调查虚拟随机临床试验注册中的种族和性别差异:BE ACTIVE 研究的启示

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.06.003
Michael P. Fortunato MD , Anthony Girard ScM , Samantha Coratti BA , David Farraday BA , Laurie Norton MA, MBE , Charles Rareshide MA , Jingsan Zhu MS, MBA , Neel Chokshi MD, MBA , Julia E. Szymczak PhD , Tamar Klaiman PhD , Louise B. Russell PhD , Dylan S. Small PhD , Mitesh S. Patel MD, MBA , Kevin G.M. Volpp MD, PhD , Alexander C. Fanaroff MD, MHS
{"title":"调查虚拟随机临床试验注册中的种族和性别差异:BE ACTIVE 研究的启示","authors":"Michael P. Fortunato MD ,&nbsp;Anthony Girard ScM ,&nbsp;Samantha Coratti BA ,&nbsp;David Farraday BA ,&nbsp;Laurie Norton MA, MBE ,&nbsp;Charles Rareshide MA ,&nbsp;Jingsan Zhu MS, MBA ,&nbsp;Neel Chokshi MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Julia E. Szymczak PhD ,&nbsp;Tamar Klaiman PhD ,&nbsp;Louise B. Russell PhD ,&nbsp;Dylan S. Small PhD ,&nbsp;Mitesh S. Patel MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Kevin G.M. Volpp MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexander C. Fanaroff MD, MHS","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) often suffer from a lack of representation from historically marginalized populations, and it is uncertain whether virtual RCTs (vRCTs) enhance representativeness or if elements of their consent and enrollment processes may instead contribute to underrepresentation of these groups. In this study, we aimed to identify disparities in enrollment demographics in a vRCT, the BE ACTIVE study, which recruited patients within a single health system. We discovered that the proportions of eligible patients who were randomized differed significantly by gender and race/ethnicity (men 1.2%, women 2.0%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001; White 1.8%, Black 1.3%, Hispanic 0.7%, Asian 0.9%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and compared with White patients, non-White patients were less likely to have a valid email address on file and were less likely to click on the email link to the study webpage and begin enrollment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"276 ","pages":"Pages 120-124"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating racial and gender disparities in virtual randomized clinical trial enrollment: Insights from the BE ACTIVE study\",\"authors\":\"Michael P. Fortunato MD ,&nbsp;Anthony Girard ScM ,&nbsp;Samantha Coratti BA ,&nbsp;David Farraday BA ,&nbsp;Laurie Norton MA, MBE ,&nbsp;Charles Rareshide MA ,&nbsp;Jingsan Zhu MS, MBA ,&nbsp;Neel Chokshi MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Julia E. Szymczak PhD ,&nbsp;Tamar Klaiman PhD ,&nbsp;Louise B. Russell PhD ,&nbsp;Dylan S. Small PhD ,&nbsp;Mitesh S. Patel MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Kevin G.M. Volpp MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexander C. Fanaroff MD, MHS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) often suffer from a lack of representation from historically marginalized populations, and it is uncertain whether virtual RCTs (vRCTs) enhance representativeness or if elements of their consent and enrollment processes may instead contribute to underrepresentation of these groups. In this study, we aimed to identify disparities in enrollment demographics in a vRCT, the BE ACTIVE study, which recruited patients within a single health system. We discovered that the proportions of eligible patients who were randomized differed significantly by gender and race/ethnicity (men 1.2%, women 2.0%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001; White 1.8%, Black 1.3%, Hispanic 0.7%, Asian 0.9%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and compared with White patients, non-White patients were less likely to have a valid email address on file and were less likely to click on the email link to the study webpage and begin enrollment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\"276 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 120-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324001583\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324001583","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随机临床试验(RCT)往往缺乏历史上被边缘化人群的代表性,目前还不确定虚拟 RCT(vRCT)是否能提高代表性,或者其同意和注册过程中的一些因素是否会导致这些群体的代表性不足。在本研究中,我们的目的是确定在一项虚拟 RCT(BE ACTIVE 研究)中注册人口统计学方面的差异,该研究在单一医疗系统内招募患者。我们发现,符合随机化条件的患者比例在性别和种族/民族方面存在显著差异(男性 1.2%,女性 2.0%,P <.001;白人 1.8%,黑人 1.3%,西班牙裔 0.7%,亚裔 0.9%;P <.001),与白人患者相比,非白人患者拥有有效电子邮件地址的可能性较低,点击电子邮件链接进入研究网页并开始注册的可能性也较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating racial and gender disparities in virtual randomized clinical trial enrollment: Insights from the BE ACTIVE study

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) often suffer from a lack of representation from historically marginalized populations, and it is uncertain whether virtual RCTs (vRCTs) enhance representativeness or if elements of their consent and enrollment processes may instead contribute to underrepresentation of these groups. In this study, we aimed to identify disparities in enrollment demographics in a vRCT, the BE ACTIVE study, which recruited patients within a single health system. We discovered that the proportions of eligible patients who were randomized differed significantly by gender and race/ethnicity (men 1.2%, women 2.0%, P < .001; White 1.8%, Black 1.3%, Hispanic 0.7%, Asian 0.9%; P < .001), and compared with White patients, non-White patients were less likely to have a valid email address on file and were less likely to click on the email link to the study webpage and begin enrollment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
Effect of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist and aspirin versus placebo on days alive and out of hospital: An analysis from AUGUSTUS. Chest pain and coronary artery disease in cardiac amyloidosis: Prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Changes in coverage, access, and health status among adults with cardiovascular disease after medicaid work requirements. Impact of Moderate or Severe Mitral and Tricuspid Valves Regurgitation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet therapy after Ischemic Stroke According to hsCRP Levels and CYP2C19 Genotype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1