemporary Clinical Trials 133 (2023) 107329]. Increasing screening for breast cancer using a randomized evaluation of electronic health record nudges: Design and rationale of the I-screen clinical trial. An evaluation of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (CBT-AR) in a youth outpatient eating disorders service: A protocol paper. Characteristics of VA hospitals by participation status in a large pragmatic embedded clinical trial. Effect of donepezil on bone metabolism among older adults with Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1