格鲁吉亚和亚美尼亚支持社会执行无烟政策的相关因素。

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/191510
Cassidy R LoParco, Ana Dekanosidze, Arevik Torosyan, Lilit Grigoryan, Varduhi Hayrumyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Yuxian Cui, Darcey McCready, Regine Haardӧrfer, Nour Alayan, Michelle C Kegler, Alexander Bazarchyan, Lela Sturua, Marina Topuridze, Carla J Berg
{"title":"格鲁吉亚和亚美尼亚支持社会执行无烟政策的相关因素。","authors":"Cassidy R LoParco, Ana Dekanosidze, Arevik Torosyan, Lilit Grigoryan, Varduhi Hayrumyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Yuxian Cui, Darcey McCready, Regine Haardӧrfer, Nour Alayan, Michelle C Kegler, Alexander Bazarchyan, Lela Sturua, Marina Topuridze, Carla J Berg","doi":"10.18332/tpc/191510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Armenia's and Georgia's high rates of smoking and secondhand smoke and recent implementation of smoke-free laws provide a timely opportunity to examine factors that increase compliance, like social enforcement and support for governmental enforcement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2022 data from 1468 Armenian and Georgian adults (mean age=42.92 years, 48.6% male, 31.6% past-month smoking), multilevel linear regression examined tobacco-related media exposures, social exposures, and perceptions/attitudes in relation to: 1) likelihood of asking someone to extinguish cigarettes where a) prohibited and b) allowed; and 2) support of fines for smoke-free violations (1=not at all to 4=very).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was low average likelihood of asking someone to extinguish cigarettes where allowed (mean=1.01, SD=1.12) or prohibited (mean=1.57, SD=1.21) and 'little' agreement with fines for smoke-free violations (mean=2.13, SD=1.06). Having fewer friends who smoked, greater support for indoor smoke-free laws, and no past-month cigarette use were positively associated with all 3 outcomes. Greater exposure to media and community-based action supporting smoke-free policies, and witnessing more requests to stop smoking where prohibited, were associated with higher likelihood of asking someone to extinguish cigarettes where allowed or prohibited. Less exposure to news stories opposing smoke-free policies and cigarette ads and higher perceived harm of cigarettes were also related to higher likelihood of asking someone to stop smoking where prohibited. Higher perceived harm of cigarettes was also associated with greater agreement with fines for smoke-free violations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comprehensive strategies targeting social norms, media exposure, and risk perceptions are needed to effectively facilitate strategies to enhance smoke-free law enforcement.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with support for social enforcement of smoke-free policies in Georgia and Armenia.\",\"authors\":\"Cassidy R LoParco, Ana Dekanosidze, Arevik Torosyan, Lilit Grigoryan, Varduhi Hayrumyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Yuxian Cui, Darcey McCready, Regine Haardӧrfer, Nour Alayan, Michelle C Kegler, Alexander Bazarchyan, Lela Sturua, Marina Topuridze, Carla J Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/tpc/191510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Armenia's and Georgia's high rates of smoking and secondhand smoke and recent implementation of smoke-free laws provide a timely opportunity to examine factors that increase compliance, like social enforcement and support for governmental enforcement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2022 data from 1468 Armenian and Georgian adults (mean age=42.92 years, 48.6% male, 31.6% past-month smoking), multilevel linear regression examined tobacco-related media exposures, social exposures, and perceptions/attitudes in relation to: 1) likelihood of asking someone to extinguish cigarettes where a) prohibited and b) allowed; and 2) support of fines for smoke-free violations (1=not at all to 4=very).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was low average likelihood of asking someone to extinguish cigarettes where allowed (mean=1.01, SD=1.12) or prohibited (mean=1.57, SD=1.21) and 'little' agreement with fines for smoke-free violations (mean=2.13, SD=1.06). Having fewer friends who smoked, greater support for indoor smoke-free laws, and no past-month cigarette use were positively associated with all 3 outcomes. Greater exposure to media and community-based action supporting smoke-free policies, and witnessing more requests to stop smoking where prohibited, were associated with higher likelihood of asking someone to extinguish cigarettes where allowed or prohibited. Less exposure to news stories opposing smoke-free policies and cigarette ads and higher perceived harm of cigarettes were also related to higher likelihood of asking someone to stop smoking where prohibited. Higher perceived harm of cigarettes was also associated with greater agreement with fines for smoke-free violations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comprehensive strategies targeting social norms, media exposure, and risk perceptions are needed to effectively facilitate strategies to enhance smoke-free law enforcement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342805/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/191510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/191510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的吸烟率和二手烟率很高,最近又实施了无烟法律,这为研究社会执法和对政府执法的支持等提高守法率的因素提供了一个及时的机会:使用来自 1468 名亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚成年人(平均年龄 42.92 岁,48.6% 为男性,31.6% 在过去一个月吸烟)的 2022 个数据,多层次线性回归研究了与烟草相关的媒体接触、社会接触以及与以下方面相关的认知/态度:1)在 a) 禁止和 b) 允许的情况下要求他人熄灭香烟的可能性;以及 2)支持对违反无烟规定的行为处以罚款(1=完全不支持到 4=非常支持):在允许(平均值=1.01,标准差=1.12)或禁止(平均值=1.57,标准差=1.21)的情况下,要求他人熄灭香烟的平均可能性较低,对违反无烟规定的罚款 "几乎 "不同意(平均值=2.13,标准差=1.06)。吸烟的朋友越少、对室内无烟法律的支持程度越高、过去一个月不吸烟与上述三项结果均呈正相关。更多接触支持无烟政策的媒体和社区行动,以及目睹更多在禁止吸烟的地方停止吸烟的要求,与更有可能在允许或禁止吸烟的地方要求他人熄灭香烟有关。较少接触反对无烟政策的新闻报道和香烟广告,以及较高的香烟危害感知也与较高的要求他人在禁止吸烟的地方熄灭香烟的可能性有关。香烟危害感知越高,越同意对违反无烟政策的行为处以罚款:结论:需要针对社会规范、媒体曝光和风险认知的综合策略,以有效促进加强无烟执法的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors associated with support for social enforcement of smoke-free policies in Georgia and Armenia.

Introduction: Armenia's and Georgia's high rates of smoking and secondhand smoke and recent implementation of smoke-free laws provide a timely opportunity to examine factors that increase compliance, like social enforcement and support for governmental enforcement.

Methods: Using 2022 data from 1468 Armenian and Georgian adults (mean age=42.92 years, 48.6% male, 31.6% past-month smoking), multilevel linear regression examined tobacco-related media exposures, social exposures, and perceptions/attitudes in relation to: 1) likelihood of asking someone to extinguish cigarettes where a) prohibited and b) allowed; and 2) support of fines for smoke-free violations (1=not at all to 4=very).

Results: There was low average likelihood of asking someone to extinguish cigarettes where allowed (mean=1.01, SD=1.12) or prohibited (mean=1.57, SD=1.21) and 'little' agreement with fines for smoke-free violations (mean=2.13, SD=1.06). Having fewer friends who smoked, greater support for indoor smoke-free laws, and no past-month cigarette use were positively associated with all 3 outcomes. Greater exposure to media and community-based action supporting smoke-free policies, and witnessing more requests to stop smoking where prohibited, were associated with higher likelihood of asking someone to extinguish cigarettes where allowed or prohibited. Less exposure to news stories opposing smoke-free policies and cigarette ads and higher perceived harm of cigarettes were also related to higher likelihood of asking someone to stop smoking where prohibited. Higher perceived harm of cigarettes was also associated with greater agreement with fines for smoke-free violations.

Conclusions: Comprehensive strategies targeting social norms, media exposure, and risk perceptions are needed to effectively facilitate strategies to enhance smoke-free law enforcement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of e-cigarettes among young adults in Cape Town, South Africa: Insights from focus groups to inform regulations and prevention strategies. Factors associated with support for social enforcement of smoke-free policies in Georgia and Armenia. The history of smoking cessation support in Hungary: A narrative review The history of smoking cessation support in Hungary: A narrative review Marketing of nicotinamide as nicotine replacement in electronic cigarettes and smokeless tobacco.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1