税收是否与经济增长同步?比较面板数据估算器

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Modelling Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106867
Antoine Cornevin , Juan Sebastian Corrales , Juan Pablo Angel Mojica
{"title":"税收是否与经济增长同步?比较面板数据估算器","authors":"Antoine Cornevin ,&nbsp;Juan Sebastian Corrales ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Angel Mojica","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Determining how economic growth affects tax revenues is crucial for fiscal sustainability, economic stabilization, and policy design. The current literature on tax buoyancy presents contrasting estimates, highlighting the need for a systematic discussion of the trade-offs associated with different estimators. This paper provides new empirical evidence by reviewing a range of panel data estimators in a large sample of 172 countries from 1990 to 2019. We find evidence of lower estimates for tax responses to economic activity in the short term relative to previous literature, suggesting a limited automatic stabilization power of tax systems. The heterogeneity in our results within and across income groups underscores the importance of choosing the appropriate estimator. Our results remain broadly unchanged when we introduce new control variables to disentangle discretionary from automatic tax revenue variations, indicating that economic cycles do not significantly influence the timing of tax policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 106867"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324002244/pdfft?md5=7600c21e7bbbc1b28d608fb582e8b29f&pid=1-s2.0-S0264999324002244-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do tax revenues track economic growth? Comparing panel data estimators\",\"authors\":\"Antoine Cornevin ,&nbsp;Juan Sebastian Corrales ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Angel Mojica\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Determining how economic growth affects tax revenues is crucial for fiscal sustainability, economic stabilization, and policy design. The current literature on tax buoyancy presents contrasting estimates, highlighting the need for a systematic discussion of the trade-offs associated with different estimators. This paper provides new empirical evidence by reviewing a range of panel data estimators in a large sample of 172 countries from 1990 to 2019. We find evidence of lower estimates for tax responses to economic activity in the short term relative to previous literature, suggesting a limited automatic stabilization power of tax systems. The heterogeneity in our results within and across income groups underscores the importance of choosing the appropriate estimator. Our results remain broadly unchanged when we introduce new control variables to disentangle discretionary from automatic tax revenue variations, indicating that economic cycles do not significantly influence the timing of tax policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324002244/pdfft?md5=7600c21e7bbbc1b28d608fb582e8b29f&pid=1-s2.0-S0264999324002244-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324002244\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324002244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定经济增长如何影响税收对于财政可持续性、经济稳定和政策设计至关重要。目前有关税收浮力的文献提出了截然不同的估算方法,凸显了系统讨论不同估算方法相关权衡的必要性。本文通过回顾 1990 年至 2019 年 172 个国家大样本中的一系列面板数据估算器,提供了新的经验证据。与以往的文献相比,我们发现了短期内税收对经济活动的反应估计值较低的证据,这表明税收制度的自动稳定能力有限。我们在收入群体内部和收入群体之间得出的结果具有异质性,这凸显了选择适当估算工具的重要性。当我们引入新的控制变量来区分税收收入的自由变化和自动变化时,我们的结果大体保持不变,这表明经济周期并不会对税收政策的时机产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do tax revenues track economic growth? Comparing panel data estimators

Determining how economic growth affects tax revenues is crucial for fiscal sustainability, economic stabilization, and policy design. The current literature on tax buoyancy presents contrasting estimates, highlighting the need for a systematic discussion of the trade-offs associated with different estimators. This paper provides new empirical evidence by reviewing a range of panel data estimators in a large sample of 172 countries from 1990 to 2019. We find evidence of lower estimates for tax responses to economic activity in the short term relative to previous literature, suggesting a limited automatic stabilization power of tax systems. The heterogeneity in our results within and across income groups underscores the importance of choosing the appropriate estimator. Our results remain broadly unchanged when we introduce new control variables to disentangle discretionary from automatic tax revenue variations, indicating that economic cycles do not significantly influence the timing of tax policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The impact of central bank digital currency on macroeconomic dynamics: A DSGE analysis Monetary and macroprudential policies: How to Be green? A political-economy approach Climate pattern effects on global economic conditions Option listing and underlying commodity futures volatility in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1