{"title":"戒烟与当前吸烟对骨折风险的影响:马尼托巴省 BMD 登记处","authors":"Fatima Zarzour, William D. Leslie","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2024.101523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Current tobacco smoking is included in FRAX<sup>TM</sup> calculator for fracture risk assessment. It is unknown whether previous smoking increases the risk of fracture. The current analysis was performed to compare incident fracture risk associated with current smoking, smoking cessation and non-smoking. The study population comprised 18,115 individuals aged 40 years and older (mean age 68.8 years, 95.1% female) from a large clinical registry of DXA tests for the Province of Manitoba, Canada, with two consecutive visits (mean interval 4.4 years) where current smoking was recorded. Smokers (N=1620) were defined as those reporting current smoking at visit 2 (index date), non-smokers (N=15,942) as answering no to current smoking at both visits, and ex-smokers (N=553) as answering yes to current smoking at visit 1 but no at visit 2. Incident fractures were identified through healthcare data linkage. Compared with non-smokers, risk for any incident fracture (primary outcome) was significantly greater in current smokers (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.19-1.67 adjusted for age/sex; HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.44 full adjusted) and ex-smokers (HRs 1.56, 95% CI 1.19-2.024 and 1.42, 95% CI 1.09-1.86, respectively). Similar directions and magnitudes of effect were seen for incident major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures (secondary outcomes), with point estimates for ex-smokers that were close to current smokers. In summary, recent smoking cessation was associated with ongoing increased short-term fracture risk similar to current smoking. Larger studies are needed to better define the time course of fracture risk after smoking cessation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":"27 4","pages":"Article 101523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Smoking Cessation versus Current Smoking on Fracture Risk: The Manitoba BMD Registry\",\"authors\":\"Fatima Zarzour, William D. Leslie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocd.2024.101523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Current tobacco smoking is included in FRAX<sup>TM</sup> calculator for fracture risk assessment. It is unknown whether previous smoking increases the risk of fracture. The current analysis was performed to compare incident fracture risk associated with current smoking, smoking cessation and non-smoking. The study population comprised 18,115 individuals aged 40 years and older (mean age 68.8 years, 95.1% female) from a large clinical registry of DXA tests for the Province of Manitoba, Canada, with two consecutive visits (mean interval 4.4 years) where current smoking was recorded. Smokers (N=1620) were defined as those reporting current smoking at visit 2 (index date), non-smokers (N=15,942) as answering no to current smoking at both visits, and ex-smokers (N=553) as answering yes to current smoking at visit 1 but no at visit 2. Incident fractures were identified through healthcare data linkage. Compared with non-smokers, risk for any incident fracture (primary outcome) was significantly greater in current smokers (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.19-1.67 adjusted for age/sex; HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.44 full adjusted) and ex-smokers (HRs 1.56, 95% CI 1.19-2.024 and 1.42, 95% CI 1.09-1.86, respectively). Similar directions and magnitudes of effect were seen for incident major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures (secondary outcomes), with point estimates for ex-smokers that were close to current smokers. In summary, recent smoking cessation was associated with ongoing increased short-term fracture risk similar to current smoking. Larger studies are needed to better define the time course of fracture risk after smoking cessation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Densitometry\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Densitometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695024000581\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695024000581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
用于骨折风险评估的 FRAXTM 计算器中包括当前吸烟情况。目前尚不清楚以前吸烟是否会增加骨折风险。本次分析旨在比较与当前吸烟、戒烟和不吸烟相关的骨折风险。研究对象包括来自加拿大马尼托巴省 DXA 检测大型临床登记处的 18115 名 40 岁及以上的患者(平均年龄 68.8 岁,95.1% 为女性),其中有两次连续就诊(平均间隔 4.4 年)记录了当前吸烟情况。吸烟者(N=1620)是指在第2次就诊时(指标日期)报告目前正在吸烟者,非吸烟者(N=15942)是指在两次就诊时均回答目前不吸烟者,前吸烟者(N=553)是指在第1次就诊时回答目前正在吸烟但在第2次就诊时回答不吸烟者。事件性骨折通过医疗保健数据链接确定。与非吸烟者相比,当前吸烟者(经年龄/性别调整后,危险比 [HR] 为 1.41,95% CI 为 1.19-1.67;经全面调整后,HR 为 1.22,95% CI 为 1.03-1.44)和曾经吸烟者(HR 分别为 1.56,95% CI 为 1.19-2.024 和 1.42,95% CI 为 1.09-1.86)发生任何骨折(主要结果)的风险明显更高。对发生重大骨质疏松性骨折和髋部骨折(次要结局)的影响方向和程度相似,对戒烟者的点估计值与当前吸烟者接近。总之,近期戒烟与持续增加的短期骨折风险相关,与当前吸烟者相似。需要进行更大规模的研究,以更好地确定戒烟后骨折风险的时间过程。
The Effect of Smoking Cessation versus Current Smoking on Fracture Risk: The Manitoba BMD Registry
Current tobacco smoking is included in FRAXTM calculator for fracture risk assessment. It is unknown whether previous smoking increases the risk of fracture. The current analysis was performed to compare incident fracture risk associated with current smoking, smoking cessation and non-smoking. The study population comprised 18,115 individuals aged 40 years and older (mean age 68.8 years, 95.1% female) from a large clinical registry of DXA tests for the Province of Manitoba, Canada, with two consecutive visits (mean interval 4.4 years) where current smoking was recorded. Smokers (N=1620) were defined as those reporting current smoking at visit 2 (index date), non-smokers (N=15,942) as answering no to current smoking at both visits, and ex-smokers (N=553) as answering yes to current smoking at visit 1 but no at visit 2. Incident fractures were identified through healthcare data linkage. Compared with non-smokers, risk for any incident fracture (primary outcome) was significantly greater in current smokers (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.19-1.67 adjusted for age/sex; HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.44 full adjusted) and ex-smokers (HRs 1.56, 95% CI 1.19-2.024 and 1.42, 95% CI 1.09-1.86, respectively). Similar directions and magnitudes of effect were seen for incident major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures (secondary outcomes), with point estimates for ex-smokers that were close to current smokers. In summary, recent smoking cessation was associated with ongoing increased short-term fracture risk similar to current smoking. Larger studies are needed to better define the time course of fracture risk after smoking cessation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics.
Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.