Jonas Bartl , Denefa Bostandzic , Felix Irresberger , Gregor Weiß , Ruomei Yang
{"title":"2008 年卖空禁令对尾部风险的影响","authors":"Jonas Bartl , Denefa Bostandzic , Felix Irresberger , Gregor Weiß , Ruomei Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jempfin.2024.101532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examine how the 2008 U.S. short-selling ban on the stocks of financial institutions impacted their equity tail risk. Using propensity score matching and difference-in-difference regressions, we show that the ban was not effective in restoring financial stability as measured by the stocks’ dynamic Marginal Expected Shortfall. In contrast, especially large institutions, those who were most vulnerable to market downturns in the preban period, as well as those equities with associated put option contracts, experienced sharp increases in their exposure to market downturns during the ban period, contrary to regulators’ intentions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Finance","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539824000677/pdfft?md5=84fba35aebc9f925ab99427461c04e0b&pid=1-s2.0-S0927539824000677-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 2008 short-selling ban’s impact on tail risk\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Bartl , Denefa Bostandzic , Felix Irresberger , Gregor Weiß , Ruomei Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jempfin.2024.101532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We examine how the 2008 U.S. short-selling ban on the stocks of financial institutions impacted their equity tail risk. Using propensity score matching and difference-in-difference regressions, we show that the ban was not effective in restoring financial stability as measured by the stocks’ dynamic Marginal Expected Shortfall. In contrast, especially large institutions, those who were most vulnerable to market downturns in the preban period, as well as those equities with associated put option contracts, experienced sharp increases in their exposure to market downturns during the ban period, contrary to regulators’ intentions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Empirical Finance\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539824000677/pdfft?md5=84fba35aebc9f925ab99427461c04e0b&pid=1-s2.0-S0927539824000677-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Empirical Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539824000677\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539824000677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
We examine how the 2008 U.S. short-selling ban on the stocks of financial institutions impacted their equity tail risk. Using propensity score matching and difference-in-difference regressions, we show that the ban was not effective in restoring financial stability as measured by the stocks’ dynamic Marginal Expected Shortfall. In contrast, especially large institutions, those who were most vulnerable to market downturns in the preban period, as well as those equities with associated put option contracts, experienced sharp increases in their exposure to market downturns during the ban period, contrary to regulators’ intentions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Empirical Finance is a financial economics journal whose aim is to publish high quality articles in empirical finance. Empirical finance is interpreted broadly to include any type of empirical work in financial economics, financial econometrics, and also theoretical work with clear empirical implications, even when there is no empirical analysis. The Journal welcomes articles in all fields of finance, such as asset pricing, corporate finance, financial econometrics, banking, international finance, microstructure, behavioural finance, etc. The Editorial Team is willing to take risks on innovative research, controversial papers, and unusual approaches. We are also particularly interested in work produced by young scholars. The composition of the editorial board reflects such goals.