重新审视团队成员性格与团队绩效之间的关系:荟萃分析

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104526
Areum Han , Florian Krieger , Sungwon Kim , Nia Nixon , Samuel Greiff
{"title":"重新审视团队成员性格与团队绩效之间的关系:荟萃分析","authors":"Areum Han ,&nbsp;Florian Krieger ,&nbsp;Sungwon Kim ,&nbsp;Nia Nixon ,&nbsp;Samuel Greiff","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The relationships between team members’ personality traits and their team’s performance have been studied for decades, yet the relationships remain unclear. The field has evolved as new assessments of team performance and novel insights from empirical studies are introduced. Furthermore, collaboration and team-relevant topics have been spotlighted by policymakers and stakeholders. Thus, new systematic investigations into such relationships are needed. Accordingly, we sought to fill these gaps and produce more integrative results by updating and extending earlier <em>meta</em>-analyses by exploring several moderators. We focused on task performance and the means and standard deviations of team members’ Big Five personality traits. The results revealed that several team personality traits were weakly related to team performance and key moderators influenced the relationships.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 104526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the relationship between team members’ personality and their team’s performance: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Areum Han ,&nbsp;Florian Krieger ,&nbsp;Sungwon Kim ,&nbsp;Nia Nixon ,&nbsp;Samuel Greiff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The relationships between team members’ personality traits and their team’s performance have been studied for decades, yet the relationships remain unclear. The field has evolved as new assessments of team performance and novel insights from empirical studies are introduced. Furthermore, collaboration and team-relevant topics have been spotlighted by policymakers and stakeholders. Thus, new systematic investigations into such relationships are needed. Accordingly, we sought to fill these gaps and produce more integrative results by updating and extending earlier <em>meta</em>-analyses by exploring several moderators. We focused on task performance and the means and standard deviations of team members’ Big Five personality traits. The results revealed that several team personality traits were weakly related to team performance and key moderators influenced the relationships.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000746\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,人们一直在研究团队成员的个性特征与团队绩效之间的关系,但两者之间的关系仍不明确。随着对团队绩效的新评估和来自实证研究的新见解的引入,这一领域也在不断发展。此外,与协作和团队相关的主题也受到了政策制定者和利益相关者的关注。因此,需要对这些关系进行新的系统调查。因此,我们试图通过更新和扩展之前的荟萃分析,探索几种调节因素,从而填补这些空白,得出更具综合性的结果。我们重点研究了任务绩效以及团队成员的五大人格特质的平均值和标准偏差。结果表明,几种团队人格特质与团队绩效的关系较弱,而关键的调节因素会影响两者之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting the relationship between team members’ personality and their team’s performance: A meta-analysis

The relationships between team members’ personality traits and their team’s performance have been studied for decades, yet the relationships remain unclear. The field has evolved as new assessments of team performance and novel insights from empirical studies are introduced. Furthermore, collaboration and team-relevant topics have been spotlighted by policymakers and stakeholders. Thus, new systematic investigations into such relationships are needed. Accordingly, we sought to fill these gaps and produce more integrative results by updating and extending earlier meta-analyses by exploring several moderators. We focused on task performance and the means and standard deviations of team members’ Big Five personality traits. The results revealed that several team personality traits were weakly related to team performance and key moderators influenced the relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
期刊最新文献
Why does Creativity Foster Well-Being? Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness during Everyday Creative Activities Comparability of personality facets between men and women: A test of measurement invariance in IPIP-NEO facets in 49 countries The dynamic relationship between state extraversion and the subjectively perceived situational sociality in continuous time “High empathic response but low interest”: Machiavellianism and its neurostructural basis relate to perceived risk of social exclusion and workplace deviance Incremental relations between self-understanding and social functioning beyond personality traits in young adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1