Sonya M Kothadia, Eric E Cober, Christine E Koval, Jem M Golbin, Susan Harrington, Cyndee Miranda, Lauryn A Benninger, Jona M Banzon
{"title":"移植前感染了复合分枝杆菌的肺移植受者的临床疗效。","authors":"Sonya M Kothadia, Eric E Cober, Christine E Koval, Jem M Golbin, Susan Harrington, Cyndee Miranda, Lauryn A Benninger, Jona M Banzon","doi":"10.1111/tid.14361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are at risk for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections, in part due to the presence of structural lung disease pre-transplant and relatively higher levels of immunosuppression post-transplant. There is a lack of data regarding outcomes of LTR with MAC infections pre-transplant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who received lung transplants (LTs) from 2013 to 2020 with 1) evidence of MAC on culture or polymerase chain reaction before or at the time of transplant or 2) granulomas on explant pathology and positive acid-fast bacillus stains with no other mycobacteria identified. Patients were deemed to have MAC pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) if they met the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients (14/882, 2%) met inclusion criteria. Seven patients (7/14, 50%) had pre-transplant MAC-PD, four of whom had cavitary disease. None of the 14 patients had smear-positive cultures at the time of transplant. Two patients in our cohort received treatment for MAC before transplant. Thirteen patients were bilateral LTR (13/14, 93%). One single LTR was the sole patient to receive MAC treatment post-transplant. No patients developed MAC-PD after transplant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bilateral LTR in our cohort did not develop MAC-PD despite not receiving MAC treatment post-transplant. It is possible source control was achieved with native lung explantation. Our observations suggest patients may not uniformly require pre- or post-transplant MAC treatment if they are smear-negative and undergo bilateral LT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of lung transplant recipients with pre-transplant Mycobacterium avium complex infection.\",\"authors\":\"Sonya M Kothadia, Eric E Cober, Christine E Koval, Jem M Golbin, Susan Harrington, Cyndee Miranda, Lauryn A Benninger, Jona M Banzon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.14361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are at risk for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections, in part due to the presence of structural lung disease pre-transplant and relatively higher levels of immunosuppression post-transplant. There is a lack of data regarding outcomes of LTR with MAC infections pre-transplant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who received lung transplants (LTs) from 2013 to 2020 with 1) evidence of MAC on culture or polymerase chain reaction before or at the time of transplant or 2) granulomas on explant pathology and positive acid-fast bacillus stains with no other mycobacteria identified. Patients were deemed to have MAC pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) if they met the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients (14/882, 2%) met inclusion criteria. Seven patients (7/14, 50%) had pre-transplant MAC-PD, four of whom had cavitary disease. None of the 14 patients had smear-positive cultures at the time of transplant. Two patients in our cohort received treatment for MAC before transplant. Thirteen patients were bilateral LTR (13/14, 93%). One single LTR was the sole patient to receive MAC treatment post-transplant. No patients developed MAC-PD after transplant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bilateral LTR in our cohort did not develop MAC-PD despite not receiving MAC treatment post-transplant. It is possible source control was achieved with native lung explantation. Our observations suggest patients may not uniformly require pre- or post-transplant MAC treatment if they are smear-negative and undergo bilateral LT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14361\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肺移植受者(LTR)有感染复合分枝杆菌(MAC)的风险,部分原因是移植前存在结构性肺部疾病,而移植后的免疫抑制水平相对较高。目前还缺乏有关移植前感染 MAC 的 LTR 结果的数据:这是一项单中心回顾性分析,研究对象是 2013 年至 2020 年接受肺移植(LT)的患者,这些患者 1) 在移植前或移植时经培养或聚合酶链反应证实感染了 MAC;或 2) 在移植后病理检查中发现肉芽肿,酸性耐酸杆菌染色阳性,但未发现其他分枝杆菌。如果患者符合美国胸科学会/美国传染病学会的标准,则被视为患有 MAC 肺病(MAC-PD):14名患者(14/882,2%)符合纳入标准。七名患者(7/14,50%)在移植前患有 MAC-PD,其中四人患有腔隙性疾病。14名患者中没有一人在移植时涂片培养呈阳性。我们的队列中有两名患者在移植前接受了 MAC 治疗。13例患者为双侧LTR(13/14,93%)。只有一名单侧 LTR 患者在移植后接受了 MAC 治疗。没有患者在移植后出现 MAC-PD:结论:尽管移植后未接受 MAC 治疗,但我们队列中的双侧 LTR 患者并未发展为 MAC-PD。可能是通过原肺移植实现了源头控制。我们的观察结果表明,如果患者涂片阴性并接受了双侧LT,他们可能并不一定需要在移植前或移植后接受MAC治疗。
Clinical outcomes of lung transplant recipients with pre-transplant Mycobacterium avium complex infection.
Background: Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are at risk for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections, in part due to the presence of structural lung disease pre-transplant and relatively higher levels of immunosuppression post-transplant. There is a lack of data regarding outcomes of LTR with MAC infections pre-transplant.
Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who received lung transplants (LTs) from 2013 to 2020 with 1) evidence of MAC on culture or polymerase chain reaction before or at the time of transplant or 2) granulomas on explant pathology and positive acid-fast bacillus stains with no other mycobacteria identified. Patients were deemed to have MAC pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) if they met the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America criteria.
Results: Fourteen patients (14/882, 2%) met inclusion criteria. Seven patients (7/14, 50%) had pre-transplant MAC-PD, four of whom had cavitary disease. None of the 14 patients had smear-positive cultures at the time of transplant. Two patients in our cohort received treatment for MAC before transplant. Thirteen patients were bilateral LTR (13/14, 93%). One single LTR was the sole patient to receive MAC treatment post-transplant. No patients developed MAC-PD after transplant.
Conclusion: The bilateral LTR in our cohort did not develop MAC-PD despite not receiving MAC treatment post-transplant. It is possible source control was achieved with native lung explantation. Our observations suggest patients may not uniformly require pre- or post-transplant MAC treatment if they are smear-negative and undergo bilateral LT.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.