使用 Chirp-ABR 测量听觉神经病谱系障碍和感音神经性听力损失儿童的阈值。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112074
Wenxia Chen , Yue Huang , Duan Bo, Ping Lu, Zhengmin Xu
{"title":"使用 Chirp-ABR 测量听觉神经病谱系障碍和感音神经性听力损失儿童的阈值。","authors":"Wenxia Chen ,&nbsp;Yue Huang ,&nbsp;Duan Bo,&nbsp;Ping Lu,&nbsp;Zhengmin Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study explored the value of Chirp-auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds in assessing the hearing threshold of children diagnosed with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 20 children with ANSD (40 ears, aged 1.5–7.0 years, median age 4.5 years) and 31 children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) (52 ears, aged 0.9–8.0 years, median age 3.7 years) were included. Besides, 25 normal children (50 ears, aged 0.8–7.5 years, median age 4.6 years) were used as controls. Chirp-ABR and behavioral audiometry were performed simultaneously among three groups of children, allowing for a comparison of the thresholds obtained through both methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In ANSD children, the correlation (r-values) between the thresholds obtained from Chirp-ABR and behavioral audiometry at 500–4000 Hz were 0.84, 0.67, 0.59, and 0.60, respectively. The average threshold differences between two methods ranged from 9.7 to 13.3 dB at 500–4000 Hz. Notably, 20 % ears (8/40) exhibited considerable discrepancies (&gt;30 dB) in thresholds at certain frequencies. For SNHL children, the r-values between two methods were 0.84, 0.89, 0.92, and 0.93, respectively. The average threshold differences between two methods were 5.7–8.2 dB at 500–4000 Hz. Similarly, in normal children, the average threshold differences between two methods ranged from 6.1 dB to 7.7 dB, the r-values were 0.81, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.80 at 500–4000 Hz, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Chirp-ABR threshold is not suitable to predict the behavioral audiometry threshold in ANSD children. When there is a significant discrepancy (&gt;30 dB) between Chirp-ABR thresholds and behavioral audiometry thresholds in hearing loss, ANSD should be highly suspected.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of thresholds using Chirp-ABR in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and sensorineural hearing loss\",\"authors\":\"Wenxia Chen ,&nbsp;Yue Huang ,&nbsp;Duan Bo,&nbsp;Ping Lu,&nbsp;Zhengmin Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study explored the value of Chirp-auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds in assessing the hearing threshold of children diagnosed with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 20 children with ANSD (40 ears, aged 1.5–7.0 years, median age 4.5 years) and 31 children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) (52 ears, aged 0.9–8.0 years, median age 3.7 years) were included. Besides, 25 normal children (50 ears, aged 0.8–7.5 years, median age 4.6 years) were used as controls. Chirp-ABR and behavioral audiometry were performed simultaneously among three groups of children, allowing for a comparison of the thresholds obtained through both methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In ANSD children, the correlation (r-values) between the thresholds obtained from Chirp-ABR and behavioral audiometry at 500–4000 Hz were 0.84, 0.67, 0.59, and 0.60, respectively. The average threshold differences between two methods ranged from 9.7 to 13.3 dB at 500–4000 Hz. Notably, 20 % ears (8/40) exhibited considerable discrepancies (&gt;30 dB) in thresholds at certain frequencies. For SNHL children, the r-values between two methods were 0.84, 0.89, 0.92, and 0.93, respectively. The average threshold differences between two methods were 5.7–8.2 dB at 500–4000 Hz. Similarly, in normal children, the average threshold differences between two methods ranged from 6.1 dB to 7.7 dB, the r-values were 0.81, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.80 at 500–4000 Hz, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Chirp-ABR threshold is not suitable to predict the behavioral audiometry threshold in ANSD children. When there is a significant discrepancy (&gt;30 dB) between Chirp-ABR thresholds and behavioral audiometry thresholds in hearing loss, ANSD should be highly suspected.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587624002283\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587624002283","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了Chirp-听觉脑干反应(ABR)阈值在评估听觉神经病谱系障碍(ANSD)儿童听力阈值方面的价值:共纳入 20 名听觉神经病谱系障碍(ANSD)儿童(40 耳,年龄 1.5-7.0 岁,中位年龄 4.5 岁)和 31 名感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)儿童(52 耳,年龄 0.9-8.0 岁,中位年龄 3.7 岁)。此外,25 名正常儿童(50 耳,年龄为 0.8-7.5 岁,中位年龄为 4.6 岁)作为对照。在三组儿童中同时进行 Chirp-ABR 和行为测听,以便对两种方法获得的阈值进行比较:在 ANSD 儿童中,通过 Chirp-ABR 和行为测听法获得的 500-4000 Hz 频率阈值之间的相关性(r 值)分别为 0.84、0.67、0.59 和 0.60。两种方法在 500-4000 Hz 频率下的平均阈值差异在 9.7 到 13.3 dB 之间。值得注意的是,有 20% 的耳朵(8/40)在某些频率上的阈值相差很大(>30 dB)。对于 SNHL 儿童,两种方法之间的 r 值分别为 0.84、0.89、0.92 和 0.93。在 500-4000 Hz 频率下,两种方法的平均阈值差为 5.7-8.2 dB。同样,在正常儿童中,两种方法的平均阈值差异为 6.1 分贝至 7.7 分贝,r 值在 500-4000 Hz 时分别为 0.81、0.78、0.80 和 0.80:结论:Chirp-ABR阈值并不适合预测ANSD儿童的行为测听阈值。结论:Chirp-ABR阈值并不适合预测ANSD儿童的行为测听阈值,当Chirp-ABR阈值与听力损失儿童的行为测听阈值存在明显差异(>30 dB)时,应高度怀疑ANSD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measurement of thresholds using Chirp-ABR in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and sensorineural hearing loss

Aim

This study explored the value of Chirp-auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds in assessing the hearing threshold of children diagnosed with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD).

Methods

A total of 20 children with ANSD (40 ears, aged 1.5–7.0 years, median age 4.5 years) and 31 children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) (52 ears, aged 0.9–8.0 years, median age 3.7 years) were included. Besides, 25 normal children (50 ears, aged 0.8–7.5 years, median age 4.6 years) were used as controls. Chirp-ABR and behavioral audiometry were performed simultaneously among three groups of children, allowing for a comparison of the thresholds obtained through both methods.

Results

In ANSD children, the correlation (r-values) between the thresholds obtained from Chirp-ABR and behavioral audiometry at 500–4000 Hz were 0.84, 0.67, 0.59, and 0.60, respectively. The average threshold differences between two methods ranged from 9.7 to 13.3 dB at 500–4000 Hz. Notably, 20 % ears (8/40) exhibited considerable discrepancies (>30 dB) in thresholds at certain frequencies. For SNHL children, the r-values between two methods were 0.84, 0.89, 0.92, and 0.93, respectively. The average threshold differences between two methods were 5.7–8.2 dB at 500–4000 Hz. Similarly, in normal children, the average threshold differences between two methods ranged from 6.1 dB to 7.7 dB, the r-values were 0.81, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.80 at 500–4000 Hz, respectively.

Conclusion

Chirp-ABR threshold is not suitable to predict the behavioral audiometry threshold in ANSD children. When there is a significant discrepancy (>30 dB) between Chirp-ABR thresholds and behavioral audiometry thresholds in hearing loss, ANSD should be highly suspected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families. Does Resilience Mediate the Relationship Between Negative Self-Image and Psychological Distress in Middle-Aged and Older Gay and Bisexual Men? Intergenerational Relations and Well-being Among Older Middle Eastern/Arab American Immigrants During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Caregiving Appraisals and Emotional Valence: Moderating Effects of Activity Participation. Heterogeneity of provider preferences for HIV Care Coordination Program features: latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1