用于磁共振神经成像的自动周围神经分割。

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Experimental Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1186/s41747-024-00503-8
Nedim Christoph Beste, Johann Jende, Moritz Kronlage, Felix Kurz, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Hagen Meredig
{"title":"用于磁共振神经成像的自动周围神经分割。","authors":"Nedim Christoph Beste, Johann Jende, Moritz Kronlage, Felix Kurz, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Hagen Meredig","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00503-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool for peripheral neuropathies. Quantitative measures enhance MRN interpretation but require nerve segmentation which is time-consuming and error-prone and has not become clinical routine. In this study, we applied neural networks for the automated segmentation of peripheral nerves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A neural segmentation network was trained to segment the sciatic nerve and its proximal branches on the MRN scans of the right and left upper leg of 35 healthy individuals, resulting in 70 training examples, via 5-fold cross-validation (CV). The model performance was evaluated on an independent test set of one-sided MRN scans of 60 healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) in CV was 0.892 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.888-0.897) with a mean Jaccard index (JI) of 0.806 (95% CI: 0.799-0.814) and mean Hausdorff distance (HD) of 2.146 (95% CI: 2.184-2.208). For the independent test set, DSC and JI were lower while HD was higher, with a mean DSC of 0.789 (95% CI: 0.760-0.815), mean JI of 0.672 (95% CI: 0.642-0.699), and mean HD of 2.118 (95% CI: 2.047-2.190).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The deep learning-based segmentation model showed a good performance for the task of nerve segmentation. Future work will focus on extending training data and including individuals with peripheral neuropathies in training to enable advanced peripheral nerve disease characterization.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>The results will serve as a baseline to build upon while developing an automated quantitative MRN feature analysis framework for application in routine reading of MRN examinations.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Quantitative measures enhance MRN interpretation, requiring complex and challenging nerve segmentation. We present a deep learning-based segmentation model with good performance. Our results may serve as a baseline for clinical automated quantitative MRN segmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"8 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated peripheral nerve segmentation for MR-neurography.\",\"authors\":\"Nedim Christoph Beste, Johann Jende, Moritz Kronlage, Felix Kurz, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus, Hagen Meredig\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41747-024-00503-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool for peripheral neuropathies. Quantitative measures enhance MRN interpretation but require nerve segmentation which is time-consuming and error-prone and has not become clinical routine. In this study, we applied neural networks for the automated segmentation of peripheral nerves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A neural segmentation network was trained to segment the sciatic nerve and its proximal branches on the MRN scans of the right and left upper leg of 35 healthy individuals, resulting in 70 training examples, via 5-fold cross-validation (CV). The model performance was evaluated on an independent test set of one-sided MRN scans of 60 healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) in CV was 0.892 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.888-0.897) with a mean Jaccard index (JI) of 0.806 (95% CI: 0.799-0.814) and mean Hausdorff distance (HD) of 2.146 (95% CI: 2.184-2.208). For the independent test set, DSC and JI were lower while HD was higher, with a mean DSC of 0.789 (95% CI: 0.760-0.815), mean JI of 0.672 (95% CI: 0.642-0.699), and mean HD of 2.118 (95% CI: 2.047-2.190).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The deep learning-based segmentation model showed a good performance for the task of nerve segmentation. Future work will focus on extending training data and including individuals with peripheral neuropathies in training to enable advanced peripheral nerve disease characterization.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>The results will serve as a baseline to build upon while developing an automated quantitative MRN feature analysis framework for application in routine reading of MRN examinations.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Quantitative measures enhance MRN interpretation, requiring complex and challenging nerve segmentation. We present a deep learning-based segmentation model with good performance. Our results may serve as a baseline for clinical automated quantitative MRN segmentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology Experimental\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347527/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00503-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00503-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:磁共振神经成像(MRN)越来越多地被用作周围神经病的诊断工具。定量测量可提高 MRN 的解释能力,但需要进行神经分割,这既费时又容易出错,而且尚未成为临床常规。在这项研究中,我们应用神经网络自动分割周围神经:方法:通过 5 倍交叉验证(CV),对神经分割网络进行训练,以分割 35 名健康人左右上肢 MRN 扫描的坐骨神经及其近端分支,共获得 70 个训练实例。在 60 名健康人的单侧 MRN 扫描的独立测试集上对模型性能进行了评估:CV中的平均狄斯相似系数(DSC)为0.892(95%置信区间[CI]:0.888-0.897),平均雅卡德指数(JI)为0.806(95% CI:0.799-0.814),平均豪斯多夫距离(HD)为2.146(95% CI:2.184-2.208)。对于独立测试集,DSC 和 JI 较低,而 HD 较高,平均 DSC 为 0.789(95% CI:0.760-0.815),平均 JI 为 0.672(95% CI:0.642-0.699),平均 HD 为 2.118(95% CI:2.047-2.190):基于深度学习的分割模型在神经分割任务中表现良好。未来的工作将侧重于扩展训练数据,并将患有周围神经病的个体纳入训练,以实现高级周围神经疾病特征描述:这些结果将作为一个基线,在此基础上开发一个自动定量 MRN 特征分析框架,应用于 MRN 检查的常规读取:定量测量可增强 MRN 解释,但需要复杂且具有挑战性的神经分割。我们提出的基于深度学习的分割模型性能良好。我们的结果可作为临床自动定量 MRN 分段的基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Automated peripheral nerve segmentation for MR-neurography.

Background: Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool for peripheral neuropathies. Quantitative measures enhance MRN interpretation but require nerve segmentation which is time-consuming and error-prone and has not become clinical routine. In this study, we applied neural networks for the automated segmentation of peripheral nerves.

Methods: A neural segmentation network was trained to segment the sciatic nerve and its proximal branches on the MRN scans of the right and left upper leg of 35 healthy individuals, resulting in 70 training examples, via 5-fold cross-validation (CV). The model performance was evaluated on an independent test set of one-sided MRN scans of 60 healthy individuals.

Results: Mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) in CV was 0.892 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.888-0.897) with a mean Jaccard index (JI) of 0.806 (95% CI: 0.799-0.814) and mean Hausdorff distance (HD) of 2.146 (95% CI: 2.184-2.208). For the independent test set, DSC and JI were lower while HD was higher, with a mean DSC of 0.789 (95% CI: 0.760-0.815), mean JI of 0.672 (95% CI: 0.642-0.699), and mean HD of 2.118 (95% CI: 2.047-2.190).

Conclusion: The deep learning-based segmentation model showed a good performance for the task of nerve segmentation. Future work will focus on extending training data and including individuals with peripheral neuropathies in training to enable advanced peripheral nerve disease characterization.

Relevance statement: The results will serve as a baseline to build upon while developing an automated quantitative MRN feature analysis framework for application in routine reading of MRN examinations.

Key points: Quantitative measures enhance MRN interpretation, requiring complex and challenging nerve segmentation. We present a deep learning-based segmentation model with good performance. Our results may serve as a baseline for clinical automated quantitative MRN segmentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
An AI deep learning algorithm for detecting pulmonary nodules on ultra-low-dose CT in an emergency setting: a reader study. Evaluation of pulmonary artery pressure, blood indices, and myocardial microcirculation in rats returning from high altitude to moderate altitude. Image biomarkers and explainable AI: handcrafted features versus deep learned features. Technical feasibility of automated blur detection in digital mammography using convolutional neural network. Quantification of breast biopsy clip marker artifact on routine breast MRI sequences: a phantom study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1