停止拖延,开始翻新!探索家庭节能改造的决策过程

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103734
{"title":"停止拖延,开始翻新!探索家庭节能改造的决策过程","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A tricky contributor to the “energy efficiency gap” is homeowners who fail to finalize a planned Energy Efficiency Renovation (EER) project, even after having received an offer from a contractor. However, there is a lack of evidence on drivers and barriers of homeowners' EER in the <em>final</em> stage of the decision process, including the role of the energy consultation and homeowners' perceptions of barriers and impediments that can potentially lead to procrastination, that is, to the postponement of tasks. This study contributes to filling this gap based on a survey of 609 Danish homeowners in the final stage of an EER decision-making processes. Through a comparative analysis of adopters and non-adopters, we find that procrastination is a common reason for non-adoption. First, we identify potential predictors that differ between adopters and non-adopters. Next, these variables are included in a structural equation path model (SEM) to estimate their direct and indirect effects on EER adoption. We find that homeowners' final implementation of EER decisions is complex and far from a simple weighing of monetary costs and benefits. Psychological factors such as expected hassle and interpersonal aspects of the consultation, as well as perceived difficulties and impediments, specifically related to how easy an EER offer is to understand and ultimately accept, are identified as core antecedents of EER adoption or procrastination. Implications for interventions to reduce procrastination in EER decisions are discussed, including financial support measures and interventions designed to make it easier for homeowners to implement their EER decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003256/pdfft?md5=c7ff1d778180f428cabfd6c111c67318&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624003256-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stop procrastinating, start renovating! Exploring the decision-making process for household energy efficiency renovations\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A tricky contributor to the “energy efficiency gap” is homeowners who fail to finalize a planned Energy Efficiency Renovation (EER) project, even after having received an offer from a contractor. However, there is a lack of evidence on drivers and barriers of homeowners' EER in the <em>final</em> stage of the decision process, including the role of the energy consultation and homeowners' perceptions of barriers and impediments that can potentially lead to procrastination, that is, to the postponement of tasks. This study contributes to filling this gap based on a survey of 609 Danish homeowners in the final stage of an EER decision-making processes. Through a comparative analysis of adopters and non-adopters, we find that procrastination is a common reason for non-adoption. First, we identify potential predictors that differ between adopters and non-adopters. Next, these variables are included in a structural equation path model (SEM) to estimate their direct and indirect effects on EER adoption. We find that homeowners' final implementation of EER decisions is complex and far from a simple weighing of monetary costs and benefits. Psychological factors such as expected hassle and interpersonal aspects of the consultation, as well as perceived difficulties and impediments, specifically related to how easy an EER offer is to understand and ultimately accept, are identified as core antecedents of EER adoption or procrastination. Implications for interventions to reduce procrastination in EER decisions are discussed, including financial support measures and interventions designed to make it easier for homeowners to implement their EER decisions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003256/pdfft?md5=c7ff1d778180f428cabfd6c111c67318&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624003256-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003256\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

造成 "能效差距 "的一个棘手因素是,业主在收到承包商的报价后,仍未能最终确定计划中的能效改造(EER)项目。然而,目前还缺乏有关房主在决策过程的最后阶段进行节能改造的动力和障碍的证据,包括能源咨询的作用以及房主对可能导致拖延(即推迟任务)的障碍和阻碍的看法。本研究通过对处于 EER 决策过程最后阶段的 609 位丹麦房主进行调查,填补了这一空白。通过对采用者和未采用者的对比分析,我们发现拖延是未采用的一个常见原因。首先,我们确定了采用者和未采用者之间存在差异的潜在预测因素。然后,将这些变量纳入结构方程路径模型(SEM),估算它们对采用 EER 的直接和间接影响。我们发现,房主最终实施 EER 的决定是复杂的,远非货币成本和收益的简单权衡。心理因素,如预期的麻烦和咨询的人际关系方面,以及感知到的困难和障碍,特别是与 EER 提议是否容易理解和最终接受有关的因素,被认为是采用或拖延 EER 的核心前因。研究还讨论了为减少在做出能源效率评估决定时的拖延而采取干预措施的意义,包括旨在使业主更容易做出能源效率评估决定的财政支持措施和干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stop procrastinating, start renovating! Exploring the decision-making process for household energy efficiency renovations

A tricky contributor to the “energy efficiency gap” is homeowners who fail to finalize a planned Energy Efficiency Renovation (EER) project, even after having received an offer from a contractor. However, there is a lack of evidence on drivers and barriers of homeowners' EER in the final stage of the decision process, including the role of the energy consultation and homeowners' perceptions of barriers and impediments that can potentially lead to procrastination, that is, to the postponement of tasks. This study contributes to filling this gap based on a survey of 609 Danish homeowners in the final stage of an EER decision-making processes. Through a comparative analysis of adopters and non-adopters, we find that procrastination is a common reason for non-adoption. First, we identify potential predictors that differ between adopters and non-adopters. Next, these variables are included in a structural equation path model (SEM) to estimate their direct and indirect effects on EER adoption. We find that homeowners' final implementation of EER decisions is complex and far from a simple weighing of monetary costs and benefits. Psychological factors such as expected hassle and interpersonal aspects of the consultation, as well as perceived difficulties and impediments, specifically related to how easy an EER offer is to understand and ultimately accept, are identified as core antecedents of EER adoption or procrastination. Implications for interventions to reduce procrastination in EER decisions are discussed, including financial support measures and interventions designed to make it easier for homeowners to implement their EER decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Juggling the basics: How much does an income increase affect energy spending of low-income households in England? The informality-energy innovation-finance nexus: Sustainable business models for microgrid-based off-grid urban energy access The future of fossil fuels, chemicals, and feedstocks: Outlining a research agenda on the role of China in the global petrochemical industry Green hydrogen transitions deepen socioecological risks and extractivist patterns: evidence from 28 prospective exporting countries in the Global South Unpacking travel needs and experiences: Insights from qualitative interviews with affordable housing residents in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1