开发和应用基于 RPA 的快速护理点检测 (POCT) 方法来检测猫白细胞减少症病毒

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Transboundary and Emerging Diseases Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1155/2024/3680778
Liang Hong, Qian Huang, Yuhang Zhou, Qi Zheng, Shipeng Wang, Fangfang Chen, Xinyue Chang, Guosheng Jiang, Lisha Zha
{"title":"开发和应用基于 RPA 的快速护理点检测 (POCT) 方法来检测猫白细胞减少症病毒","authors":"Liang Hong,&nbsp;Qian Huang,&nbsp;Yuhang Zhou,&nbsp;Qi Zheng,&nbsp;Shipeng Wang,&nbsp;Fangfang Chen,&nbsp;Xinyue Chang,&nbsp;Guosheng Jiang,&nbsp;Lisha Zha","doi":"10.1155/2024/3680778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Feline panleukopenia (FP) is a highly prevalent and consequential disease that poses a substantial threat to both adult and juvenile cats across all geographical regions. The causative agent responsible for this disease is the feline panleukopenia virus (FPV). Therefore, it is imperative to develop a facile, efficient, and accurate detection method for FPV. Hence, a recombinase polymerase amplification–lateral flow dipstick assay (RPA–LFDA) method was specifically designed for the detection of FPV. The amplification process was optimized. This investigation focused on evaluating the expansion temperature detection system and revealed an optimal reaction temperature of 39°C. Then, primer combination screening involving nine groups identified F3R2 as the most effective primer set, while dilution ratio experiments determined that a 10-fold dilution yielded the best amplification products. Our findings demonstrated that the RPA-LFDA assay had an analytical sensitivity that was capable of detecting as low as 10 target copies per reaction. Furthermore, cross-reactivity tests demonstrated no interference between feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1) and feline calicivirus (FCV). To validate our newly developed method against existing techniques in clinical samples from three common sources on the market, we observed superior sensitivity and specificity compared to those of the colloidal gold method (CGM), with a higher positive detection rate using our nucleic acid detection system than CGM. Compared to qPCR as a reference standard, RPA-LFDA detected 39 out of 44 positive samples (including one false positive), whereas CGM detected 26 out of 44 positive samples. Based on the RPA-LFDA, the sensitivity was calculated to be 100%, the specificity was 83.33%, the mistake diagnostic rate was 16.67%, the omission diagnostic rate was 0%, and the overall accuracy reached 97.73%. Moreover, the positive coincidence rate was 97.44%, while the negative coincidence rate reached 100%. The agreement <i>κ</i> value was 0.8962. In conclusion, this approach exhibits greater sensitivity than CGM and offers greater convenience and cost-effectiveness than the qPCR methodology, making it a viable option for the clinical detection of FPV.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/3680778","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Application of an RPA-Based Rapid Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) Method for the Detection of Feline Panleukopenia Virus\",\"authors\":\"Liang Hong,&nbsp;Qian Huang,&nbsp;Yuhang Zhou,&nbsp;Qi Zheng,&nbsp;Shipeng Wang,&nbsp;Fangfang Chen,&nbsp;Xinyue Chang,&nbsp;Guosheng Jiang,&nbsp;Lisha Zha\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/3680778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Feline panleukopenia (FP) is a highly prevalent and consequential disease that poses a substantial threat to both adult and juvenile cats across all geographical regions. The causative agent responsible for this disease is the feline panleukopenia virus (FPV). Therefore, it is imperative to develop a facile, efficient, and accurate detection method for FPV. Hence, a recombinase polymerase amplification–lateral flow dipstick assay (RPA–LFDA) method was specifically designed for the detection of FPV. The amplification process was optimized. This investigation focused on evaluating the expansion temperature detection system and revealed an optimal reaction temperature of 39°C. Then, primer combination screening involving nine groups identified F3R2 as the most effective primer set, while dilution ratio experiments determined that a 10-fold dilution yielded the best amplification products. Our findings demonstrated that the RPA-LFDA assay had an analytical sensitivity that was capable of detecting as low as 10 target copies per reaction. Furthermore, cross-reactivity tests demonstrated no interference between feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1) and feline calicivirus (FCV). To validate our newly developed method against existing techniques in clinical samples from three common sources on the market, we observed superior sensitivity and specificity compared to those of the colloidal gold method (CGM), with a higher positive detection rate using our nucleic acid detection system than CGM. Compared to qPCR as a reference standard, RPA-LFDA detected 39 out of 44 positive samples (including one false positive), whereas CGM detected 26 out of 44 positive samples. Based on the RPA-LFDA, the sensitivity was calculated to be 100%, the specificity was 83.33%, the mistake diagnostic rate was 16.67%, the omission diagnostic rate was 0%, and the overall accuracy reached 97.73%. Moreover, the positive coincidence rate was 97.44%, while the negative coincidence rate reached 100%. The agreement <i>κ</i> value was 0.8962. In conclusion, this approach exhibits greater sensitivity than CGM and offers greater convenience and cost-effectiveness than the qPCR methodology, making it a viable option for the clinical detection of FPV.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/3680778\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/3680778\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/3680778","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

猫泛白细胞减少症(FP)是一种发病率高、后果严重的疾病,对所有地区的成年猫和幼猫都构成了巨大威胁。这种疾病的病原体是猫泛白细胞减少症病毒(FPV)。因此,开发一种简便、高效、准确的 FPV 检测方法势在必行。因此,我们专门设计了一种重组酶聚合酶扩增-侧流滴定法(RPA-LFDA)来检测 FPV。对扩增过程进行了优化。这项研究重点评估了扩增温度检测系统,发现最佳反应温度为 39°C。然后,对九组引物组合进行筛选,确定 F3R2 为最有效的引物组,而稀释比实验则确定 10 倍稀释可产生最佳扩增产物。我们的研究结果表明,RPA-LFDA 检测法的分析灵敏度能够检测到低至每个反应 10 个目标拷贝。此外,交叉反应测试表明,猫疱疹病毒-1(FHV-1)和猫犊牛病毒(FCV)之间没有干扰。在市场上三种常见来源的临床样本中,我们用新开发的方法与现有技术进行了验证,结果表明,与胶体金法(CGM)相比,我们的方法具有更高的灵敏度和特异性,与胶体金法相比,我们的核酸检测系统具有更高的阳性检出率。与作为参考标准的 qPCR 相比,RPA-LFDA 检测出了 44 个阳性样本中的 39 个(包括一个假阳性),而 CGM 检测出了 44 个阳性样本中的 26 个。根据 RPA-LFDA 计算,灵敏度为 100%,特异性为 83.33%,误诊率为 16.67%,漏诊率为 0%,总体准确率达到 97.73%。此外,阳性吻合率为 97.44%,阴性吻合率为 100%。一致性κ值为 0.8962。总之,这种方法比 CGM 更灵敏,比 qPCR 方法更方便、更经济,是临床检测 FPV 的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Application of an RPA-Based Rapid Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) Method for the Detection of Feline Panleukopenia Virus

Feline panleukopenia (FP) is a highly prevalent and consequential disease that poses a substantial threat to both adult and juvenile cats across all geographical regions. The causative agent responsible for this disease is the feline panleukopenia virus (FPV). Therefore, it is imperative to develop a facile, efficient, and accurate detection method for FPV. Hence, a recombinase polymerase amplification–lateral flow dipstick assay (RPA–LFDA) method was specifically designed for the detection of FPV. The amplification process was optimized. This investigation focused on evaluating the expansion temperature detection system and revealed an optimal reaction temperature of 39°C. Then, primer combination screening involving nine groups identified F3R2 as the most effective primer set, while dilution ratio experiments determined that a 10-fold dilution yielded the best amplification products. Our findings demonstrated that the RPA-LFDA assay had an analytical sensitivity that was capable of detecting as low as 10 target copies per reaction. Furthermore, cross-reactivity tests demonstrated no interference between feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1) and feline calicivirus (FCV). To validate our newly developed method against existing techniques in clinical samples from three common sources on the market, we observed superior sensitivity and specificity compared to those of the colloidal gold method (CGM), with a higher positive detection rate using our nucleic acid detection system than CGM. Compared to qPCR as a reference standard, RPA-LFDA detected 39 out of 44 positive samples (including one false positive), whereas CGM detected 26 out of 44 positive samples. Based on the RPA-LFDA, the sensitivity was calculated to be 100%, the specificity was 83.33%, the mistake diagnostic rate was 16.67%, the omission diagnostic rate was 0%, and the overall accuracy reached 97.73%. Moreover, the positive coincidence rate was 97.44%, while the negative coincidence rate reached 100%. The agreement κ value was 0.8962. In conclusion, this approach exhibits greater sensitivity than CGM and offers greater convenience and cost-effectiveness than the qPCR methodology, making it a viable option for the clinical detection of FPV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 农林科学-传染病学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
350
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions): Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread. Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope. Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies. Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies). Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Prevalence Estimation and Phylogenetic Analysis of Novel Porcine Parvoviruses (PPV2–7) in Hungarian Pig Herds A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Biosecurity in Disease Prevention and Control in Livestock Farms in Africa Methods to Estimate the Between-Population Level Effective Reproductive Number for Infectious Disease Epidemics: Foot-And-Mouth Disease (FMD) in Vietnam Isolation and Genomic Characteristics of a Novel Pathogenicity Type I Feline Coronavirus in Mainland China Molecular and In Vivo Characterization of the High Pathogenicity H7N6 Avian Influenza Virus That Emerged in South African Poultry in 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1