{"title":"为了改进对新热带森林碳储量的估算,需要进行更直接的测量:以亚马逊西南部为例","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tropical forests play a critical role in the global carbon cycle, storing 40–55 % of terrestrial plant carbon and significantly contributing to primary productivity. However, uncertainties persist in estimating carbon stocks and fluxes, exhibiting variation across the Neotropics, Africa, and Asia tropical forest regions. Despite hosting some of the most densely sampled forests, significant uncertainties persist in biomass and forest carbon stock estimates in the Neotropics. Although the Southwestern Amazon (SWA) forests span over 20 million hectares, no specific biomass or above- and below-ground carbon model has been calibrated for this region thus far. In our study, we conducted direct forest inventories in the SWA to address the following question: Do the allometric patterns, biomass, and carbon stocks observed in the Southwestern Amazon differ from those found in other regions of the Amazon or Pantropical? Our research reveals substantial differences in water and carbon content, biomass stocks, above- and below-ground oven-dry biomass ratios, and allometric patterns between SWA forests and other Amazonian and Pantropical forests. We have demonstrated that these differences result in overestimations of forest biomass when applying allometric equations developed for other Amazonian and Pantropical regions to the open forests of Southwestern Amazonia. This overestimation can reach up to 37 % when using equations from the eastern Amazon, and between 26 % and 46 % depending on the applied Pantropical equation. The use of an inappropriate factor for the root-to-shoot ratio in the Southwestern Amazon (SWA) can lead to overestimates of belowground oven-dry biomass by up to 20 %. To reduce uncertainties related to estimates of forest carbon stock and flux in Neotropical forests, it is necessary to enhance the density of direct biomass measurements, particularly in southwestern Amazonia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To improve estimates of neotropical forest carbon stocks more direct measurements are needed: An example from the Southwestern Amazon\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Tropical forests play a critical role in the global carbon cycle, storing 40–55 % of terrestrial plant carbon and significantly contributing to primary productivity. However, uncertainties persist in estimating carbon stocks and fluxes, exhibiting variation across the Neotropics, Africa, and Asia tropical forest regions. Despite hosting some of the most densely sampled forests, significant uncertainties persist in biomass and forest carbon stock estimates in the Neotropics. Although the Southwestern Amazon (SWA) forests span over 20 million hectares, no specific biomass or above- and below-ground carbon model has been calibrated for this region thus far. In our study, we conducted direct forest inventories in the SWA to address the following question: Do the allometric patterns, biomass, and carbon stocks observed in the Southwestern Amazon differ from those found in other regions of the Amazon or Pantropical? Our research reveals substantial differences in water and carbon content, biomass stocks, above- and below-ground oven-dry biomass ratios, and allometric patterns between SWA forests and other Amazonian and Pantropical forests. We have demonstrated that these differences result in overestimations of forest biomass when applying allometric equations developed for other Amazonian and Pantropical regions to the open forests of Southwestern Amazonia. This overestimation can reach up to 37 % when using equations from the eastern Amazon, and between 26 % and 46 % depending on the applied Pantropical equation. The use of an inappropriate factor for the root-to-shoot ratio in the Southwestern Amazon (SWA) can lead to overestimates of belowground oven-dry biomass by up to 20 %. To reduce uncertainties related to estimates of forest carbon stock and flux in Neotropical forests, it is necessary to enhance the density of direct biomass measurements, particularly in southwestern Amazonia.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724005073\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724005073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
To improve estimates of neotropical forest carbon stocks more direct measurements are needed: An example from the Southwestern Amazon
Tropical forests play a critical role in the global carbon cycle, storing 40–55 % of terrestrial plant carbon and significantly contributing to primary productivity. However, uncertainties persist in estimating carbon stocks and fluxes, exhibiting variation across the Neotropics, Africa, and Asia tropical forest regions. Despite hosting some of the most densely sampled forests, significant uncertainties persist in biomass and forest carbon stock estimates in the Neotropics. Although the Southwestern Amazon (SWA) forests span over 20 million hectares, no specific biomass or above- and below-ground carbon model has been calibrated for this region thus far. In our study, we conducted direct forest inventories in the SWA to address the following question: Do the allometric patterns, biomass, and carbon stocks observed in the Southwestern Amazon differ from those found in other regions of the Amazon or Pantropical? Our research reveals substantial differences in water and carbon content, biomass stocks, above- and below-ground oven-dry biomass ratios, and allometric patterns between SWA forests and other Amazonian and Pantropical forests. We have demonstrated that these differences result in overestimations of forest biomass when applying allometric equations developed for other Amazonian and Pantropical regions to the open forests of Southwestern Amazonia. This overestimation can reach up to 37 % when using equations from the eastern Amazon, and between 26 % and 46 % depending on the applied Pantropical equation. The use of an inappropriate factor for the root-to-shoot ratio in the Southwestern Amazon (SWA) can lead to overestimates of belowground oven-dry biomass by up to 20 %. To reduce uncertainties related to estimates of forest carbon stock and flux in Neotropical forests, it is necessary to enhance the density of direct biomass measurements, particularly in southwestern Amazonia.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.