{"title":"在 316L 不锈钢激光粉末床熔化中使用浆料替代干粉","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addlet.2024.100230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a well-established additive manufacturing process for producing high-quality metal components with unparallelled design freedom. However, LPBF also has its limitations, including a limited materials palette, low productivity and high costs, mainly due to the expensive feedstock powders. These powders must meet highly stringent requirements regarding particle size (15–<span><math><mrow><mn>45</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>), particle size distribution (mono-modal) and morphology (spherical), which is achievable only through expensive gas- and plasma-atomised powders. This paper investigates slurry-LPBF as an alternative to conventional dry powder LPBF. The use of slurry removes some of the stringent powder requirements by allowing deposition of smaller particles with a variety of particle morphologies. Slurry-LPBF can therefore increase the useful yield of the atomisation process and expand the materials palette for LPBF, by enabling the use of powders for which atomised variants are not commercially available. This study used 316L stainless steel powder with an average particle size <span><math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>18</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>. An existing slurry-LPBF machine was re-designed and re-built, allowing successful slurry processing. Two optimal parameter sets were obtained, resulting in component density of 99.4%. Tensile testing revealed an ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 622 ± 2 MPa and an elongation at break of 66 ± 2%. These results are consistent, and fall within the range of reported values in literature for dry-powder LPBF, with the UTS being on the lower side of the range, whilst elongation at break being on the higher side.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72068,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000380/pdfft?md5=5e6b605faf1666b404a4bcade4865925&pid=1-s2.0-S2772369024000380-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the use of slurry as an alternative to dry powder for laser powder bed fusion of 316L stainless steel\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.addlet.2024.100230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a well-established additive manufacturing process for producing high-quality metal components with unparallelled design freedom. However, LPBF also has its limitations, including a limited materials palette, low productivity and high costs, mainly due to the expensive feedstock powders. These powders must meet highly stringent requirements regarding particle size (15–<span><math><mrow><mn>45</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>), particle size distribution (mono-modal) and morphology (spherical), which is achievable only through expensive gas- and plasma-atomised powders. This paper investigates slurry-LPBF as an alternative to conventional dry powder LPBF. The use of slurry removes some of the stringent powder requirements by allowing deposition of smaller particles with a variety of particle morphologies. Slurry-LPBF can therefore increase the useful yield of the atomisation process and expand the materials palette for LPBF, by enabling the use of powders for which atomised variants are not commercially available. This study used 316L stainless steel powder with an average particle size <span><math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>18</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>. An existing slurry-LPBF machine was re-designed and re-built, allowing successful slurry processing. Two optimal parameter sets were obtained, resulting in component density of 99.4%. Tensile testing revealed an ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 622 ± 2 MPa and an elongation at break of 66 ± 2%. These results are consistent, and fall within the range of reported values in literature for dry-powder LPBF, with the UTS being on the lower side of the range, whilst elongation at break being on the higher side.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Additive manufacturing letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000380/pdfft?md5=5e6b605faf1666b404a4bcade4865925&pid=1-s2.0-S2772369024000380-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Additive manufacturing letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369024000380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the use of slurry as an alternative to dry powder for laser powder bed fusion of 316L stainless steel
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a well-established additive manufacturing process for producing high-quality metal components with unparallelled design freedom. However, LPBF also has its limitations, including a limited materials palette, low productivity and high costs, mainly due to the expensive feedstock powders. These powders must meet highly stringent requirements regarding particle size (15–), particle size distribution (mono-modal) and morphology (spherical), which is achievable only through expensive gas- and plasma-atomised powders. This paper investigates slurry-LPBF as an alternative to conventional dry powder LPBF. The use of slurry removes some of the stringent powder requirements by allowing deposition of smaller particles with a variety of particle morphologies. Slurry-LPBF can therefore increase the useful yield of the atomisation process and expand the materials palette for LPBF, by enabling the use of powders for which atomised variants are not commercially available. This study used 316L stainless steel powder with an average particle size . An existing slurry-LPBF machine was re-designed and re-built, allowing successful slurry processing. Two optimal parameter sets were obtained, resulting in component density of 99.4%. Tensile testing revealed an ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 622 ± 2 MPa and an elongation at break of 66 ± 2%. These results are consistent, and fall within the range of reported values in literature for dry-powder LPBF, with the UTS being on the lower side of the range, whilst elongation at break being on the higher side.