Comparison of range of motion between 2-year clinical outcomes and predictions of a static scapula preoperative planning software for reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Preoperative planning has gained popularity in the management of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Commercially available software provides 3-dimensional segmentation of scapula and humerus, as well as providing arc of motion for the implanted articulation and identifying potential areas of bony impingement. However, these software algorithms use a fixed scapula model, disregarding the preoperative clinical range of motion (C-ROM) of the patient, be it glenohumeral or scapulothoracic, as well as any soft tissue parameters. This study aims to compare the ROM based on preoperative planning software by using the implant position from postoperative computed tomography (CT) images (predicted ROM using preoperative planning software [P-ROM]), with the C-ROM assessed at minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

Methods

Preoperative and postoperative CT scans of 46 patients who underwent primary RSA between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed. At the postoperative 2-year review, each patient was assessed for active ROM. Implant size and position based on operative notes and postoperative CT scans were used to replicate the performed surgery in the planning software. Abduction, flexion, and external rotation motion were simulated and recorded. The relationship between C-ROM and P-ROM was investigated using linear regression analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient, and paired t-test.

Results

P-ROM was significantly lower than C-ROM at 2 years postoperatively (P < .001), with an average discrepancy of 78° in abduction, 47° in flexion, and 37° in external rotation (C-ROM: abduction 155° ± 21° [80°-180°]; flexion 160° ± 17° [90°-180°]; external rotation 52° ± 14° [10°-80°] vs. P-ROM: abduction 77° ± 13° [53°-107°]; flexion 112° ± 25° [67°-180°]; external rotation 15° ± 21° [0°-79°]). The linear regression analysis indicated weak agreement between C-ROM and P-ROM (abduction R² = 0.03; flexion R² = 0.01; external rotation R² = 0.04). Pearson’s correlation coefficients revealed weak correlations of −0.18, 0.03, and 0.21 for abduction, flexion, and external rotation, respectively.

Conclusion

P-ROM based on preoperative software in its current form does not allow the prediction of the C-ROM at 2 years of follow-up for patients undergoing RSA.