为农村生计促进森林共有:印度 Vidarbha 的克萨巴哈联合会案例

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103292
Gautam Prateek , Divya Gupta
{"title":"为农村生计促进森林共有:印度 Vidarbha 的克萨巴哈联合会案例","authors":"Gautam Prateek ,&nbsp;Divya Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article, we explore how “commoning” plays a pivotal role in the collaborative and democratic management of forests to promote sustainable rural livelihoods. Commoning entails the everyday practices and social relations that enable people to come together, share, and act collectively. While existing literature offers insights into the institutional designs that underpin long-term collaborative management systems, less is known about the process of commoning. We seek to address this gap by asking, what social practices and relational arrangements contribute to the commoning of forests? And, how do these social practices and relational arrangements influence the creation of governance mechanisms that support forest livelihoods? To tackle these questions, we analyze the case studies of forest collectives called <em>gram sabha</em> federations in the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra, India. Through our case studies, we demonstrate how social relationships facilitate key processes of experimentation, adaptation, autonomy, and inclusiveness. These processes enable collectives to explore innovative and unconventional networks to navigate uncertainties. Our findings reveal that by leveraging their social relations, communities enhance their autonomy while reducing their reliance on the traditional colonialist and capitalist practices of the state and the market. In doing so, they forge a path towards sustainable rural livelihoods grounded in collective empowerment and democratic decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 103292"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fostering forest commoning for rural livelihoods: Case of gram sabha federations in Vidarbha, India\",\"authors\":\"Gautam Prateek ,&nbsp;Divya Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this article, we explore how “commoning” plays a pivotal role in the collaborative and democratic management of forests to promote sustainable rural livelihoods. Commoning entails the everyday practices and social relations that enable people to come together, share, and act collectively. While existing literature offers insights into the institutional designs that underpin long-term collaborative management systems, less is known about the process of commoning. We seek to address this gap by asking, what social practices and relational arrangements contribute to the commoning of forests? And, how do these social practices and relational arrangements influence the creation of governance mechanisms that support forest livelihoods? To tackle these questions, we analyze the case studies of forest collectives called <em>gram sabha</em> federations in the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra, India. Through our case studies, we demonstrate how social relationships facilitate key processes of experimentation, adaptation, autonomy, and inclusiveness. These processes enable collectives to explore innovative and unconventional networks to navigate uncertainties. Our findings reveal that by leveraging their social relations, communities enhance their autonomy while reducing their reliance on the traditional colonialist and capitalist practices of the state and the market. In doing so, they forge a path towards sustainable rural livelihoods grounded in collective empowerment and democratic decision-making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124001461\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124001461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们将探讨 "共有 "如何在森林的合作与民主管理中发挥关键作用,以促进可持续的农村生计。共同化 "包含日常实践和社会关系,使人们能够聚集在一起,分享并采取集体行动。虽然现有文献对支撑长期合作管理系统的制度设计提供了见解,但对共同化的过程却知之甚少。我们试图通过以下问题来弥补这一空白:哪些社会实践和关系安排有助于森林的共同化?这些社会实践和关系安排如何影响支持森林生计的治理机制的建立?为了解决这些问题,我们分析了印度马哈拉施特拉邦维达尔巴地区名为 gram sabha 联合会的森林集体的案例研究。通过案例研究,我们展示了社会关系如何促进实验、适应、自治和包容等关键过程。这些过程使集体能够探索创新和非常规网络,以应对不确定性。我们的研究结果表明,通过利用社会关系,社区增强了自主性,同时减少了对国家和市场的传统殖民主义和资本主义做法的依赖。在此过程中,他们开辟了一条以集体赋权和民主决策为基础的可持续农村生计之路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fostering forest commoning for rural livelihoods: Case of gram sabha federations in Vidarbha, India

In this article, we explore how “commoning” plays a pivotal role in the collaborative and democratic management of forests to promote sustainable rural livelihoods. Commoning entails the everyday practices and social relations that enable people to come together, share, and act collectively. While existing literature offers insights into the institutional designs that underpin long-term collaborative management systems, less is known about the process of commoning. We seek to address this gap by asking, what social practices and relational arrangements contribute to the commoning of forests? And, how do these social practices and relational arrangements influence the creation of governance mechanisms that support forest livelihoods? To tackle these questions, we analyze the case studies of forest collectives called gram sabha federations in the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra, India. Through our case studies, we demonstrate how social relationships facilitate key processes of experimentation, adaptation, autonomy, and inclusiveness. These processes enable collectives to explore innovative and unconventional networks to navigate uncertainties. Our findings reveal that by leveraging their social relations, communities enhance their autonomy while reducing their reliance on the traditional colonialist and capitalist practices of the state and the market. In doing so, they forge a path towards sustainable rural livelihoods grounded in collective empowerment and democratic decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
The oil palm replanting imperative: Are smallholder farmers willing to participate? Reviewing factors that influence voluntary participation in conservation programs in Latin America Preliminary evidence of softwood shortage and hardwood availability in EU regions: A spatial analysis using the European Forest Industry Database How contracted tree farmers engage in and benefit from inclusive value chains: Evidence from Vietnam Outsourcing stumpage price uncertainty with American put option for active timber management1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1