{"title":"流行病、少数群体和偏见：区分知识与思想","authors":"M. Simões Mendes","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2024.100996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the sensible and dramatic moment that the world has faced with the pandemic provoked by the novel coronavirus, something is not novel – the ‘attack’ and the struggle for what is most precious: knowledge.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>It is a critical theoretical essay.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Throughout history, something most threatening had a direct or indirect relationship with what was most valuable (e.g., Socrates, Copernicus, among others). Evidently, the best resources of knowledge and approaches must be used to collaborate with the analysis of social domains regarding the Covid-19 pandemic. However, it is crucial to use different approaches so as not to foster the same harmful consequences.</p></div><div><h3>Perspectives</h3><p>Developing novel theoretical approaches does not dispense the ability and need to think.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100996"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pandemic, minorities, and prejudice: Distinguishing knowledge and thought\",\"authors\":\"M. Simões Mendes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2024.100996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the sensible and dramatic moment that the world has faced with the pandemic provoked by the novel coronavirus, something is not novel – the ‘attack’ and the struggle for what is most precious: knowledge.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>It is a critical theoretical essay.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Throughout history, something most threatening had a direct or indirect relationship with what was most valuable (e.g., Socrates, Copernicus, among others). Evidently, the best resources of knowledge and approaches must be used to collaborate with the analysis of social domains regarding the Covid-19 pandemic. However, it is crucial to use different approaches so as not to foster the same harmful consequences.</p></div><div><h3>Perspectives</h3><p>Developing novel theoretical approaches does not dispense the ability and need to think.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100996\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pandemic, minorities, and prejudice: Distinguishing knowledge and thought
Background
Despite the sensible and dramatic moment that the world has faced with the pandemic provoked by the novel coronavirus, something is not novel – the ‘attack’ and the struggle for what is most precious: knowledge.
Methodology
It is a critical theoretical essay.
Discussion
Throughout history, something most threatening had a direct or indirect relationship with what was most valuable (e.g., Socrates, Copernicus, among others). Evidently, the best resources of knowledge and approaches must be used to collaborate with the analysis of social domains regarding the Covid-19 pandemic. However, it is crucial to use different approaches so as not to foster the same harmful consequences.
Perspectives
Developing novel theoretical approaches does not dispense the ability and need to think.
期刊介绍：
This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
