共聚焦显微镜物镜放大倍数对牙齿微磨损纹理分析的比较分析。对毛冠鹿膳食重建的影响

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104716
{"title":"共聚焦显微镜物镜放大倍数对牙齿微磨损纹理分析的比较分析。对毛冠鹿膳食重建的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dental microwear texture analysis (DMTA) is a proxy used for characterising vertebrate palaeodiets in archaeological and palaeontological studies through the acquisition of 3D micro-texture height maps using confocal microscopy. Unlike previous techniques, DMTA is a quantitative method and enables reproducibility and repeatability. However, researchers working on DMTA have used different measurement equipment, softwares and microscopy objectives (magnification and numerical aperture). In the case of the objectives, DMTA widely uses 100x objective magnification, although successful applications at 20x and 50x have been reported. This study investigates the discriminative abilities at different magnifications, and discuss the advantages of each one. For this purpose, a set of 94 modern domestic and wild goats were analysed at 10x/0.30, 20x/0.45, 50x/0.80, and 100x/0.80. Our results demonstrate that all magnifications can discern between the seven groups of modern goats. However, 10x and 20x magnifications showed lower discrimination compared to 50x and 100x. Discriminant analyses revealed progressively refined distinctions at higher magnifications, with 100x yielding the best results. These findings support prior research suggesting the efficacy of 100x magnification in DMTA as the most optimal choice. However, it should be emphasised that high magnification and numerical aperture can present some limitations. Depending on the characteristics of the material studied and the microscope, an objective with lower magnification and numerical aperture may me more suitable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of confocal microscopy objective magnifications on dental microwear texture Analysis. Implications for dietary reconstruction in caprines\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Dental microwear texture analysis (DMTA) is a proxy used for characterising vertebrate palaeodiets in archaeological and palaeontological studies through the acquisition of 3D micro-texture height maps using confocal microscopy. Unlike previous techniques, DMTA is a quantitative method and enables reproducibility and repeatability. However, researchers working on DMTA have used different measurement equipment, softwares and microscopy objectives (magnification and numerical aperture). In the case of the objectives, DMTA widely uses 100x objective magnification, although successful applications at 20x and 50x have been reported. This study investigates the discriminative abilities at different magnifications, and discuss the advantages of each one. For this purpose, a set of 94 modern domestic and wild goats were analysed at 10x/0.30, 20x/0.45, 50x/0.80, and 100x/0.80. Our results demonstrate that all magnifications can discern between the seven groups of modern goats. However, 10x and 20x magnifications showed lower discrimination compared to 50x and 100x. Discriminant analyses revealed progressively refined distinctions at higher magnifications, with 100x yielding the best results. These findings support prior research suggesting the efficacy of 100x magnification in DMTA as the most optimal choice. However, it should be emphasised that high magnification and numerical aperture can present some limitations. Depending on the characteristics of the material studied and the microscope, an objective with lower magnification and numerical aperture may me more suitable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24003444\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24003444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙齿微磨损纹理分析(DMTA)是考古学和古生物学研究中用来描述脊椎动物古骨骼特征的一种替代方法,它通过共聚焦显微镜获取三维微纹理高度图。与以往的技术不同,DMTA 是一种定量方法,具有可重复性和可重复性。然而,研究 DMTA 的研究人员使用了不同的测量设备、软件和显微镜物镜(放大倍率和数值孔径)。在物镜方面,DMTA 广泛使用 100 倍物镜放大率,但也有报道称成功应用于 20 倍和 50 倍物镜。本研究调查了不同倍率下的分辨能力,并讨论了每种倍率的优势。为此,我们在 10x/0.30、20x/0.45、50x/0.80 和 100x/0.80 倍率下对 94 只现代家山羊和野山羊进行了分析。我们的结果表明,所有放大倍数都能区分七组现代山羊。然而,与 50x 和 100x 相比,10x 和 20x 放大镜的分辨能力较低。判别分析显示,放大倍数越高,区分度越高,其中 100 倍的结果最好。这些发现支持了之前的研究,即 100 倍放大镜在 DMTA 中的功效是最佳选择。不过,需要强调的是,高倍率和数值孔径会带来一些限制。根据所研究材料和显微镜的特性,放大倍率和数值孔径较低的物镜可能更适合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of confocal microscopy objective magnifications on dental microwear texture Analysis. Implications for dietary reconstruction in caprines

Dental microwear texture analysis (DMTA) is a proxy used for characterising vertebrate palaeodiets in archaeological and palaeontological studies through the acquisition of 3D micro-texture height maps using confocal microscopy. Unlike previous techniques, DMTA is a quantitative method and enables reproducibility and repeatability. However, researchers working on DMTA have used different measurement equipment, softwares and microscopy objectives (magnification and numerical aperture). In the case of the objectives, DMTA widely uses 100x objective magnification, although successful applications at 20x and 50x have been reported. This study investigates the discriminative abilities at different magnifications, and discuss the advantages of each one. For this purpose, a set of 94 modern domestic and wild goats were analysed at 10x/0.30, 20x/0.45, 50x/0.80, and 100x/0.80. Our results demonstrate that all magnifications can discern between the seven groups of modern goats. However, 10x and 20x magnifications showed lower discrimination compared to 50x and 100x. Discriminant analyses revealed progressively refined distinctions at higher magnifications, with 100x yielding the best results. These findings support prior research suggesting the efficacy of 100x magnification in DMTA as the most optimal choice. However, it should be emphasised that high magnification and numerical aperture can present some limitations. Depending on the characteristics of the material studied and the microscope, an objective with lower magnification and numerical aperture may me more suitable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
期刊最新文献
Finding historical linkages between India and Myanmar through archaeological and physicochemical analysis of ceramics c. 1st century BCE to 13th century CE What jewelry did people wear in the Middle Byzantine period (10th-12th C. CE) in the Peloponnese? A technological and analytical case study A metal hoard from Susz provides new evidence for the use of bast cordage during the Lusatian period in Poland Identifying construction technologies and environmental connections at the Iron Age IIA settlement of Kh. es-Suwweida, Israel: A microarchaeological study Human diet and social complexity during the middle and late Dawenkou period at the Jiaojia Site, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1