不同领域的社会支持和主观运动认知风险综合征的多轨迹:基于 16 年群体的多轨迹分析

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100334
{"title":"不同领域的社会支持和主观运动认知风险综合征的多轨迹:基于 16 年群体的多轨迹分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to examine the longitudinal relationships between the trajectories of distinct subtypes of various domains of social supports and risk of subjective motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Longitudinal cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting and participants</h3><p>2,279 participants in the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging (TLSA) between 1999 and 2011.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A group-based multi-trajectory modeling (GBMTM) was implemented to identify distinct trajectory subtypes within various social support domains, encompassing social networks, emotional support, instrumental support, as well as working and economic status. Logistic regression models were then utilized to evaluate the associations between these trajectory subtypes and the risk of subjective MCR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2,279 participants, GBMTM identified four distinct trajectory subtypes: \"low social support\" (n = 371), \"medium social support \" (n = 862), \"high social support\" (n = 292), and \"high social support with employment\" (n = 754). The incidence rates of subjective MCR for these groups were 9.4%, 9.0%, 4.1%, and 0.8%, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, education level, and comorbidities, both “low social support” (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.07, 95% CI [1.60–10.34]) and “medium social support” (aOR 3.10, 95% CI [1.26−7.66]) were significantly associated with an increased risk of subjective MCR compared to the \"high social support with employment\" group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><p>The current study demonstrates that social support significantly reduces the risk of subjective MCR, with lower support levels correlating to higher risk, necessitating further intervention studies to confirm the link between social support and risk of subjective MCR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1279770724004214/pdfft?md5=62e3c143437ec99eb033b2beab18ddd4&pid=1-s2.0-S1279770724004214-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-trajectories in different domains of social supports and subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome: a 16-year group-based multi-trajectory analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to examine the longitudinal relationships between the trajectories of distinct subtypes of various domains of social supports and risk of subjective motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Longitudinal cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting and participants</h3><p>2,279 participants in the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging (TLSA) between 1999 and 2011.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A group-based multi-trajectory modeling (GBMTM) was implemented to identify distinct trajectory subtypes within various social support domains, encompassing social networks, emotional support, instrumental support, as well as working and economic status. Logistic regression models were then utilized to evaluate the associations between these trajectory subtypes and the risk of subjective MCR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2,279 participants, GBMTM identified four distinct trajectory subtypes: \\\"low social support\\\" (n = 371), \\\"medium social support \\\" (n = 862), \\\"high social support\\\" (n = 292), and \\\"high social support with employment\\\" (n = 754). The incidence rates of subjective MCR for these groups were 9.4%, 9.0%, 4.1%, and 0.8%, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, education level, and comorbidities, both “low social support” (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.07, 95% CI [1.60–10.34]) and “medium social support” (aOR 3.10, 95% CI [1.26−7.66]) were significantly associated with an increased risk of subjective MCR compared to the \\\"high social support with employment\\\" group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><p>The current study demonstrates that social support significantly reduces the risk of subjective MCR, with lower support levels correlating to higher risk, necessitating further intervention studies to confirm the link between social support and risk of subjective MCR.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1279770724004214/pdfft?md5=62e3c143437ec99eb033b2beab18ddd4&pid=1-s2.0-S1279770724004214-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1279770724004214\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1279770724004214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在探讨不同社会支持领域的不同亚型的轨迹与主观运动性认知风险(MCR)综合征风险之间的纵向关系。方法采用基于群体的多轨迹建模(GBMTM)来识别不同社会支持领域内的不同轨迹亚型,包括社会网络、情感支持、工具支持以及工作和经济状况。结果在 2,279 名参与者中,GBMTM 确定了四种不同的轨迹亚型:"低社会支持"(371 人)、"中等社会支持"(862 人)、"高社会支持"(292 人)和 "高就业社会支持"(754 人)。这些组别的主观 MCR 发生率分别为 9.4%、9.0%、4.1% 和 0.8%。在对年龄、性别、教育水平和合并症进行调整后,与 "高就业社会支持 "组相比,"低社会支持 "组(调整后的几率比(aOR)为 4.07,95% CI [1.60-10.34])和 "中等社会支持 "组(aOR 为 3.10,95% CI [1.26-7.66])与主观 MCR 风险增加有显著相关性。结论与启示本研究表明,社会支持可显著降低主观MCR的风险,支持水平越低,风险越高,因此有必要开展进一步的干预研究,以证实社会支持与主观MCR风险之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-trajectories in different domains of social supports and subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome: a 16-year group-based multi-trajectory analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine the longitudinal relationships between the trajectories of distinct subtypes of various domains of social supports and risk of subjective motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome.

Design

Longitudinal cohort study.

Setting and participants

2,279 participants in the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging (TLSA) between 1999 and 2011.

Method

A group-based multi-trajectory modeling (GBMTM) was implemented to identify distinct trajectory subtypes within various social support domains, encompassing social networks, emotional support, instrumental support, as well as working and economic status. Logistic regression models were then utilized to evaluate the associations between these trajectory subtypes and the risk of subjective MCR.

Results

Among 2,279 participants, GBMTM identified four distinct trajectory subtypes: "low social support" (n = 371), "medium social support " (n = 862), "high social support" (n = 292), and "high social support with employment" (n = 754). The incidence rates of subjective MCR for these groups were 9.4%, 9.0%, 4.1%, and 0.8%, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, education level, and comorbidities, both “low social support” (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.07, 95% CI [1.60–10.34]) and “medium social support” (aOR 3.10, 95% CI [1.26−7.66]) were significantly associated with an increased risk of subjective MCR compared to the "high social support with employment" group.

Conclusions and implications

The current study demonstrates that social support significantly reduces the risk of subjective MCR, with lower support levels correlating to higher risk, necessitating further intervention studies to confirm the link between social support and risk of subjective MCR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: There is increasing scientific and clinical interest in the interactions of nutrition and health as part of the aging process. This interest is due to the important role that nutrition plays throughout the life span. This role affects the growth and development of the body during childhood, affects the risk of acute and chronic diseases, the maintenance of physiological processes and the biological process of aging. A major aim of "The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging" is to contribute to the improvement of knowledge regarding the relationships between nutrition and the aging process from birth to old age.
期刊最新文献
Mitochondrial pathways and sarcopenia in the geroscience era. The association between sarcopenic obesity and cardiometabolic multimorbidity in chinese middle-aged and older adults. Associations of three healthy dietary patterns with homeostatic dysregulation: results from the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort study The sweet escape: Are ketones a key player in unlocking healthy aging? Protein source associated with risk of metabolic syndrome in adults with low and adequate protein intake: A prospective cohort study of middle-aged and older adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1